Cargando…
An Evaluation of the Accuracy and Precision of Ceramic Orthodontic Bracket Slot Dimensions Utilizing Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT)
This study’s aim is to determine the accuracy and precision of the bracket slot height in MBT 0.022″ ceramic brackets. Five brackets from 11 different systems (n = 55) were scanned using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). The slot height was measured at the face (external) and base (internal) of...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366895/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37489477 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography9040109 |
_version_ | 1785077271857463296 |
---|---|
author | Garrett, Antonio Alghilan, Maryam A. Ash, Simon Awawdeh, Mohammed Singh, Parmjit |
author_facet | Garrett, Antonio Alghilan, Maryam A. Ash, Simon Awawdeh, Mohammed Singh, Parmjit |
author_sort | Garrett, Antonio |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study’s aim is to determine the accuracy and precision of the bracket slot height in MBT 0.022″ ceramic brackets. Five brackets from 11 different systems (n = 55) were scanned using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). The slot height was measured at the face (external) and base (internal) of the slot. Data were analyzed using a One-Sample t-Test, and a Paired t-Test. The lowest external height was seen in OrthoCare Purity(®) at 0.02264″ (2.9%), and the greatest in TOC Ghost Advanced(®) at 0.02736″ (24.4%). The lowest internal height was seen in Forestadent Glam(®) at 0.02020″ (−8.2%), and the greatest in TOC Ghost Advanced(®) at 0.2547″ (15.8%). OrthoCare Purity(®) measurements corresponded most closely with the expected measurements. TP InVu(®) was found to be the most precise bracket for external height (range = 0.00043″) and American Orthodontics 20/40(®) for internal height (range = 0.00028″). In assessing slot geometry, all brackets demonstrated a higher mean external slot height compared to the internal measurements at the base of the bracket. Orthodontic bracket slots are larger than expected and slot parallelism was not observed in any bracket brand tested. Similarly, slot dimensions are imprecise where two ‘identical’ brackets have different slot sizes. The clinician should, therefore, assume that play is most likely higher than expected. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10366895 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103668952023-07-26 An Evaluation of the Accuracy and Precision of Ceramic Orthodontic Bracket Slot Dimensions Utilizing Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT) Garrett, Antonio Alghilan, Maryam A. Ash, Simon Awawdeh, Mohammed Singh, Parmjit Tomography Article This study’s aim is to determine the accuracy and precision of the bracket slot height in MBT 0.022″ ceramic brackets. Five brackets from 11 different systems (n = 55) were scanned using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). The slot height was measured at the face (external) and base (internal) of the slot. Data were analyzed using a One-Sample t-Test, and a Paired t-Test. The lowest external height was seen in OrthoCare Purity(®) at 0.02264″ (2.9%), and the greatest in TOC Ghost Advanced(®) at 0.02736″ (24.4%). The lowest internal height was seen in Forestadent Glam(®) at 0.02020″ (−8.2%), and the greatest in TOC Ghost Advanced(®) at 0.2547″ (15.8%). OrthoCare Purity(®) measurements corresponded most closely with the expected measurements. TP InVu(®) was found to be the most precise bracket for external height (range = 0.00043″) and American Orthodontics 20/40(®) for internal height (range = 0.00028″). In assessing slot geometry, all brackets demonstrated a higher mean external slot height compared to the internal measurements at the base of the bracket. Orthodontic bracket slots are larger than expected and slot parallelism was not observed in any bracket brand tested. Similarly, slot dimensions are imprecise where two ‘identical’ brackets have different slot sizes. The clinician should, therefore, assume that play is most likely higher than expected. MDPI 2023-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10366895/ /pubmed/37489477 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography9040109 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Garrett, Antonio Alghilan, Maryam A. Ash, Simon Awawdeh, Mohammed Singh, Parmjit An Evaluation of the Accuracy and Precision of Ceramic Orthodontic Bracket Slot Dimensions Utilizing Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT) |
title | An Evaluation of the Accuracy and Precision of Ceramic Orthodontic Bracket Slot Dimensions Utilizing Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT) |
title_full | An Evaluation of the Accuracy and Precision of Ceramic Orthodontic Bracket Slot Dimensions Utilizing Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT) |
title_fullStr | An Evaluation of the Accuracy and Precision of Ceramic Orthodontic Bracket Slot Dimensions Utilizing Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT) |
title_full_unstemmed | An Evaluation of the Accuracy and Precision of Ceramic Orthodontic Bracket Slot Dimensions Utilizing Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT) |
title_short | An Evaluation of the Accuracy and Precision of Ceramic Orthodontic Bracket Slot Dimensions Utilizing Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT) |
title_sort | evaluation of the accuracy and precision of ceramic orthodontic bracket slot dimensions utilizing micro-computed tomography (micro-ct) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366895/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37489477 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography9040109 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garrettantonio anevaluationoftheaccuracyandprecisionofceramicorthodonticbracketslotdimensionsutilizingmicrocomputedtomographymicroct AT alghilanmaryama anevaluationoftheaccuracyandprecisionofceramicorthodonticbracketslotdimensionsutilizingmicrocomputedtomographymicroct AT ashsimon anevaluationoftheaccuracyandprecisionofceramicorthodonticbracketslotdimensionsutilizingmicrocomputedtomographymicroct AT awawdehmohammed anevaluationoftheaccuracyandprecisionofceramicorthodonticbracketslotdimensionsutilizingmicrocomputedtomographymicroct AT singhparmjit anevaluationoftheaccuracyandprecisionofceramicorthodonticbracketslotdimensionsutilizingmicrocomputedtomographymicroct AT garrettantonio evaluationoftheaccuracyandprecisionofceramicorthodonticbracketslotdimensionsutilizingmicrocomputedtomographymicroct AT alghilanmaryama evaluationoftheaccuracyandprecisionofceramicorthodonticbracketslotdimensionsutilizingmicrocomputedtomographymicroct AT ashsimon evaluationoftheaccuracyandprecisionofceramicorthodonticbracketslotdimensionsutilizingmicrocomputedtomographymicroct AT awawdehmohammed evaluationoftheaccuracyandprecisionofceramicorthodonticbracketslotdimensionsutilizingmicrocomputedtomographymicroct AT singhparmjit evaluationoftheaccuracyandprecisionofceramicorthodonticbracketslotdimensionsutilizingmicrocomputedtomographymicroct |