Cargando…

A network medicine approach to study comorbidities in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

BACKGROUND: Comorbidities are expected to impact the pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, comorbidity profiles are usually reduced to a few comorbid disorders. Systems medicine approaches can model phenome-wide comorbidity profiles to improve our u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lanzer, Jan D., Valdeolivas, Alberto, Pepin, Mark, Hund, Hauke, Backs, Johannes, Frey, Norbert, Friederich, Hans-Christoph, Schultz, Jobst-Hendrik, Saez-Rodriguez, Julio, Levinson, Rebecca T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10367269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37488529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-02922-7
_version_ 1785077351961329664
author Lanzer, Jan D.
Valdeolivas, Alberto
Pepin, Mark
Hund, Hauke
Backs, Johannes
Frey, Norbert
Friederich, Hans-Christoph
Schultz, Jobst-Hendrik
Saez-Rodriguez, Julio
Levinson, Rebecca T.
author_facet Lanzer, Jan D.
Valdeolivas, Alberto
Pepin, Mark
Hund, Hauke
Backs, Johannes
Frey, Norbert
Friederich, Hans-Christoph
Schultz, Jobst-Hendrik
Saez-Rodriguez, Julio
Levinson, Rebecca T.
author_sort Lanzer, Jan D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Comorbidities are expected to impact the pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, comorbidity profiles are usually reduced to a few comorbid disorders. Systems medicine approaches can model phenome-wide comorbidity profiles to improve our understanding of HFpEF and infer associated genetic profiles. METHODS: We retrospectively explored 569 comorbidities in 29,047 HF patients, including 8062 HFpEF and 6585 HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients from a German university hospital. We assessed differences in comorbidity profiles between HF subtypes via multiple correspondence analysis. Then, we used machine learning classifiers to identify distinctive comorbidity profiles of HFpEF and HFrEF patients. Moreover, we built a comorbidity network (HFnet) to identify the main disease clusters that summarized the phenome-wide comorbidity. Lastly, we predicted novel gene candidates for HFpEF by linking the HFnet to a multilayer gene network, integrating multiple databases. To corroborate HFpEF candidate genes, we collected transcriptomic data in a murine HFpEF model. We compared predicted genes with the murine disease signature as well as with the literature. RESULTS: We found a high degree of variance between the comorbidity profiles of HFpEF and HFrEF, while each was more similar to HFmrEF. The comorbidities present in HFpEF patients were more diverse than those in HFrEF and included neoplastic, osteologic and rheumatoid disorders. Disease communities in the HFnet captured important comorbidity concepts of HF patients which could be assigned to HF subtypes, age groups, and sex. Based on the HFpEF comorbidity profile, we predicted and recovered gene candidates, including genes involved in fibrosis (COL3A1, LOX, SMAD9, PTHL), hypertrophy (GATA5, MYH7), oxidative stress (NOS1, GSST1, XDH), and endoplasmic reticulum stress (ATF6). Finally, predicted genes were significantly overrepresented in the murine transcriptomic disease signature providing additional plausibility for their relevance. CONCLUSIONS: We applied systems medicine concepts to analyze comorbidity profiles in a HF patient cohort. We were able to identify disease clusters that helped to characterize HF patients. We derived a distinct comorbidity profile for HFpEF, which was leveraged to suggest novel candidate genes via network propagation. The identification of distinctive comorbidity profiles and candidate genes from routine clinical data provides insights that may be leveraged to improve diagnosis and identify treatment targets for HFpEF patients. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-023-02922-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10367269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103672692023-07-26 A network medicine approach to study comorbidities in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction Lanzer, Jan D. Valdeolivas, Alberto Pepin, Mark Hund, Hauke Backs, Johannes Frey, Norbert Friederich, Hans-Christoph Schultz, Jobst-Hendrik Saez-Rodriguez, Julio Levinson, Rebecca T. BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Comorbidities are expected to impact the pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, comorbidity profiles are usually reduced to a few comorbid disorders. Systems medicine approaches can model phenome-wide comorbidity profiles to improve our understanding of HFpEF and infer associated genetic profiles. METHODS: We retrospectively explored 569 comorbidities in 29,047 HF patients, including 8062 HFpEF and 6585 HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients from a German university hospital. We assessed differences in comorbidity profiles between HF subtypes via multiple correspondence analysis. Then, we used machine learning classifiers to identify distinctive comorbidity profiles of HFpEF and HFrEF patients. Moreover, we built a comorbidity network (HFnet) to identify the main disease clusters that summarized the phenome-wide comorbidity. Lastly, we predicted novel gene candidates for HFpEF by linking the HFnet to a multilayer gene network, integrating multiple databases. To