Cargando…

Retrospective evaluation of the effects of traditional interscalene block alone versus combined with superior truncus block-associated diaphragm paralysis during arthroscopic shoulder surgery

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of traditional interscalene block (ISB) alone and ISB combined with superior truncus block (STB)-associated diaphragm paralysis evaluated by ultrasound, duration of analgesia, and rate of complication in patients undergoing arthroscopi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gungor, Irfan, Emmez, Gokcen, Kaptan, A. Bengu, Gunaydin, Berrin, Kanatli, Ulunay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10367143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37462635
http://dx.doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2023.977
_version_ 1785077323587911680
author Gungor, Irfan
Emmez, Gokcen
Kaptan, A. Bengu
Gunaydin, Berrin
Kanatli, Ulunay
author_facet Gungor, Irfan
Emmez, Gokcen
Kaptan, A. Bengu
Gunaydin, Berrin
Kanatli, Ulunay
author_sort Gungor, Irfan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of traditional interscalene block (ISB) alone and ISB combined with superior truncus block (STB)-associated diaphragm paralysis evaluated by ultrasound, duration of analgesia, and rate of complication in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2020 and December 2022, a total of 285 patients (158 males, 127 females; mean age: 48.0±15.1 years; range, 18 to 80 years) who underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery under ISB, either alone or combined with STB, were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were operated under ISB alone using 30 mL 0.5% bupivacaine (n=140) or ISB using 10 mL (n=67) or 5 mL 0.5% bupivacaine (n=78) combined with STB using 20 mL 0.5% bupivacaine. Ultrasound reports of all patients’ diaphragm function were also retrieved. Duration of analgesia, need for additional analgesics, and the type of analgesic drugs, and evaluations of patient and surgeon satisfactions were evaluated. Degree of diaphragm paralysis considered as complete (≥75%), partial (25.1 to 74.9%) and no paralysis (≤25%) were evaluated for comparison between the block types. RESULTS: The patients underwent operation due to rotator cuff rupture (n=218) or Bankart (n=67). Duration of analgesia, need for additional analgesia, and the type of analgesic drugs used were comparable between the block types. The most common complication was Horner syndrome (n=96, 33.68%) which was significantly lower in ISB (5 mL) +STB (20 mL) than the others (17.9% vs. 41.4% and 37.3%, p=0.002). The ISB (5 mL bupivacaine 0.5%) + STB (20 mL bupivacaine 0.5%) resulted in less complete diaphragm paralysis with adequate surgical anesthesia not requiring general anesthesia. CONCLUSION: The ISB using 5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine + STB instead of traditional ISB alone can be preferred due to the low rate of complete hemi-diaphragm paralysis with adequate surgical anesthesia/analgesia and high patient and surgeon satisfaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10367143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Bayçınar Medical Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103671432023-07-26 Retrospective evaluation of the effects of traditional interscalene block alone versus combined with superior truncus block-associated diaphragm paralysis during arthroscopic shoulder surgery Gungor, Irfan Emmez, Gokcen Kaptan, A. Bengu Gunaydin, Berrin Kanatli, Ulunay Jt Dis Relat Surg Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of traditional interscalene block (ISB) alone and ISB combined with superior truncus block (STB)-associated diaphragm paralysis evaluated by ultrasound, duration of analgesia, and rate of complication in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2020 and December 2022, a total of 285 patients (158 males, 127 females; mean age: 48.0±15.1 years; range, 18 to 80 years) who underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery under ISB, either alone or combined with STB, were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were operated under ISB alone using 30 mL 0.5% bupivacaine (n=140) or ISB using 10 mL (n=67) or 5 mL 0.5% bupivacaine (n=78) combined with STB using 20 mL 0.5% bupivacaine. Ultrasound reports of all patients’ diaphragm function were also retrieved. Duration of analgesia, need for additional analgesics, and the type of analgesic drugs, and evaluations of patient and surgeon satisfactions were evaluated. Degree of diaphragm paralysis considered as complete (≥75%), partial (25.1 to 74.9%) and no paralysis (≤25%) were evaluated for comparison between the block types. RESULTS: The patients underwent operation due to rotator cuff rupture (n=218) or Bankart (n=67). Duration of analgesia, need for additional analgesia, and the type of analgesic drugs used were comparable between the block types. The most common complication was Horner syndrome (n=96, 33.68%) which was significantly lower in ISB (5 mL) +STB (20 mL) than the others (17.9% vs. 41.4% and 37.3%, p=0.002). The ISB (5 mL bupivacaine 0.5%) + STB (20 mL bupivacaine 0.5%) resulted in less complete diaphragm paralysis with adequate surgical anesthesia not requiring general anesthesia. CONCLUSION: The ISB using 5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine + STB instead of traditional ISB alone can be preferred due to the low rate of complete hemi-diaphragm paralysis with adequate surgical anesthesia/analgesia and high patient and surgeon satisfaction. Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2023-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10367143/ /pubmed/37462635 http://dx.doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2023.977 Text en Copyright © 2023, Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gungor, Irfan
Emmez, Gokcen
Kaptan, A. Bengu
Gunaydin, Berrin
Kanatli, Ulunay
Retrospective evaluation of the effects of traditional interscalene block alone versus combined with superior truncus block-associated diaphragm paralysis during arthroscopic shoulder surgery
title Retrospective evaluation of the effects of traditional interscalene block alone versus combined with superior truncus block-associated diaphragm paralysis during arthroscopic shoulder surgery
title_full Retrospective evaluation of the effects of traditional interscalene block alone versus combined with superior truncus block-associated diaphragm paralysis during arthroscopic shoulder surgery
title_fullStr Retrospective evaluation of the effects of traditional interscalene block alone versus combined with superior truncus block-associated diaphragm paralysis during arthroscopic shoulder surgery
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective evaluation of the effects of traditional interscalene block alone versus combined with superior truncus block-associated diaphragm paralysis during arthroscopic shoulder surgery
title_short Retrospective evaluation of the effects of traditional interscalene block alone versus combined with superior truncus block-associated diaphragm paralysis during arthroscopic shoulder surgery
title_sort retrospective evaluation of the effects of traditional interscalene block alone versus combined with superior truncus block-associated diaphragm paralysis during arthroscopic shoulder surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10367143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37462635
http://dx.doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2023.977
work_keys_str_mv AT gungorirfan retrospectiveevaluationoftheeffectsoftraditionalinterscaleneblockaloneversuscombinedwithsuperiortruncusblockassociateddiaphragmparalysisduringarthroscopicshouldersurgery
AT emmezgokcen retrospectiveevaluationoftheeffectsoftraditionalinterscaleneblockaloneversuscombinedwithsuperiortruncusblockassociateddiaphragmparalysisduringarthroscopicshouldersurgery
AT kaptanabengu retrospectiveevaluationoftheeffectsoftraditionalinterscaleneblockaloneversuscombinedwithsuperiortruncusblockassociateddiaphragmparalysisduringarthroscopicshouldersurgery
AT gunaydinberrin retrospectiveevaluationoftheeffectsoftraditionalinterscaleneblockaloneversuscombinedwithsuperiortruncusblockassociateddiaphragmparalysisduringarthroscopicshouldersurgery
AT kanatliulunay retrospectiveevaluationoftheeffectsoftraditionalinterscaleneblockaloneversuscombinedwithsuperiortruncusblockassociateddiaphragmparalysisduringarthroscopicshouldersurgery