Cargando…
Cross-checking journalistic fact-checkers: The role of sampling and scaling in interpreting false and misleading statements
Professional fact-checkers and fact-checking organizations provide a critical public service. Skeptics of modern media, however, often question the accuracy and objectivity of fact-checkers. The current study assessed agreement among two independent fact-checkers, The Washington Post and PolitiFact,...
Autores principales: | Markowitz, David M., Levine, Timothy R., Serota, Kim B., Moore, Alivia D. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10368232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37490489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289004 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Checking facts and fighting back: Why journalists should defend their profession
por: Pingree, Raymond J., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Statement of Principles for Health Care Journalists
por: Schwitzer, Gary
Publicado: (2005) -
Characteristics of Facebook’s third-party medical fact
checkers
por: Haslam, Alyson, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Journalistic Fact-Checking of Information in Pandemic: Stakeholders, Hoaxes, and Strategies to Fight Disinformation during the COVID-19 Crisis in Spain
por: López-García, Xosé, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
New checker module: BibCheck & MultiEdit in one tool
por: SEMITSOGLOU TSIAPOS, Dimitri
Publicado: (2015)