Cargando…
Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter spp Infection in Critically Ill Patients With Limited Treatment Options: A Descriptive Study of Cefiderocol Therapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic
BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections are difficult to treat and are a significant public health threat due to intrinsic/acquired resistance and limited treatment options. METHODS: A retrospective, observational cohort study in patients receiving cefiderocol via Shionog...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10368198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37496600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad329 |
_version_ | 1785077461748285440 |
---|---|
author | Giannella, Maddalena Verardi, Stefano Karas, Andreas Abdel Hadi, Hasania Dupont, Hervé Soriano, Alex Santerre Henriksen, Anne Cooper, Andrew Falcone, Marco |
author_facet | Giannella, Maddalena Verardi, Stefano Karas, Andreas Abdel Hadi, Hasania Dupont, Hervé Soriano, Alex Santerre Henriksen, Anne Cooper, Andrew Falcone, Marco |
author_sort | Giannella, Maddalena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections are difficult to treat and are a significant public health threat due to intrinsic/acquired resistance and limited treatment options. METHODS: A retrospective, observational cohort study in patients receiving cefiderocol via Shionogi's early access program for Acinetobacter spp infections (1 April 2020–30 April 2021; 27 sites; Italy, Spain, Germany, France). Primary outcome was clinical success, defined as clinical resolution of infection at day 14 or day 28 survival. RESULTS: Overall, 147 patients were included. Primary infection sites were respiratory (65.3%) and bloodstream (unknown source [15.6%]; catheter-related [10.9%]); 24.5% of patients had polymicrobial infection. Of 136 patients in intensive care (92.5%), 85.3% (116/136) received mechanical ventilation. Septic shock (55.6% [70/126]) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (81.6%) were prevalent. Prior to cefiderocol, 85.0% of patients received gram-negative treatment, 61.2% received ≥2 antimicrobials, and most received colistin (58.5%; median duration, 11.5 days). Cefiderocol monotherapy was used in 30.6% of patients. Clinical success rate was 53.1% and was higher in patients without septic shock (62.5%), without COVID-19 (77.8%), and with lower Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores (quartile 1 [median, 3; range, 0–5]: 82.9%). Day 28 survival was 44.9% and was higher in patients without septic shock (60.7%), without COVID-19 (59.3%), with lower SOFA score (quartile 1: 82.9%), and receiving first-line cefiderocol (68.2% [15/22]). Resolution of infection at day 14 occurred in 39.5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Despite use in complex patients with limited treatment options and high septic shock/COVID-19 rates, cefiderocol treatment was associated with an overall clinical success rate of 53%. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10368198 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103681982023-07-26 Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter spp Infection in Critically Ill Patients With Limited Treatment Options: A Descriptive Study of Cefiderocol Therapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic Giannella, Maddalena Verardi, Stefano Karas, Andreas Abdel Hadi, Hasania Dupont, Hervé Soriano, Alex Santerre Henriksen, Anne Cooper, Andrew Falcone, Marco Open Forum Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections are difficult to treat and are a significant public health threat due to intrinsic/acquired resistance and limited treatment options. METHODS: A retrospective, observational cohort study in patients receiving cefiderocol via Shionogi's early access program for Acinetobacter spp infections (1 April 2020–30 April 2021; 27 sites; Italy, Spain, Germany, France). Primary outcome was clinical success, defined as clinical resolution of infection at day 14 or day 28 survival. RESULTS: Overall, 147 patients were included. Primary infection sites were respiratory (65.3%) and bloodstream (unknown source [15.6%]; catheter-related [10.9%]); 24.5% of patients had polymicrobial infection. Of 136 patients in intensive care (92.5%), 85.3% (116/136) received mechanical ventilation. Septic shock (55.6% [70/126]) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (81.6%) were prevalent. Prior to cefiderocol, 85.0% of patients received gram-negative treatment, 61.2% received ≥2 antimicrobials, and most received colistin (58.5%; median duration, 11.5 