Cargando…

Scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner according to different inlay preparation designs

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of intraoral scanning plays a crucial role in the workflow of computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing. However, data regarding scanning accuracy for inlay preparation designs are lacking. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Yeri, Kim, Jae-Hoon, Park, Jeong-Kil, Son, Sung-Ae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10367335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37488581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03233-2
_version_ 1785077368139808768
author Park, Yeri
Kim, Jae-Hoon
Park, Jeong-Kil
Son, Sung-Ae
author_facet Park, Yeri
Kim, Jae-Hoon
Park, Jeong-Kil
Son, Sung-Ae
author_sort Park, Yeri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The accuracy of intraoral scanning plays a crucial role in the workflow of computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing. However, data regarding scanning accuracy for inlay preparation designs are lacking. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of the depth of the occlusal cavity and width of the gingival floor of the proximal box on the trueness and precision of intraoral scans for inlay restoration. METHODS: Artificial teeth were used in this study. Four types of preparations for mesio-occlusal inlay were performed on each #36 artificial tooth depending on two different depths of the occlusal cavity (1 mm and 2 mm) and widths of the gingival floor of the proximal box (1.5 mm and 2.5 mm). Artificial teeth were scanned 10 times each with Cerec Primescan AC, and another scan was performed subsequently with a laboratory scanner as a reference (n = 10). Standard tessellation language files were analyzed using a three-dimensional analysis software program. Experimental data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and the Bonferroni multiple comparison test. RESULTS: The narrow shallow group had significantly higher deviation values for trueness than the wide deep group (p < 0.05). The wide deep group had the lowest average deviation value for trueness and there was no significant difference between the narrow deep and wide shallow groups (p > 0.05). For the mean maximum positive deviation, the wide groups had significantly lower values than the narrow groups (p < 0.05). Trueness was affected by both the width and depth(p < 0.05), whereas the mean maximum positive deviation was affected by the width (p < 0.05). The mean maximum negative deviation was affected by all three factors (p < 0.05). Precision was affected by the depth and the interaction between the depth of the occlusal cavity and width of the gingival floor (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The design of different inlay cavity configurations affected the accuracy of the digital intraoral scanner. The highest average deviation for trueness was observed in the narrow shallow group and the lowest in the wide deep group. With regard to precision, the narrow shallow group showed the lowest average deviation, and the narrow deep group showed highest value.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10367335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103673352023-07-26 Scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner according to different inlay preparation designs Park, Yeri Kim, Jae-Hoon Park, Jeong-Kil Son, Sung-Ae BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: The accuracy of intraoral scanning plays a crucial role in the workflow of computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing. However, data regarding scanning accuracy for inlay preparation designs are lacking. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of the depth of the occlusal cavity and width of the gingival floor of the proximal box on the trueness and precision of intraoral scans for inlay restoration. METHODS: Artificial teeth were used in this study. Four types of preparations for mesio-occlusal inlay were performed on each #36 artificial tooth depending on two different depths of the occlusal cavity (1 mm and 2 mm) and widths of the gingival floor of the proximal box (1.5 mm and 2.5 mm). Artificial teeth were scanned 10 times each with Cerec Primescan AC, and another scan was performed subsequently with a laboratory scanner as a reference (n = 10). Standard tessellation language files were analyzed using a three-dimensional analysis software program. Experimental data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and the Bonferroni multiple comparison test. RESULTS: The narrow shallow group had significantly higher deviation values for trueness than the wide deep group (p < 0.05). The wide deep group had the lowest average deviation value for trueness and there was no significant difference between the narrow deep and wide shallow groups (p > 0.05). For the mean maximum positive deviation, the wide groups had significantly lower values than the narrow groups (p < 0.05). Trueness was affected by both the width and depth(p < 0.05), whereas the mean maximum positive deviation was affected by the width (p < 0.05). The mean maximum negative deviation was affected by all three factors (p < 0.05). Precision was affected by the depth and the interaction between the depth of the occlusal cavity and width of the gingival floor (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The design of different inlay cavity configurations affected the accuracy of the digital intraoral scanner. The highest average deviation for trueness was observed in the narrow shallow group and the lowest in the wide deep group. With regard to precision, the narrow shallow group showed the lowest average deviation, and the narrow deep group showed highest value. BioMed Central 2023-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10367335/ /pubmed/37488581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03233-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Park, Yeri
Kim, Jae-Hoon
Park, Jeong-Kil
Son, Sung-Ae
Scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner according to different inlay preparation designs
title Scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner according to different inlay preparation designs
title_full Scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner according to different inlay preparation designs
title_fullStr Scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner according to different inlay preparation designs
title_full_unstemmed Scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner according to different inlay preparation designs
title_short Scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner according to different inlay preparation designs
title_sort scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner according to different inlay preparation designs
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10367335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37488581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03233-2
work_keys_str_mv AT parkyeri scanningaccuracyofanintraoralscanneraccordingtodifferentinlaypreparationdesigns
AT kimjaehoon scanningaccuracyofanintraoralscanneraccordingtodifferentinlaypreparationdesigns
AT parkjeongkil scanningaccuracyofanintraoralscanneraccordingtodifferentinlaypreparationdesigns
AT sonsungae scanningaccuracyofanintraoralscanneraccordingtodifferentinlaypreparationdesigns