Cargando…

Your Cheatin’ Voice Will Tell on You: Detection of Past Infidelity from Voice

Evidence suggests that many physical, behavioral, and trait qualities can be detected solely from the sound of a person’s voice, irrespective of the semantic information conveyed through speech. This study examined whether raters could accurately assess the likelihood that a person has cheated on co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hughes, Susan M., Harrison, Marissa A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10367480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28580806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1474704917711513
_version_ 1785077397563899904
author Hughes, Susan M.
Harrison, Marissa A.
author_facet Hughes, Susan M.
Harrison, Marissa A.
author_sort Hughes, Susan M.
collection PubMed
description Evidence suggests that many physical, behavioral, and trait qualities can be detected solely from the sound of a person’s voice, irrespective of the semantic information conveyed through speech. This study examined whether raters could accurately assess the likelihood that a person has cheated on committed, romantic partners simply by hearing the speaker’s voice. Independent raters heard voice samples of individuals who self-reported that they either cheated or had never cheated on their romantic partners. To control for aspects that may clue a listener to the speaker’s mate value, we used voice samples that did not differ between these groups for voice attractiveness, age, voice pitch, and other acoustic measures. We found that participants indeed rated the voices of those who had a history of cheating as more likely to cheat. Male speakers were given higher ratings for cheating, while female raters were more likely to ascribe the likelihood to cheat to speakers. Additionally, we manipulated the pitch of the voice samples, and for both sexes, the lower pitched versions were consistently rated to be from those who were more likely to have cheated. Regardless of the pitch manipulation, speakers were able to assess actual history of infidelity; the one exception was that men’s accuracy decreased when judging women whose voices were lowered. These findings expand upon the idea that the human voice may be of value as a cheater detection tool and very thin slices of vocal information are all that is needed to make certain assessments about others.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10367480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103674802023-09-07 Your Cheatin’ Voice Will Tell on You: Detection of Past Infidelity from Voice Hughes, Susan M. Harrison, Marissa A. Evol Psychol Original Article Evidence suggests that many physical, behavioral, and trait qualities can be detected solely from the sound of a person’s voice, irrespective of the semantic information conveyed through speech. This study examined whether raters could accurately assess the likelihood that a person has cheated on committed, romantic partners simply by hearing the speaker’s voice. Independent raters heard voice samples of individuals who self-reported that they either cheated or had never cheated on their romantic partners. To control for aspects that may clue a listener to the speaker’s mate value, we used voice samples that did not differ between these groups for voice attractiveness, age, voice pitch, and other acoustic measures. We found that participants indeed rated the voices of those who had a history of cheating as more likely to cheat. Male speakers were given higher ratings for cheating, while female raters were more likely to ascribe the likelihood to cheat to speakers. Additionally, we manipulated the pitch of the voice samples, and for both sexes, the lower pitched versions were consistently rated to be from those who were more likely to have cheated. Regardless of the pitch manipulation, speakers were able to assess actual history of infidelity; the one exception was that men’s accuracy decreased when judging women whose voices were lowered. These findings expand upon the idea that the human voice may be of value as a cheater detection tool and very thin slices of vocal information are all that is needed to make certain assessments about others. SAGE Publications 2017-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10367480/ /pubmed/28580806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1474704917711513 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Hughes, Susan M.
Harrison, Marissa A.
Your Cheatin’ Voice Will Tell on You: Detection of Past Infidelity from Voice
title Your Cheatin’ Voice Will Tell on You: Detection of Past Infidelity from Voice
title_full Your Cheatin’ Voice Will Tell on You: Detection of Past Infidelity from Voice
title_fullStr Your Cheatin’ Voice Will Tell on You: Detection of Past Infidelity from Voice
title_full_unstemmed Your Cheatin’ Voice Will Tell on You: Detection of Past Infidelity from Voice
title_short Your Cheatin’ Voice Will Tell on You: Detection of Past Infidelity from Voice
title_sort your cheatin’ voice will tell on you: detection of past infidelity from voice
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10367480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28580806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1474704917711513
work_keys_str_mv AT hughessusanm yourcheatinvoicewilltellonyoudetectionofpastinfidelityfromvoice
AT harrisonmarissaa yourcheatinvoicewilltellonyoudetectionofpastinfidelityfromvoice