Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Chlorhexidine, Diode Laser, and Saline in Reducing the Microbial Count in Primary Teeth Root Canals: An In Vivo Study

CONTEXT: Different irrigation materials in pediatric endodontics. AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of chlorhexidine (CHX), diode laser, and saline in primary teeth root canals. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This manuscript is designed to know the effectiveness of the different root canal irrigants and laser ir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Botu, Raj K, Rachuri, Punithavathy, Martha, Satyam, Raparla, Mythraiye, Matilda, Swathi, Yemparla, Seshaiah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10367290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37496951
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2596
_version_ 1785077357066846208
author Botu, Raj K
Rachuri, Punithavathy
Martha, Satyam
Raparla, Mythraiye
Matilda, Swathi
Yemparla, Seshaiah
author_facet Botu, Raj K
Rachuri, Punithavathy
Martha, Satyam
Raparla, Mythraiye
Matilda, Swathi
Yemparla, Seshaiah
author_sort Botu, Raj K
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Different irrigation materials in pediatric endodontics. AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of chlorhexidine (CHX), diode laser, and saline in primary teeth root canals. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This manuscript is designed to know the effectiveness of the different root canal irrigants and laser irradiation technology in primary teeth root canals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 primary teeth from 60 children were selected and divided into three groups of 20 each. Group I (CHX), group II (diode laser), and group III (saline). Pulp tissue was extirpated from the root canals of primary teeth, and samples were collected using sterile paper points. After cleaning and shaping, the root canals of the teeth in each group were disinfected using CHX and saline or irradiated with a diode laser. The samples were collected again and sent for microbiological examination. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Statistical analyzes were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Mann–Whitney U test, and Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance. All analyzes were conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 23.0. RESULTS: The colony-forming unit (CFU) of the predisinfection sample served as a baseline for comparisons throughout the study. The mean microbial counts of all the postdisinfected samples were reduced after disinfection. Intergroup comparisons showed significant results between groups I and III (CHX and saline) and groups II and III (diode laser and saline) (p < 0.01), whereas groups I and II (CHX and diode laser) showed nonsignificant results (p < 0.092). CONCLUSION: Diode laser irradiation succeeded in reducing root canal infection when compared with 2% CHX. Diode laser irradiation can also be used for disinfecting the root canal in primary teeth. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Botu RK, Rachuri P, Martha S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Chlorhexidine, Diode Laser, and Saline in Reducing the Microbial Count in Primary Teeth Root Canals: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(3):459-463.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10367290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103672902023-07-26 Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Chlorhexidine, Diode Laser, and Saline in Reducing the Microbial Count in Primary Teeth Root Canals: An In Vivo Study Botu, Raj K Rachuri, Punithavathy Martha, Satyam Raparla, Mythraiye Matilda, Swathi Yemparla, Seshaiah Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Research CONTEXT: Different irrigation materials in pediatric endodontics. AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of chlorhexidine (CHX), diode laser, and saline in primary teeth root canals. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This manuscript is designed to know the effectiveness of the different root canal irrigants and laser irradiation technology in primary teeth root canals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 primary teeth from 60 children were selected and divided into three groups of 20 each. Group I (CHX), group II (diode laser), and group III (saline). Pulp tissue was extirpated from the root canals of primary teeth, and samples were collected using sterile paper points. After cleaning and shaping, the root canals of the teeth in each group were disinfected using CHX and saline or irradiated with a diode laser. The samples were collected again and sent for microbiological examination. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Statistical analyzes were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Mann–Whitney U test, and Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance. All analyzes were conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 23.0. RESULTS: The colony-forming unit (CFU) of the predisinfection sample served as a baseline for comparisons throughout the study. The mean microbial counts of all the postdisinfected samples were reduced after disinfection. Intergroup comparisons showed significant results between groups I and III (CHX and saline) and groups II and III (diode laser and saline) (p < 0.01), whereas groups I and II (CHX and diode laser) showed nonsignificant results (p < 0.092). CONCLUSION: Diode laser irradiation succeeded in reducing root canal infection when compared with 2% CHX. Diode laser irradiation can also be used for disinfecting the root canal in primary teeth. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Botu RK, Rachuri P, Martha S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Chlorhexidine, Diode Laser, and Saline in Reducing the Microbial Count in Primary Teeth Root Canals: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(3):459-463. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10367290/ /pubmed/37496951 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2596 Text en Copyright © 2023; The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© The Author(s). 2023 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Botu, Raj K
Rachuri, Punithavathy
Martha, Satyam
Raparla, Mythraiye
Matilda, Swathi
Yemparla, Seshaiah
Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Chlorhexidine, Diode Laser, and Saline in Reducing the Microbial Count in Primary Teeth Root Canals: An In Vivo Study
title Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Chlorhexidine, Diode Laser, and Saline in Reducing the Microbial Count in Primary Teeth Root Canals: An In Vivo Study
title_full Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Chlorhexidine, Diode Laser, and Saline in Reducing the Microbial Count in Primary Teeth Root Canals: An In Vivo Study
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Chlorhexidine, Diode Laser, and Saline in Reducing the Microbial Count in Primary Teeth Root Canals: An In Vivo Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Chlorhexidine, Diode Laser, and Saline in Reducing the Microbial Count in Primary Teeth Root Canals: An In Vivo Study
title_short Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Chlorhexidine, Diode Laser, and Saline in Reducing the Microbial Count in Primary Teeth Root Canals: An In Vivo Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of the efficacy of chlorhexidine, diode laser, and saline in reducing the microbial count in primary teeth root canals: an in vivo study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10367290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37496951
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2596
work_keys_str_mv AT boturajk comparativeevaluationoftheefficacyofchlorhexidinediodelaserandsalineinreducingthemicrobialcountinprimaryteethrootcanalsaninvivostudy
AT rachuripunithavathy comparativeevaluationoftheefficacyofchlorhexidinediodelaserandsalineinreducingthemicrobialcountinprimaryteethrootcanalsaninvivostudy
AT marthasatyam comparativeevaluationoftheefficacyofchlorhexidinediodelaserandsalineinreducingthemicrobialcountinprimaryteethrootcanalsaninvivostudy
AT raparlamythraiye comparativeevaluationoftheefficacyofchlorhexidinediodelaserandsalineinreducingthemicrobialcountinprimaryteethrootcanalsaninvivostudy
AT matildaswathi comparativeevaluationoftheefficacyofchlorhexidinediodelaserandsalineinreducingthemicrobialcountinprimaryteethrootcanalsaninvivostudy
AT yemparlaseshaiah comparativeevaluationoftheefficacyofchlorhexidinediodelaserandsalineinreducingthemicrobialcountinprimaryteethrootcanalsaninvivostudy