Cargando…

An Evaluation of the Accuracy and Precision of Ceramic Orthodontic Bracket Slot Dimensions Utilizing Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT)

This study’s aim is to determine the accuracy and precision of the bracket slot height in MBT 0.022″ ceramic brackets. Five brackets from 11 different systems (n = 55) were scanned using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). The slot height was measured at the face (external) and base (internal) of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garrett, Antonio, Alghilan, Maryam A., Ash, Simon, Awawdeh, Mohammed, Singh, Parmjit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37489477
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography9040109
_version_ 1785077271857463296
author Garrett, Antonio
Alghilan, Maryam A.
Ash, Simon
Awawdeh, Mohammed
Singh, Parmjit
author_facet Garrett, Antonio
Alghilan, Maryam A.
Ash, Simon
Awawdeh, Mohammed
Singh, Parmjit
author_sort Garrett, Antonio
collection PubMed
description This study’s aim is to determine the accuracy and precision of the bracket slot height in MBT 0.022″ ceramic brackets. Five brackets from 11 different systems (n = 55) were scanned using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). The slot height was measured at the face (external) and base (internal) of the slot. Data were analyzed using a One-Sample t-Test, and a Paired t-Test. The lowest external height was seen in OrthoCare Purity(®) at 0.02264″ (2.9%), and the greatest in TOC Ghost Advanced(®) at 0.02736″ (24.4%). The lowest internal height was seen in Forestadent Glam(®) at 0.02020″ (−8.2%), and the greatest in TOC Ghost Advanced(®) at 0.2547″ (15.8%). OrthoCare Purity(®) measurements corresponded most closely with the expected measurements. TP InVu(®) was found to be the most precise bracket for external height (range = 0.00043″) and American Orthodontics 20/40(®) for internal height (range = 0.00028″). In assessing slot geometry, all brackets demonstrated a higher mean external slot height compared to the internal measurements at the base of the bracket. Orthodontic bracket slots are larger than expected and slot parallelism was not observed in any bracket brand tested. Similarly, slot dimensions are imprecise where two ‘identical’ brackets have different slot sizes. The clinician should, therefore, assume that play is most likely higher than expected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10366895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103668952023-07-26 An Evaluation of the Accuracy and Precision of Ceramic Orthodontic Bracket Slot Dimensions Utilizing Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT) Garrett, Antonio Alghilan, Maryam A. Ash, Simon Awawdeh, Mohammed Singh, Parmjit Tomography Article This study’s aim is to determine the accuracy and precision of the bracket slot height in MBT 0.022″ ceramic brackets. Five brackets from 11 different systems (n = 55) were scanned using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). The slot height was measured at the face (external) and base (internal) of the slot. Data were analyzed using a One-Sample t-Test, and a Paired t-Test. The lowest external height was seen in OrthoCare Purity(®) at 0.02264″ (2.9%), and the greatest in TOC Ghost Advanced(®) at 0.02736″ (24.4%). The lowest internal height was seen in Forestadent Glam(®) at 0.02020″ (−8.2%), and the greatest in TOC Ghost Advanced(®) at 0.2547″ (15.8%). OrthoCare Purity(®) measurements corresponded most closely with the expected measurements. TP InVu(®) was found to be the most precise bracket for external height (range = 0.00043″) and American Orthodontics 20/40(®) for internal height (range = 0.00028″). In assessing slot geometry, all brackets demonstrated a higher mean external slot height compared to the internal measurements at the base of the bracket. Orthodontic bracket slots are larger than expected and slot parallelism was not observed in any bracket brand tested. Similarly, slot dimensions are imprecise where two ‘identical’ brackets have different slot sizes. The clinician should, therefore, assume that play is most likely higher than expected. MDPI 2023-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10366895/ /pubmed/37489477 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography9040109 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Garrett, Antonio
Alghilan, Maryam A.
Ash, Simon
Awawdeh, Mohammed
Singh, Parmjit
An Evaluation of the Accuracy and Precision of Ceramic Orthodontic Bracket Slot Dimensions Utilizing Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT)
title An Evaluation of the Accuracy and Precision of Ceramic Orthodontic Bracket Slot Dimensions Utilizing Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT)
title_full An Evaluation of the Accuracy and Precision of Ceramic Orthodontic Bracket Slot Dimensions Utilizing Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT)
title_fullStr An Evaluation of the Accuracy and Precision of Ceramic Orthodontic Bracket Slot Dimensions Utilizing Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT)
title_full_unstemmed An Evaluation of the Accuracy and Precision of Ceramic Orthodontic Bracket Slot Dimensions Utilizing Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT)
title_short An Evaluation of the Accuracy and Precision of Ceramic Orthodontic Bracket Slot Dimensions Utilizing Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT)
title_sort evaluation of the accuracy and precision of ceramic orthodontic bracket slot dimensions utilizing micro-computed tomography (micro-ct)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37489477
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography9040109
work_keys_str_mv AT garrettantonio anevaluationoftheaccuracyandprecisionofceramicorthodonticbracketslotdimensionsutilizingmicrocomputedtomographymicroct
AT alghilanmaryama anevaluationoftheaccuracyandprecisionofceramicorthodonticbracketslotdimensionsutilizingmicrocomputedtomographymicroct
AT ashsimon anevaluationoftheaccuracyandprecisionofceramicorthodonticbracketslotdimensionsutilizingmicrocomputedtomographymicroct
AT awawdehmohammed anevaluationoftheaccuracyandprecisionofceramicorthodonticbracketslotdimensionsutilizingmicrocomputedtomographymicroct
AT singhparmjit anevaluationoftheaccuracyandprecisionofceramicorthodonticbracketslotdimensionsutilizingmicrocomputedtomographymicroct
AT garrettantonio evaluationoftheaccuracyandprecisionofceramicorthodonticbracketslotdimensionsutilizingmicrocomputedtomographymicroct
AT alghilanmaryama evaluationoftheaccuracyandprecisionofceramicorthodonticbracketslotdimensionsutilizingmicrocomputedtomographymicroct
AT ashsimon evaluationoftheaccuracyandprecisionofceramicorthodonticbracketslotdimensionsutilizingmicrocomputedtomographymicroct
AT awawdehmohammed evaluationoftheaccuracyandprecisionofceramicorthodonticbracketslotdimensionsutilizingmicrocomputedtomographymicroct
AT singhparmjit evaluationoftheaccuracyandprecisionofceramicorthodonticbracketslotdimensionsutilizingmicrocomputedtomographymicroct