Cargando…
Autograft Cellular Contribution to Spinal Fusion and Effects of Intraoperative Storage Conditions
Controlled animal study. OBJECTIVE. To assess the cellular contribution of autograft to spinal fusion and determine the effects of intraoperative storage conditions on fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Autograft is considered the gold standard graft material in spinal fusion, purportedly due to it...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10368216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37078877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004688 |
_version_ | 1785077465589219328 |
---|---|
author | Lombardo, Jeremy A. Russell, Nick He, Jiawei Larson, Michael J. Walsh, William R. Mundis, Gregory M. Vizesi, Frank |
author_facet | Lombardo, Jeremy A. Russell, Nick He, Jiawei Larson, Michael J. Walsh, William R. Mundis, Gregory M. Vizesi, Frank |
author_sort | Lombardo, Jeremy A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Controlled animal study. OBJECTIVE. To assess the cellular contribution of autograft to spinal fusion and determine the effects of intraoperative storage conditions on fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Autograft is considered the gold standard graft material in spinal fusion, purportedly due to its osteogenic properties. Autograft consists of adherent and non-adherent cellular components within a cancellous bone scaffold. However, neither the contribution of each component to bone healing is well understood nor are the effects of intraoperative storage of autograft. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Posterolateral spinal fusion was performed in 48 rabbits. Autograft groups evaluated included: (1) Viable, (2) partially devitalized, (3) devitalized, (4) dried, and (5) hydrated iliac crest. Partially devitalized and devitalized grafts were rinsed with saline, removing nonadherent cells. Devitalized graft was, in addition, freeze/thawed, lysing adherent cells. For 90 minutes before implantation, air dried iliac crest was left on the back table whereas the hydrated iliac crest was immersed in saline. At 8 weeks, fusion was assessed through manual palpation, radiography, and microcomputed tomography. In addition, the cellular viability of cancellous bone was assayed over 4 hours. RESULTS. Spinal fusion rates by manual palpation were not statistically different between viable (58%) and partially devitalized (86%) autografts (P = 0.19). Both rates were significantly higher than devitalized and dried autograft (both 0%, P < 0.001). In vitro bone cell viability was reduced by 37% after 1 hour and by 63% after 4 hours when the bone was left dry (P < 0.001). Bone cell viability and fusion performance (88%, P < 0.001 vs. dried autograft) were maintained when the graft was stored in saline. CONCLUSIONS. The cellular component of autograft is important for spinal fusion. Adherent graft cells seem to be the more important cellular component in the rabbit model. Autograft left dry on the back table showed a rapid decline in cell viability and fusion but was maintained with storage in saline. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10368216 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103682162023-07-26 Autograft Cellular Contribution to Spinal Fusion and Effects of Intraoperative Storage Conditions Lombardo, Jeremy A. Russell, Nick He, Jiawei Larson, Michael J. Walsh, William R. Mundis, Gregory M. Vizesi, Frank Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Basic Science Controlled animal study. OBJECTIVE. To assess the cellular contribution of autograft to spinal fusion and determine the effects of intraoperative storage conditions on fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Autograft is considered the gold standard graft material in spinal fusion, purportedly due to its osteogenic properties. Autograft consists of adherent and non-adherent cellular components within a cancellous bone scaffold. However, neither the contribution of each component to bone healing is well understood nor are the effects of intraoperative storage of autograft. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Posterolateral spinal fusion was performed in 48 rabbits. Autograft groups evaluated included: (1) Viable, (2) partially devitalized, (3) devitalized, (4) dried, and (5) hydrated iliac crest. Partially devitalized and devitalized grafts were rinsed with saline, removing nonadherent cells. Devitalized graft was, in addition, freeze/thawed, lysing adherent cells. For 90 minutes before implantation, air dried iliac crest was left on the back table whereas the hydrated iliac crest was immersed in saline. At 8 weeks, fusion was assessed through manual palpation, radiography, and microcomputed tomography. In addition, the cellular viability of cancellous bone was assayed over 4 hours. RESULTS. Spinal fusion rates by manual palpation were not statistically different between viable (58%) and partially devitalized (86%) autografts (P = 0.19). Both rates were significantly higher than devitalized and dried autograft (both 0%, P < 0.001). In vitro bone cell viability was reduced by 37% after 1 hour and by 63% after 4 hours when the bone was left dry (P < 0.001). Bone cell viability and fusion performance (88%, P < 0.001 vs. dried autograft) were maintained when the graft was stored in saline. CONCLUSIONS. The cellular component of autograft is important for spinal fusion. Adherent graft cells seem to be the more important cellular component in the rabbit model. Autograft left dry on the back table showed a rapid decline in cell viability and fusion but was maintained with storage in saline. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-08-15 2023-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10368216/ /pubmed/37078877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004688 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Basic Science Lombardo, Jeremy A. Russell, Nick He, Jiawei Larson, Michael J. Walsh, William R. Mundis, Gregory M. Vizesi, Frank Autograft Cellular Contribution to Spinal Fusion and Effects of Intraoperative Storage Conditions |
title | Autograft Cellular Contribution to Spinal Fusion and Effects of Intraoperative Storage Conditions |
title_full | Autograft Cellular Contribution to Spinal Fusion and Effects of Intraoperative Storage Conditions |
title_fullStr | Autograft Cellular Contribution to Spinal Fusion and Effects of Intraoperative Storage Conditions |
title_full_unstemmed | Autograft Cellular Contribution to Spinal Fusion and Effects of Intraoperative Storage Conditions |
title_short | Autograft Cellular Contribution to Spinal Fusion and Effects of Intraoperative Storage Conditions |
title_sort | autograft cellular contribution to spinal fusion and effects of intraoperative storage conditions |
topic | Basic Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10368216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37078877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004688 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lombardojeremya autograftcellularcontributiontospinalfusionandeffectsofintraoperativestorageconditions AT russellnick autograftcellularcontributiontospinalfusionandeffectsofintraoperativestorageconditions AT hejiawei autograftcellularcontributiontospinalfusionandeffectsofintraoperativestorageconditions AT larsonmichaelj autograftcellularcontributiontospinalfusionandeffectsofintraoperativestorageconditions AT walshwilliamr autograftcellularcontributiontospinalfusionandeffectsofintraoperativestorageconditions AT mundisgregorym autograftcellularcontributiontospinalfusionandeffectsofintraoperativestorageconditions AT vizesifrank autograftcellularcontributiontospinalfusionandeffectsofintraoperativestorageconditions |