corroborate HFpEF candidate genes, we collected transcriptomic data in a murine HFpEF model. We compared predicted genes with the murine disease signature as well as with the literature. RESULTS: We found a high degree of variance between the comorbidity profiles of HFpEF and HFrEF, while each was more similar to HFmrEF. The comorbidities present in HFpEF patients were more diverse than those in HFrEF and included neoplastic, osteologic and rheumatoid disorders. Disease communities in the HFnet captured important comorbidity concepts of HF patients which could be assigned to HF subtypes, age groups, and sex. Based on the HFpEF comorbidity profile, we predicted and recovered gene candidates, including genes involved in fibrosis (COL3A1, LOX, SMAD9, PTHL), hypertrophy (GATA5, MYH7), oxidative stress (NOS1, GSST1, XDH), and endoplasmic reticulum stress (ATF6). Finally, predicted genes were significantly overrepresented in the murine transcriptomic disease signature providing additional plausibility for their relevance. CONCLUSIONS: We applied systems medicine concepts to analyze comorbidity profiles in a HF patient cohort. We were able to identify disease clusters that helped to characterize HF patients. We derived a distinct comorbidity profile for HFpEF, which was leveraged to suggest novel candidate genes via network propagation. The identification of distinctive comorbidity profiles and candidate genes from routine clinical data provides insights that may be leveraged to improve diagnosis and identify treatment targets for HFpEF patients. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-023-02922-7. BioMed Central 2023-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10367269/ /pubmed/37488529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-02922-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lanzer, Jan D.
Valdeolivas, Alberto
Pepin, Mark
Hund, Hauke
Backs, Johannes
Frey, Norbert
Friederich, Hans-Christoph
Schultz, Jobst-Hendrik
Saez-Rodriguez, Julio
Levinson, Rebecca T.
A network medicine approach to study comorbidities in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
title A network medicine approach to study comorbidities in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
title_full A network medicine approach to study comorbidities in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
title_fullStr A network medicine approach to study comorbidities in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
title_full_unstemmed A network medicine approach to study comorbidities in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
title_short A network medicine approach to study comorbidities in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
title_sort network medicine approach to study comorbidities in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10367269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37488529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-02922-7
work_keys_str_mv AT lanzerjand anetworkmedicineapproachtostudycomorbiditiesinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction
AT valdeolivasalberto anetworkmedicineapproachtostudycomorbiditiesinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction
AT pepinmark anetworkmedicineapproachtostudycomorbiditiesinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction
AT hundhauke anetworkmedicineapproachtostudycomorbiditiesinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction
AT backsjohannes anetworkmedicineapproachtostudycomorbiditiesinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction
AT freynorbert anetworkmedicineapproachtostudycomorbiditiesinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction
AT friederichhanschristoph anetworkmedicineapproachtostudycomorbiditiesinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction
AT schultzjobsthendrik anetworkmedicineapproachtostudycomorbiditiesinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction
AT saezrodriguezjulio anetworkmedicineapproachtostudycomorbiditiesinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction
AT levinsonrebeccat anetworkmedicineapproachtostudycomorbiditiesinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction
AT lanzerjand networkmedicineapproachtostudycomorbiditiesinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction
AT valdeolivasalberto networkmedicineapproachtostudycomorbiditiesinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction
AT pepinmark networkmedicineapproachtostudycomorbiditiesinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction
AT hundhauke networkmedicineapproachtostudycomorbiditiesinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction
AT backsjohannes networkmedicineapproachtostudycomorbiditiesinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction
AT freynorbert networkmedicineapproachtostudycomorbiditiesinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction
AT friederichhanschristoph networkmedicineapproachtostudycomorbiditiesinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction
AT schultzjobsthendrik networkmedicineapproachtostudycomorbiditiesinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction
AT saezrodriguezjulio networkmedicineapproachtostudycomorbiditiesinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction
AT levinsonrebeccat networkmedicineapproachtostudycomorbiditiesinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction