_version_ 1785077417267691520
author Bulen, Benjamin J.
Khazanov, Nickolay A.
Hovelson, Daniel H.
Lamb, Laura E.
Matrana, Marc
Burkard, Mark E.
Yang, Eddy Shih-Hsin
Edenfield, William J.
Claire Dees, Elizabeth
Onitilo, Adedayo A.
Buchschacher, Gary L.
Miller, Alan M.
Parsons, Benjamin M.
Wassenaar, Timothy R.
Suga, Jennifer M.
Siegel, Robert D.
Irvin, William
Nair, Suresh
Slim, Jennifer N.
Misleh, Jamal
Khatri, Jamil
Masters, Gregory A.
Thomas, Sachdev
Safa, Malek M.
Anderson, Daniel M.
Mowers, Jonathan
Dusenbery, Anna C.
Drewery, Stephanie
Plouffe, Komal
Reeder, Travis
Vakil, Hana
Patrias, Lynnae
Falzetta, Amanda
Hamilton, Ryan
Kwiatkowski, Kat
Johnson, D. Bryan
Rhodes, Daniel R.
Tomlins, Scott A.
author_facet Bulen, Benjamin J.
Khazanov, Nickolay A.
Hovelson, Daniel H.
Lamb, Laura E.
Matrana, Marc
Burkard, Mark E.
Yang, Eddy Shih-Hsin
Edenfield, William J.
Claire Dees, Elizabeth
Onitilo, Adedayo A.
Buchschacher, Gary L.
Miller, Alan M.
Parsons, Benjamin M.
Wassenaar, Timothy R.
Suga, Jennifer M.
Siegel, Robert D.
Irvin, William
Nair, Suresh
Slim, Jennifer N.
Misleh, Jamal
Khatri, Jamil
Masters, Gregory A.
Thomas, Sachdev
Safa, Malek M.
Anderson, Daniel M.
Mowers, Jonathan
Dusenbery, Anna C.
Drewery, Stephanie
Plouffe, Komal
Reeder, Travis
Vakil, Hana
Patrias, Lynnae
Falzetta, Amanda
Hamilton, Ryan
Kwiatkowski, Kat
Johnson, D. Bryan
Rhodes, Daniel R.
Tomlins, Scott A.
author_sort Bulen, Benjamin J.
collection PubMed
description Immunotherapy response score (IRS) integrates tumor mutation burden (TMB) and quantitative expression biomarkers to predict anti-PD-1/PD-L1 [PD-(L)1] monotherapy benefit. Here, we evaluated IRS in additional cohorts. Patients from an observational trial (NCT03061305) treated with anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy were included and assigned to IRS-High (-H) versus -Low (-L) groups. Associations with real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined by Cox proportional hazards (CPH) modeling. Those with available PD-L1 IHC treated with anti-PD-(L)1 with or without chemotherapy were separately assessed. Patients treated with PD-(L)1 and/or chemotherapy (five relevant tumor types) were assigned to three IRS groups [IRS-L divided into IRS-Ultra-Low (-UL) and Intermediate-Low (-IL), and similarly assessed]. In the 352 patient anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy validation cohort (31 tumor types), IRS-H versus IRS-L patients had significantly longer rwPFS and OS. IRS significantly improved CPH associations with rwPFS and OS beyond microsatellite instability (MSI)/TMB alone. In a 189 patient (10 tumor types) PD-L1 IHC comparison cohort, IRS, but not PD-L1 IHC nor TMB, was significantly associated with anti-PD-L1 rwPFS. In a 1,103-patient cohort (from five relevant tumor types), rwPFS did not significantly differ in IRS-UL patients treated with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy plus anti-PD-(L)1, nor in IRS-H patients treated with anti-PD-(L)1 versus anti-PD-(L)1 + chemotherapy. IRS associations were consistent across subgroups, including both Europeans and non-Europeans. These results confirm the utility of IRS utility for predicting pan-solid tumor PD-(L)1 monotherapy benefit beyond available biomarkers and demonstrate utility for informing on anti-PD-(L)1 and/or chemotherapy treatment. SIGNIFICANCE: This study confirms the utility of the integrative IRS biomarker for predicting anti-PD-L1/PD-1 benefit. IRS significantly improved upon currently available biomarkers, including PD-L1 IHC, TMB, and MSI status. Additional utility for informing on chemotherapy, anti-PD-L1/PD-1, and anti-PD-L1/PD-1 plus chemotherapy treatments decisions is shown.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10367935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Association for Cancer Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103679352023-07-26 Validation of Immunotherapy Response Score as Predictive of Pan-solid Tumor Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Benefit Bulen, Benjamin J. Khazanov, Nickolay A. Hovelson, Daniel H. Lamb, Laura E. Matrana, Marc Burkard, Mark E. Yang, Eddy Shih-Hsin Edenfield, William J. Claire Dees, Elizabeth Onitilo, Adedayo A. Buchschacher, Gary L. Miller, Alan M. Parsons, Benjamin M. Wassenaar, Timothy R. Suga, Jennifer M. Siegel, Robert D. Irvin, William Nair, Suresh Slim, Jennifer N. Misleh, Jamal Khatri, Jamil Masters, Gregory A. Thomas, Sachdev Safa, Malek M. Anderson, Daniel M. Mowers, Jonathan Dusenbery, Anna C. Drewery, Stephanie Plouffe, Komal Reeder, Travis Vakil, Hana Patrias, Lynnae Falzetta, Amanda Hamilton, Ryan Kwiatkowski, Kat Johnson, D. Bryan Rhodes, Daniel R. Tomlins, Scott A. Cancer Res Commun Research Article Immunotherapy response score (IRS) integrates tumor mutation burden (TMB) and quantitative expression biomarkers to predict anti-PD-1/PD-L1 [PD-(L)1] monotherapy benefit. Here, we evaluated IRS in additional cohorts. Patients from an observational trial (NCT03061305) treated with anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy were included and assigned to IRS-High (-H) versus -Low (-L) groups. Associations with real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined by Cox proportional hazards (CPH) modeling. Those with available PD-L1 IHC treated with anti-PD-(L)1 with or without chemotherapy were separately assessed. Patients treated with PD-(L)1 and/or chemotherapy (five relevant tumor types) were assigned to three IRS groups [IRS-L divided into IRS-Ultra-Low (-UL) and Intermediate-Low (-IL), and similarly assessed]. In the 352 patient anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy validation cohort (31 tumor types), IRS-H versus IRS-L patients had significantly longer rwPFS and OS. IRS significantly improved CPH associations with rwPFS and OS beyond microsatellite instability (MSI)/TMB alone. In a 189 patient (10 tumor types) PD-L1 IHC comparison cohort, IRS, but not PD-L1 IHC nor TMB, was