Cargando…

Quantification of race/ethnicity representation in Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging research in the USA: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Racial and ethnic minoritized groups are disproportionately at risk for Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), but are not sufficiently recruited in AD neuroimaging research in the United States. This is important as sample composition impacts generalizability of findings, biomarker cutoffs, and trea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Aaron C., Barnes, Lisa L., Weissberger, Gali H., Lamar, Melissa, Nguyen, Annie L., Fenton, Laura, Herrera, Jennifer, Han, S. Duke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10368705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37491471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43856-023-00333-6
_version_ 1785077562002636800
author Lim, Aaron C.
Barnes, Lisa L.
Weissberger, Gali H.
Lamar, Melissa
Nguyen, Annie L.
Fenton, Laura
Herrera, Jennifer
Han, S. Duke
author_facet Lim, Aaron C.
Barnes, Lisa L.
Weissberger, Gali H.
Lamar, Melissa
Nguyen, Annie L.
Fenton, Laura
Herrera, Jennifer
Han, S. Duke
author_sort Lim, Aaron C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Racial and ethnic minoritized groups are disproportionately at risk for Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), but are not sufficiently recruited in AD neuroimaging research in the United States. This is important as sample composition impacts generalizability of findings, biomarker cutoffs, and treatment effects. No studies have quantified the breadth of race/ethnicity representation in the AD literature. METHODS: This review identified median race/ethnicity composition of AD neuroimaging US-based research samples available as free full-text articles on PubMed. Two types of published studies were analyzed: studies that directly report race/ethnicity data (i.e., direct studies), and studies that do not report race/ethnicity but used data from a cohort study/database that does report this information (i.e., indirect studies). RESULTS: Direct studies (n = 719) have median representation of 88.9% white or 87.4% Non-Hispanic white, 7.3% Black/African American, and 3.4% Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, with 0% Asian American, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and American Indian/Alaska Native, Multiracial, and Other Race participants. Cohort studies/databases (n = 44) from which indirect studies (n = 1745) derived are more diverse, with median representation of 84.2% white, 83.7% Non-Hispanic white, 11.6% Black/African American, 4.7% Hispanic/Latino, and 1.75% Asian American participants. Notably, 94% of indirect studies derive from just 10 cohort studies/databases. Comparisons of two time periods using a median split for publication year, 1994–2017 and 2018–2022, indicate that sample diversity has improved recently, particularly for Black/African American participants (3.39% from 1994–2017 and 8.29% from 2018-2022). CONCLUSIONS: There is still underrepresentation of all minoritized groups relative to Census data, especially for Hispanic/Latino and Asian American individuals. The AD neuroimaging literature will benefit from increased representative recruitment of ethnic/racial minorities. More transparent reporting of race/ethnicity data is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10368705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103687052023-07-27 Quantification of race/ethnicity representation in Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging research in the USA: a systematic review Lim, Aaron C. Barnes, Lisa L. Weissberger, Gali H. Lamar, Melissa Nguyen, Annie L. Fenton, Laura Herrera, Jennifer Han, S. Duke Commun Med (Lond) Article BACKGROUND: Racial and ethnic minoritized groups are disproportionately at risk for Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), but are not sufficiently recruited in AD neuroimaging research in the United States. This is important as sample composition impacts generalizability of findings, biomarker cutoffs, and treatment effects. No studies have quantified the breadth of race/ethnicity representation in the AD literature. METHODS: This review identified median race/ethnicity composition of AD neuroimaging US-based research samples available as free full-text articles on PubMed. Two types of published studies were analyzed: studies that directly report race/ethnicity data (i.e., direct studies), and studies that do not report race/ethnicity but used data from a cohort study/database that does report this information (i.e., indirect studies). RESULTS: Direct studies (n = 719) have median representation of 88.9% white or 87.4% Non-Hispanic white, 7.3% Black/African American, and 3.4% Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, with 0% Asian American, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and American Indian/Alaska Native, Multiracial, and Other Race participants. Cohort studies/databases (n = 44) from which indirect studies (n = 1745) derived are more diverse, with median representation of 84.2% white, 83.7% Non-Hispanic white, 11.6% Black/African American, 4.7% Hispanic/Latino, and 1.75% Asian American participants. Notably, 94% of indirect studies derive from just 10 cohort studies/databases. Comparisons of two time periods using a median split for publication year, 1994–2017 and 2018–2022, indicate that sample diversity has improved recently, particularly for Black/African American participants (3.39% from 1994–2017 and 8.29% from 2018-2022). CONCLUSIONS: There is still underrepresentation of all minoritized groups relative to Census data, especially for Hispanic/Latino and Asian American individuals. The AD neuroimaging literature will benefit from increased representative recruitment of ethnic/racial minorities. More transparent reporting of race/ethnicity data is needed. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10368705/ /pubmed/37491471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43856-023-00333-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Lim, Aaron C.
Barnes, Lisa L.
Weissberger, Gali H.
Lamar, Melissa
Nguyen, Annie L.
Fenton, Laura
Herrera, Jennifer
Han, S. Duke
Quantification of race/ethnicity representation in Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging research in the USA: a systematic review
title Quantification of race/ethnicity representation in Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging research in the USA: a systematic review
title_full Quantification of race/ethnicity representation in Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging research in the USA: a systematic review
title_fullStr Quantification of race/ethnicity representation in Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging research in the USA: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of race/ethnicity representation in Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging research in the USA: a systematic review
title_short Quantification of race/ethnicity representation in Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging research in the USA: a systematic review
title_sort quantification of race/ethnicity representation in alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging research in the usa: a systematic review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10368705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37491471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43856-023-00333-6
work_keys_str_mv AT limaaronc quantificationofraceethnicityrepresentationinalzheimersdiseaseneuroimagingresearchintheusaasystematicreview
AT barneslisal quantificationofraceethnicityrepresentationinalzheimersdiseaseneuroimagingresearchintheusaasystematicreview
AT weissbergergalih quantificationofraceethnicityrepresentationinalzheimersdiseaseneuroimagingresearchintheusaasystematicreview
AT lamarmelissa quantificationofraceethnicityrepresentationinalzheimersdiseaseneuroimagingresearchintheusaasystematicreview
AT nguyenanniel quantificationofraceethnicityrepresentationinalzheimersdiseaseneuroimagingresearchintheusaasystematicreview
AT fentonlaura quantificationofraceethnicityrepresentationinalzheimersdiseaseneuroimagingresearchintheusaasystematicreview
AT herrerajennifer quantificationofraceethnicityrepresentationinalzheimersdiseaseneuroimagingresearchintheusaasystematicreview
AT hansduke quantificationofraceethnicityrepresentationinalzheimersdiseaseneuroimagingresearchintheusaasystematicreview