Cargando…

Autograft Cellular Contribution to Spinal Fusion and Effects of Intraoperative Storage Conditions

Controlled animal study. OBJECTIVE. To assess the cellular contribution of autograft to spinal fusion and determine the effects of intraoperative storage conditions on fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Autograft is considered the gold standard graft material in spinal fusion, purportedly due to it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lombardo, Jeremy A., Russell, Nick, He, Jiawei, Larson, Michael J., Walsh, William R., Mundis, Gregory M., Vizesi, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10368216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37078877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004688
_version_ 1785077465589219328
author Lombardo, Jeremy A.
Russell, Nick
He, Jiawei
Larson, Michael J.
Walsh, William R.
Mundis, Gregory M.
Vizesi, Frank
author_facet Lombardo, Jeremy A.
Russell, Nick
He, Jiawei
Larson, Michael J.
Walsh, William R.
Mundis, Gregory M.
Vizesi, Frank
author_sort Lombardo, Jeremy A.
collection PubMed
description Controlled animal study. OBJECTIVE. To assess the cellular contribution of autograft to spinal fusion and determine the effects of intraoperative storage conditions on fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Autograft is considered the gold standard graft material in spinal fusion, purportedly due to its osteogenic properties. Autograft consists of adherent and non-adherent cellular components within a cancellous bone scaffold. However, neither the contribution of each component to bone healing is well understood nor are the effects of intraoperative storage of autograft. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Posterolateral spinal fusion was performed in 48 rabbits. Autograft groups evaluated included: (1) Viable, (2) partially devitalized, (3) devitalized, (4) dried, and (5) hydrated iliac crest. Partially devitalized and devitalized grafts were rinsed with saline, removing nonadherent cells. Devitalized graft was, in addition, freeze/thawed, lysing adherent cells. For 90 minutes before implantation, air dried iliac crest was left on the back table whereas the hydrated iliac crest was immersed in saline. At 8 weeks, fusion was assessed through manual palpation, radiography, and microcomputed tomography. In addition, the cellular viability of cancellous bone was assayed over 4 hours. RESULTS. Spinal fusion rates by manual palpation were not statistically different between viable (58%) and partially devitalized (86%) autografts (P = 0.19). Both rates were significantly higher than devitalized and dried autograft (both 0%, P < 0.001). In vitro bone cell viability was reduced by 37% after 1 hour and by 63% after 4 hours when the bone was left dry (P < 0.001). Bone cell viability and fusion performance (88%, P < 0.001 vs. dried autograft) were maintained when the graft was stored in saline. CONCLUSIONS. The cellular component of autograft is important for spinal fusion. Adherent graft cells seem to be the more important cellular component in the rabbit model. Autograft left dry on the back table showed a rapid decline in cell viability and fusion but was maintained with storage in saline.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10368216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103682162023-07-26 Autograft Cellular Contribution to Spinal Fusion and Effects of Intraoperative Storage Conditions Lombardo, Jeremy A. Russell, Nick He, Jiawei Larson, Michael J. Walsh, William R. Mundis, Gregory M. Vizesi, Frank Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Basic Science Controlled animal study. OBJECTIVE. To assess the cellular contribution of autograft to spinal fusion and determine the effects of intraoperative storage conditions on fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Autograft is considered the gold standard graft material in spinal fusion, purportedly due to its osteogenic properties. Autograft consists of adherent and non-adherent cellular components within a cancellous bone scaffold. However, neither the contribution of each component to bone healing is well understood nor are the effects of intraoperative storage of autograft. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Posterolateral spinal fusion was performed in 48 rabbits. Autograft groups evaluated included: (1) Viable, (2) partially devitalized, (3) devitalized, (4) dried, and (5) hydrated iliac crest. Partially devitalized and devitalized grafts were rinsed with saline, removing nonadherent cells. Devitalized graft was, in addition, freeze/thawed, lysing adherent cells. For 90 minutes before implantation, air dried iliac crest was left on the back table whereas the hydrated iliac crest was immersed in saline. At 8 weeks, fusion was assessed through manual palpation, radiography, and microcomputed tomography. In addition, the cellular viability of cancellous bone was assayed over 4 hours. RESULTS. Spinal fusion rates by manual palpation were not statistically different between viable (58%) and partially devitalized (86%) autografts (P = 0.19). Both rates were significantly higher than devitalized and dried autograft (both 0%, P < 0.001). In vitro bone cell viability was reduced by 37% after 1 hour and by 63% after 4 hours when the bone was left dry (P < 0.001). Bone cell viability and fusion performance (88%, P < 0.001 vs. dried autograft) were maintained when the graft was stored in saline. CONCLUSIONS. The cellular component of autograft is important for spinal fusion. Adherent graft cells seem to be the more important cellular component in the rabbit model. Autograft left dry on the back table showed a rapid decline in cell viability and fusion but was maintained with storage in saline. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-08-15 2023-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10368216/ /pubmed/37078877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004688 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Basic Science
Lombardo, Jeremy A.
Russell, Nick
He, Jiawei
Larson, Michael J.
Walsh, William R.
Mundis, Gregory M.
Vizesi, Frank
Autograft Cellular Contribution to Spinal Fusion and Effects of Intraoperative Storage Conditions
title Autograft Cellular Contribution to Spinal Fusion and Effects of Intraoperative Storage Conditions
title_full Autograft Cellular Contribution to Spinal Fusion and Effects of Intraoperative Storage Conditions
title_fullStr Autograft Cellular Contribution to Spinal Fusion and Effects of Intraoperative Storage Conditions
title_full_unstemmed Autograft Cellular Contribution to Spinal Fusion and Effects of Intraoperative Storage Conditions
title_short Autograft Cellular Contribution to Spinal Fusion and Effects of Intraoperative Storage Conditions
title_sort autograft cellular contribution to spinal fusion and effects of intraoperative storage conditions
topic Basic Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10368216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37078877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004688
work_keys_str_mv AT lombardojeremya autograftcellularcontributiontospinalfusionandeffectsofintraoperativestorageconditions
AT russellnick autograftcellularcontributiontospinalfusionandeffectsofintraoperativestorageconditions
AT hejiawei autograftcellularcontributiontospinalfusionandeffectsofintraoperativestorageconditions
AT larsonmichaelj autograftcellularcontributiontospinalfusionandeffectsofintraoperativestorageconditions
AT walshwilliamr autograftcellularcontributiontospinalfusionandeffectsofintraoperativestorageconditions
AT mundisgregorym autograftcellularcontributiontospinalfusionandeffectsofintraoperativestorageconditions
AT vizesifrank autograftcellularcontributiontospinalfusionandeffectsofintraoperativestorageconditions