significantly associated with anti-PD-L1 rwPFS. In a 1,103-patient cohort (from five relevant tumor types), rwPFS did not significantly differ in IRS-UL patients treated with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy plus anti-PD-(L)1, nor in IRS-H patients treated with anti-PD-(L)1 versus anti-PD-(L)1 + chemotherapy. IRS associations were consistent across subgroups, including both Europeans and non-Europeans. These results confirm the utility of IRS utility for predicting pan-solid tumor PD-(L)1 monotherapy benefit beyond available biomarkers and demonstrate utility for informing on anti-PD-(L)1 and/or chemotherapy treatment. SIGNIFICANCE: This study confirms the utility of the integrative IRS biomarker for predicting anti-PD-L1/PD-1 benefit. IRS significantly improved upon currently available biomarkers, including PD-L1 IHC, TMB, and MSI status. Additional utility for informing on chemotherapy, anti-PD-L1/PD-1, and anti-PD-L1/PD-1 plus chemotherapy treatments decisions is shown. American Association for Cancer Research 2023-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10367935/ /pubmed/37497337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-23-0036 Text en © 2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bulen, Benjamin J.
Khazanov, Nickolay A.
Hovelson, Daniel H.
Lamb, Laura E.
Matrana, Marc
Burkard, Mark E.
Yang, Eddy Shih-Hsin
Edenfield, William J.
Claire Dees, Elizabeth
Onitilo, Adedayo A.
Buchschacher, Gary L.
Miller, Alan M.
Parsons, Benjamin M.
Wassenaar, Timothy R.
Suga, Jennifer M.
Siegel, Robert D.
Irvin, William
Nair, Suresh
Slim, Jennifer N.
Misleh, Jamal
Khatri, Jamil
Masters, Gregory A.
Thomas, Sachdev
Safa, Malek M.
Anderson, Daniel M.
Mowers, Jonathan
Dusenbery, Anna C.
Drewery, Stephanie
Plouffe, Komal
Reeder, Travis
Vakil, Hana
Patrias, Lynnae
Falzetta, Amanda
Hamilton, Ryan
Kwiatkowski, Kat
Johnson, D. Bryan
Rhodes, Daniel R.
Tomlins, Scott A.
Validation of Immunotherapy Response Score as Predictive of Pan-solid Tumor Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Benefit
title Validation of Immunotherapy Response Score as Predictive of Pan-solid Tumor Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Benefit
title_full Validation of Immunotherapy Response Score as Predictive of Pan-solid Tumor Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Benefit
title_fullStr Validation of Immunotherapy Response Score as Predictive of Pan-solid Tumor Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Benefit
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Immunotherapy Response Score as Predictive of Pan-solid Tumor Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Benefit
title_short Validation of Immunotherapy Response Score as Predictive of Pan-solid Tumor Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Benefit
title_sort validation of immunotherapy response score as predictive of pan-solid tumor anti-pd-1/pd-l1 benefit
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10367935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37497337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-23-0036
work_keys_str_mv AT bulenbenjaminj validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT khazanovnickolaya validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT hovelsondanielh validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT lamblaurae validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT matranamarc validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT burkardmarke validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT yangeddyshihhsin validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT edenfieldwilliamj validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT clairedeeselizabeth validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT onitiloadedayoa validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT buchschachergaryl validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT milleralanm validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT parsonsbenjaminm validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT wassenaartimothyr validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT sugajenniferm validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT siegelrobertd validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT irvinwilliam validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT nairsuresh validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT slimjennifern validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT mislehjamal validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT khatrijamil validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT mastersgregorya validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT thomassachdev validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT safamalekm validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT andersondanielm validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT mowersjonathan validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT dusenberyannac validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT drewerystephanie validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT plouffekomal validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT reedertravis validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT vakilhana validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT patriaslynnae validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT falzettaamanda validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT hamiltonryan validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT kwiatkowskikat validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT johnsondbryan validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT rhodesdanielr validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit
AT tomlinsscotta validationofimmunotherapyresponsescoreaspredictiveofpansolidtumorantipd1pdl1benefit