Cargando…

Clinical outcomes and complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone–patellar tendon–bone in patient Tanner 3 and 4: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Clinical outcomes and potential complications associated with Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone (BPTB) graft in skeletally immature ACL reconstruction (ACLR) are poorly defined. Considering that in Tanner 1–2 patients this kind of graft is not recommended, we focused our systematic review on the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turati, Marco, Caliandro, Marco, Gaddi, Diego, Piatti, Massimiliano, Rigamonti, Luca, Zanchi, Nicolò, Di Benedetto, Paolo, Boerci, Linda, Catalano, Marcello, Zatti, Giovanni, Ollivier, Matthieu, Bigoni, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Paris 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10368545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36307618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00590-022-03402-z
_version_ 1785077528403116032
author Turati, Marco
Caliandro, Marco
Gaddi, Diego
Piatti, Massimiliano
Rigamonti, Luca
Zanchi, Nicolò
Di Benedetto, Paolo
Boerci, Linda
Catalano, Marcello
Zatti, Giovanni
Ollivier, Matthieu
Bigoni, Marco
author_facet Turati, Marco
Caliandro, Marco
Gaddi, Diego
Piatti, Massimiliano
Rigamonti, Luca
Zanchi, Nicolò
Di Benedetto, Paolo
Boerci, Linda
Catalano, Marcello
Zatti, Giovanni
Ollivier, Matthieu
Bigoni, Marco
author_sort Turati, Marco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical outcomes and potential complications associated with Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone (BPTB) graft in skeletally immature ACL reconstruction (ACLR) are poorly defined. Considering that in Tanner 1–2 patients this kind of graft is not recommended, we focused our systematic review on the evaluation of all the studies in the literature that reported clinical outcomes and rate of complications of the ACLR using BPTB graft in Tanner 3–4 patients. METHODS: This review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Scopus were examined from 1965 to 2020 using different combinations of the following keywords: “ACL reconstruction”, “skeletally immature”, “young”, “patellar tendon” and “BPTB”. The database search yielded 742 studies, on which we performed a primary evaluation. After carrying out a full-text evaluation for the inclusion criteria, 4 studies were included in the final review and assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. Ninety-six cases with mean age of 14.2 years were reported. RESULTS: Good stability and functional outcomes were reported with a mean follow-up of 49.5 months. Return to sport rate ranged from 91.7% to 100%. A KT-1000 side-to-side difference higher than 5 mm was observed in five patients (5.2%). No lower limb length discrepancy and angulation were reported. Graft rupture rate was 5.2%. CONCLUSION: According to these results, BTPB graft could be a good choice in Tanner 3–4 patients who want to achieve their preinjury sport level with a low risk of growth disturbances and graft failure. Further investigations in a wider population are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10368545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Paris
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103685452023-07-27 Clinical outcomes and complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone–patellar tendon–bone in patient Tanner 3 and 4: a systematic review Turati, Marco Caliandro, Marco Gaddi, Diego Piatti, Massimiliano Rigamonti, Luca Zanchi, Nicolò Di Benedetto, Paolo Boerci, Linda Catalano, Marcello Zatti, Giovanni Ollivier, Matthieu Bigoni, Marco Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol General Review BACKGROUND: Clinical outcomes and potential complications associated with Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone (BPTB) graft in skeletally immature ACL reconstruction (ACLR) are poorly defined. Considering that in Tanner 1–2 patients this kind of graft is not recommended, we focused our systematic review on the evaluation of all the studies in the literature that reported clinical outcomes and rate of complications of the ACLR using BPTB graft in Tanner 3–4 patients. METHODS: This review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Scopus were examined from 1965 to 2020 using different combinations of the following keywords: “ACL reconstruction”, “skeletally immature”, “young”, “patellar tendon” and “BPTB”. The database search yielded 742 studies, on which we performed a primary evaluation. After carrying out a full-text evaluation for the inclusion criteria, 4 studies were included in the final review and assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. Ninety-six cases with mean age of 14.2 years were reported. RESULTS: Good stability and functional outcomes were reported with a mean follow-up of 49.5 months. Return to sport rate ranged from 91.7% to 100%. A KT-1000 side-to-side difference higher than 5 mm was observed in five patients (5.2%). No lower limb length discrepancy and angulation were reported. Graft rupture rate was 5.2%. CONCLUSION: According to these results, BTPB graft could be a good choice in Tanner 3–4 patients who want to achieve their preinjury sport level with a low risk of growth disturbances and graft failure. Further investigations in a wider population are needed. Springer Paris 2022-10-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10368545/ /pubmed/36307618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00590-022-03402-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle General Review
Turati, Marco
Caliandro, Marco
Gaddi, Diego
Piatti, Massimiliano
Rigamonti, Luca
Zanchi, Nicolò
Di Benedetto, Paolo
Boerci, Linda
Catalano, Marcello
Zatti, Giovanni
Ollivier, Matthieu
Bigoni, Marco
Clinical outcomes and complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone–patellar tendon–bone in patient Tanner 3 and 4: a systematic review
title Clinical outcomes and complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone–patellar tendon–bone in patient Tanner 3 and 4: a systematic review
title_full Clinical outcomes and complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone–patellar tendon–bone in patient Tanner 3 and 4: a systematic review
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes and complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone–patellar tendon–bone in patient Tanner 3 and 4: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes and complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone–patellar tendon–bone in patient Tanner 3 and 4: a systematic review
title_short Clinical outcomes and complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone–patellar tendon–bone in patient Tanner 3 and 4: a systematic review
title_sort clinical outcomes and complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone–patellar tendon–bone in patient tanner 3 and 4: a systematic review
topic General Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10368545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36307618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00590-022-03402-z
work_keys_str_mv AT turatimarco clinicaloutcomesandcomplicationsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneinpatienttanner3and4asystematicreview
AT caliandromarco clinicaloutcomesandcomplicationsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneinpatienttanner3and4asystematicreview
AT gaddidiego clinicaloutcomesandcomplicationsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneinpatienttanner3and4asystematicreview
AT piattimassimiliano clinicaloutcomesandcomplicationsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneinpatienttanner3and4asystematicreview
AT rigamontiluca clinicaloutcomesandcomplicationsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneinpatienttanner3and4asystematicreview
AT zanchinicolo clinicaloutcomesandcomplicationsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneinpatienttanner3and4asystematicreview
AT dibenedettopaolo clinicaloutcomesandcomplicationsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneinpatienttanner3and4asystematicreview
AT boercilinda clinicaloutcomesandcomplicationsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneinpatienttanner3and4asystematicreview
AT catalanomarcello clinicaloutcomesandcomplicationsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneinpatienttanner3and4asystematicreview
AT zattigiovanni clinicaloutcomesandcomplicationsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneinpatienttanner3and4asystematicreview
AT olliviermatthieu clinicaloutcomesandcomplicationsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneinpatienttanner3and4asystematicreview
AT bigonimarco clinicaloutcomesandcomplicationsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneinpatienttanner3and4asystematicreview