New approaches to explanting high-viscosity silicone oil in retinal surgery—polyimide cannulas vs extraction sleeves vs a luer-trocar

BACKGROUND: The removal of high-viscosity silicone oil in retinal surgery is time-intensive. In this laboratory and porcine eye study, we evaluated the efficiency of novel extraction techniques, namely shortened polyimide-cannulas, an extraction sleeve and an experimental luer-trocar system, for commercially available silicone oils. METHODS: The volume of silicone oil after a 5-min removal time was quantified. The feasibility of all studied techniques was additionally tested in vitrectomized porcine eyes. Siluron 1000, 2000, 5000 and Xtra, as well as Densiron 68 and Densiron Xtra were examined. RESULTS: Shortening the 23G-polyimide-cannula from 6 mm up to 1.5 mm led to a significantly higher mean aspirated volume (e.g., 1 ml/min to 1.7 ml/min for Siluron Xtra). The extraction sleeve and luer-trocar increased the flow threefold compared to the shortest polyimide cannulas at 23G (5.2 ml/min and 5.2 ml/min vs 1.7 ml/min for Siluron Xtra, respectively). The extraction sleeve and luer-trocar system reached a similar flow at 27G as the best performing 23G-cannula. Angulation and movement of the eye was possible with the 2 mm-cannula, no angulation was possible when using the extraction sleeve. Stability and control were not impaired with the experimental luer-trocar setup. CONCLUSION: Shorter polyimide-cannulas and extraction sleeves increase the extraction flow but may decrease stability during surgery. The luer-trocar system facilitates rapid removal while offering great stability and control. Small 27G silicone oil removal is possible and time efficient.