days). Cefiderocol monotherapy was used in 30.6% of patients. Clinical success rate was 53.1% and was higher in patients without septic shock (62.5%), without COVID-19 (77.8%), and with lower Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores (quartile 1 [median, 3; range, 0–5]: 82.9%). Day 28 survival was 44.9% and was higher in patients without septic shock (60.7%), without COVID-19 (59.3%), with lower SOFA score (quartile 1: 82.9%), and receiving first-line cefiderocol (68.2% [15/22]). Resolution of infection at day 14 occurred in 39.5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Despite use in complex patients with limited treatment options and high septic shock/COVID-19 rates, cefiderocol treatment was associated with an overall clinical success rate of 53%. Oxford University Press 2023-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10368198/ /pubmed/37496600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad329 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Major Article Giannella, Maddalena Verardi, Stefano Karas, Andreas Abdel Hadi, Hasania Dupont, Hervé Soriano, Alex Santerre Henriksen, Anne Cooper, Andrew Falcone, Marco Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter spp Infection in Critically Ill Patients With Limited Treatment Options: A Descriptive Study of Cefiderocol Therapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title | Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter spp Infection in Critically Ill Patients With Limited Treatment Options: A Descriptive Study of Cefiderocol Therapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_full | Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter spp Infection in Critically Ill Patients With Limited Treatment Options: A Descriptive Study of Cefiderocol Therapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_fullStr | Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter spp Infection in Critically Ill Patients With Limited Treatment Options: A Descriptive Study of Cefiderocol Therapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter spp Infection in Critically Ill Patients With Limited Treatment Options: A Descriptive Study of Cefiderocol Therapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_short | Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter spp Infection in Critically Ill Patients With Limited Treatment Options: A Descriptive Study of Cefiderocol Therapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_sort | carbapenem-resistant acinetobacter spp infection in critically ill patients with limited treatment options: a descriptive study of cefiderocol therapy during the covid-19 pandemic |
topic | Major Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10368198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37496600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad329 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giannellamaddalena carbapenemresistantacinetobactersppinfectionincriticallyillpatientswithlimitedtreatmentoptionsadescriptivestudyofcefiderocoltherapyduringthecovid19pandemic AT verardistefano carbapenemresistantacinetobactersppinfectionincriticallyillpatientswithlimitedtreatmentoptionsadescriptivestudyofcefiderocoltherapyduringthecovid19pandemic AT karasandreas carbapenemresistantacinetobactersppinfectionincriticallyillpatientswithlimitedtreatmentoptionsadescriptivestudyofcefiderocoltherapyduringthecovid19pandemic AT abdelhadihasania carbapenemresistantacinetobactersppinfectionincriticallyillpatientswithlimitedtreatmentoptionsadescriptivestudyofcefiderocoltherapyduringthecovid19pandemic AT dupontherve carbapenemresistantacinetobactersppinfectionincriticallyillpatientswithlimitedtreatmentoptionsadescriptivestudyofcefiderocoltherapyduringthecovid19pandemic AT sorianoalex carbapenemresistantacinetobactersppinfectionincriticallyillpatientswithlimitedtreatmentoptionsadescriptivestudyofcefiderocoltherapyduringthecovid19pandemic AT santerrehenriksenanne carbapenemresistantacinetobactersppinfectionincriticallyillpatientswithlimitedtreatmentoptionsadescriptivestudyofcefiderocoltherapyduringthecovid19pandemic AT cooperandrew carbapenemresistantacinetobactersppinfectionincriticallyillpatientswithlimitedtreatmentoptionsadescriptivestudyofcefiderocoltherapyduringthecovid19pandemic AT falconemarco carbapenemresistantacinetobactersppinfectionincriticallyillpatientswithlimitedtreatmentoptionsadescriptivestudyofcefiderocoltherapyduringthecovid19pandemic AT carbapenemresistantacinetobactersppinfectionincriticallyillpatientswithlimitedtreatmentoptionsadescriptivestudyofcefiderocoltherapyduringthecovid19pandemic |