Cargando…

Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Lumbar Decompression or Sequestrectomy in Patients Over 75 Years

Decompression or sequestrectomy in the lumbar spine can be performed under general (GA) or regional anesthesia. In elderly patients, it is still not clear, which procedure should be chosen. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that spinal anesthesia (SA) is a safe choice for lumbar decompression or sequestrect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kindris, Florinella, Zegarek, Gregory, Krappel, Ferdinand A., Perrig, Wolfgang N., Schmid, Samuel L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10368223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37012621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001456
_version_ 1785077466742652928
author Kindris, Florinella
Zegarek, Gregory
Krappel, Ferdinand A.
Perrig, Wolfgang N.
Schmid, Samuel L.
author_facet Kindris, Florinella
Zegarek, Gregory
Krappel, Ferdinand A.
Perrig, Wolfgang N.
Schmid, Samuel L.
author_sort Kindris, Florinella
collection PubMed
description Decompression or sequestrectomy in the lumbar spine can be performed under general (GA) or regional anesthesia. In elderly patients, it is still not clear, which procedure should be chosen. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that spinal anesthesia (SA) is a safe choice for lumbar decompression or sequestrectomy in elderly patients DESIGN: Retrospective clinical single-center study. PATIENTS SAMPLE: We included 154 patients with ages over 75 years after lumbar decompression or sequestrectomy. The mean age of the patients was 81 years. OUTCOME MEASURES: Perioperative data (blood loss, dural tear, operative and perioperative time, delirium, urinary retention, and hospital stay) and the postoperative 1-year follow-up (visual analog scale and complication rate). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from patients that underwent lumbar decompression or sequestrectomy between January 2019 and December 2020. The data from the GA and SA groups were compared. RESULTS: SA was performed in 56 patients whereas 98 patients received a GA. There was no clinically relevant difference between both groups with comparable complication rates. The time of surgery, blood loss, perioperative time, and hospital stay time were significantly less in the SA group. CONCLUSIONS: SA and GA are both safe and reliable procedures for lumbar decompression or sequestrectomy in elderly patients with no clinically relevant difference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10368223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103682232023-07-26 Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Lumbar Decompression or Sequestrectomy in Patients Over 75 Years Kindris, Florinella Zegarek, Gregory Krappel, Ferdinand A. Perrig, Wolfgang N. Schmid, Samuel L. Clin Spine Surg Primary Research Decompression or sequestrectomy in the lumbar spine can be performed under general (GA) or regional anesthesia. In elderly patients, it is still not clear, which procedure should be chosen. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that spinal anesthesia (SA) is a safe choice for lumbar decompression or sequestrectomy in elderly patients DESIGN: Retrospective clinical single-center study. PATIENTS SAMPLE: We included 154 patients with ages over 75 years after lumbar decompression or sequestrectomy. The mean age of the patients was 81 years. OUTCOME MEASURES: Perioperative data (blood loss, dural tear, operative and perioperative time, delirium, urinary retention, and hospital stay) and the postoperative 1-year follow-up (visual analog scale and complication rate). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from patients that underwent lumbar decompression or sequestrectomy between January 2019 and December 2020. The data from the GA and SA groups were compared. RESULTS: SA was performed in 56 patients whereas 98 patients received a GA. There was no clinically relevant difference between both groups with comparable complication rates. The time of surgery, blood loss, perioperative time, and hospital stay time were significantly less in the SA group. CONCLUSIONS: SA and GA are both safe and reliable procedures for lumbar decompression or sequestrectomy in elderly patients with no clinically relevant difference. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-08 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10368223/ /pubmed/37012621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001456 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Primary Research
Kindris, Florinella
Zegarek, Gregory
Krappel, Ferdinand A.
Perrig, Wolfgang N.
Schmid, Samuel L.
Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Lumbar Decompression or Sequestrectomy in Patients Over 75 Years
title Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Lumbar Decompression or Sequestrectomy in Patients Over 75 Years
title_full Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Lumbar Decompression or Sequestrectomy in Patients Over 75 Years
title_fullStr Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Lumbar Decompression or Sequestrectomy in Patients Over 75 Years
title_full_unstemmed Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Lumbar Decompression or Sequestrectomy in Patients Over 75 Years
title_short Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Lumbar Decompression or Sequestrectomy in Patients Over 75 Years
title_sort spinal versus general anesthesia for lumbar decompression or sequestrectomy in patients over 75 years
topic Primary Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10368223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37012621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001456
work_keys_str_mv AT kindrisflorinella spinalversusgeneralanesthesiaforlumbardecompressionorsequestrectomyinpatientsover75years
AT zegarekgregory spinalversusgeneralanesthesiaforlumbardecompressionorsequestrectomyinpatientsover75years
AT krappelferdinanda spinalversusgeneralanesthesiaforlumbardecompressionorsequestrectomyinpatientsover75years
AT perrigwolfgangn spinalversusgeneralanesthesiaforlumbardecompressionorsequestrectomyinpatientsover75years
AT schmidsamuell spinalversusgeneralanesthesiaforlumbardecompressionorsequestrectomyinpatientsover75years