Cargando…
Quantification of race/ethnicity representation in Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging research in the USA: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Racial and ethnic minoritized groups are disproportionately at risk for Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), but are not sufficiently recruited in AD neuroimaging research in the United States. This is important as sample composition impacts generalizability of findings, biomarker cutoffs, and trea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10368705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37491471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43856-023-00333-6 |
_version_ | 1785077562002636800 |
---|---|
author | Lim, Aaron C. Barnes, Lisa L. Weissberger, Gali H. Lamar, Melissa Nguyen, Annie L. Fenton, Laura Herrera, Jennifer Han, S. Duke |
author_facet | Lim, Aaron C. Barnes, Lisa L. Weissberger, Gali H. Lamar, Melissa Nguyen, Annie L. Fenton, Laura Herrera, Jennifer Han, S. Duke |
author_sort | Lim, Aaron C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Racial and ethnic minoritized groups are disproportionately at risk for Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), but are not sufficiently recruited in AD neuroimaging research in the United States. This is important as sample composition impacts generalizability of findings, biomarker cutoffs, and treatment effects. No studies have quantified the breadth of race/ethnicity representation in the AD literature. METHODS: This review identified median race/ethnicity composition of AD neuroimaging US-based research samples available as free full-text articles on PubMed. Two types of published studies were analyzed: studies that directly report race/ethnicity data (i.e., direct studies), and studies that do not report race/ethnicity but used data from a cohort study/database that does report this information (i.e., indirect studies). RESULTS: Direct studies (n = 719) have median representation of 88.9% white or 87.4% Non-Hispanic white, 7.3% Black/African American, and 3.4% Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, with 0% Asian American, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and American Indian/Alaska Native, Multiracial, and Other Race participants. Cohort studies/databases (n = 44) from which indirect studies (n = 1745) derived are more diverse, with median representation of 84.2% white, 83.7% Non-Hispanic white, 11.6% Black/African American, 4.7% Hispanic/Latino, and 1.75% Asian American participants. Notably, 94% of indirect studies derive from just 10 cohort studies/databases. Comparisons of two time periods using a median split for publication year, 1994–2017 and 2018–2022, indicate that sample diversity has improved recently, particularly for Black/African American participants (3.39% from 1994–2017 and 8.29% from 2018-2022). CONCLUSIONS: There is still underrepresentation of all minoritized groups relative to Census data, especially for Hispanic/Latino and Asian American individuals. The AD neuroimaging literature will benefit from increased representative recruitment of ethnic/racial minorities. More transparent reporting of race/ethnicity data is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10368705 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103687052023-07-27 Quantification of race/ethnicity representation in Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging research in the USA: a systematic review Lim, Aaron C. Barnes, Lisa L. Weissberger, Gali H. Lamar, Melissa Nguyen, Annie L. Fenton, Laura Herrera, Jennifer Han, S. Duke Commun Med (Lond) Article BACKGROUND: Racial and ethnic minoritized groups are disproportionately at risk for Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), but are not sufficiently recruited in AD neuroimaging research in the United States. This is important as sample composition impacts generalizability of findings, biomarker cutoffs, and treatment effects. No studies have quantified the breadth of race/ethnicity representation in the AD literature. METHODS: This review identified median race/ethnicity composition of AD neuroimaging US-based research samples available as free full-text articles on PubMed. Two types of published studies were analyzed: studies that directly report race/ethnicity data (i.e., direct studies), and studies that do not report race/ethnicity but used data from a cohort study/database that does report this information (i.e., indirect studies). RESULTS: Direct studies (n = 719) have median representation of 88.9% white or 87.4% Non-Hispanic white, 7.3% Black/African American, and 3.4% Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, with 0% Asian American, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and American Indian/Alaska Native, Multiracial, and Other Race participants. Cohort studies/databases (n = 44) from which indirect studies (n = 1745) derived are more diverse, with median representation of 84.2% white, 83.7% Non-Hispanic white, 11.6% Black/African American, 4.7% Hispanic/Latino, and 1.75% Asian American participants. Notably, 94% of indirect studies derive from just 10 cohort studies/databases. Comparisons of two time periods using a median split for publication year, 1994–2017 and 2018–2022, indicate that sample diversity has improved recently, particularly for Black/African American participants (3.39% from 1994–2017 and 8.29% from 2018-2022). CONCLUSIONS: There is still underrepresentation of all minoritized groups relative to Census data, especially for Hispanic/Latino and Asian American individuals. The AD neuroimaging literature will benefit from increased representative recruitment of ethnic/racial minorities. More transparent reporting of race/ethnicity data is needed. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10368705/ /pubmed/37491471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43856-023-00333-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Lim, Aaron C. Barnes, Lisa L. Weissberger, Gali H. Lamar, Melissa Nguyen, Annie L. Fenton, Laura Herrera, Jennifer Han, S. Duke Quantification of race/ethnicity representation in Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging research in the USA: a systematic review |
title | Quantification of race/ethnicity representation in Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging research in the USA: a systematic review |
title_full | Quantification of race/ethnicity representation in Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging research in the USA: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Quantification of race/ethnicity representation in Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging research in the USA: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantification of race/ethnicity representation in Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging research in the USA: a systematic review |
title_short | Quantification of race/ethnicity representation in Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging research in the USA: a systematic review |
title_sort | quantification of race/ethnicity representation in alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging research in the usa: a systematic review |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10368705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37491471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43856-023-00333-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT limaaronc quantificationofraceethnicityrepresentationinalzheimersdiseaseneuroimagingresearchintheusaasystematicreview AT barneslisal quantificationofraceethnicityrepresentationinalzheimersdiseaseneuroimagingresearchintheusaasystematicreview AT weissbergergalih quantificationofraceethnicityrepresentationinalzheimersdiseaseneuroimagingresearchintheusaasystematicreview AT lamarmelissa quantificationofraceethnicityrepresentationinalzheimersdiseaseneuroimagingresearchintheusaasystematicreview AT nguyenanniel quantificationofraceethnicityrepresentationinalzheimersdiseaseneuroimagingresearchintheusaasystematicreview AT fentonlaura quantificationofraceethnicityrepresentationinalzheimersdiseaseneuroimagingresearchintheusaasystematicreview AT herrerajennifer quantificationofraceethnicityrepresentationinalzheimersdiseaseneuroimagingresearchintheusaasystematicreview AT hansduke quantificationofraceethnicityrepresentationinalzheimersdiseaseneuroimagingresearchintheusaasystematicreview |