Cargando…
Endovascular repair of acute vs. subacute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis evaluating the optimal timing for endovascular repair of acute versus subacute uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection. METHOD: PubMed, EMBASE, web of science and Cochrane Library was interrogated to identify Electronic bibliographic studies upda...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502183 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1189750 |
_version_ | 1785077663581339648 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, WenXin Yang, Yang Wu, ZhiYuan Chen, ZuoGuan Diao, YongPeng Lan, Yong Li, YongJun |
author_facet | Zhao, WenXin Yang, Yang Wu, ZhiYuan Chen, ZuoGuan Diao, YongPeng Lan, Yong Li, YongJun |
author_sort | Zhao, WenXin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis evaluating the optimal timing for endovascular repair of acute versus subacute uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection. METHOD: PubMed, EMBASE, web of science and Cochrane Library was interrogated to identify Electronic bibliographic studies updated to January 2023 to collect studies compared the clinical outcomes of endovascular repair for Acute Versus Subacute Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection. Data were aggregated as pooled odds ratios (OR) using the fixed or random effects models according to the significance of heterogeneity, Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated by RevMan 5.3 and applied with fixed or random-effect models. RESULT: A comprehensive literature search found 322 citations published and finally among them 6 studies containing 3,769 patients (acute group 2,642, subacute group 1,127) were included in review. There is an increased risk of 30-day complications (OR = 1.51,95%CI,1.26–1.81) 30-day mortality (OR = 2.39,95%CI, 1.55–3.67) and 1-year mortality (OR = 1.71,95%CI,1.27–2.30) for an acute uTBAD group compared to subacute ones. Similarly, reintervention was more likely in the acute group than in the subacute group (OR = 1.42,95%CI,1.05–1.91). However, no significant differences were found in long-term mortality. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis confirmed that there was no significant difference in the long-term prognosis between the acute and subacute phases in the timing of surgery. However, considering the high incidence of complications, high re-intervention rate and one-year mortality probably caused by high intima fragility in the acute phase, endovascular repair at subacute phase appears to favorably compare with acute strategy. But future studies with adequate patient numbers and longer-term follow-up are necessary to further verify the study conclusion. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021247609, identifier PROSPERO CRD42021247609. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10369003 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103690032023-07-27 Endovascular repair of acute vs. subacute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhao, WenXin Yang, Yang Wu, ZhiYuan Chen, ZuoGuan Diao, YongPeng Lan, Yong Li, YongJun Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis evaluating the optimal timing for endovascular repair of acute versus subacute uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection. METHOD: PubMed, EMBASE, web of science and Cochrane Library was interrogated to identify Electronic bibliographic studies updated to January 2023 to collect studies compared the clinical outcomes of endovascular repair for Acute Versus Subacute Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection. Data were aggregated as pooled odds ratios (OR) using the fixed or random effects models according to the significance of heterogeneity, Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated by RevMan 5.3 and applied with fixed or random-effect models. RESULT: A comprehensive literature search found 322 citations published and finally among them 6 studies containing 3,769 patients (acute group 2,642, subacute group 1,127) were included in review. There is an increased risk of 30-day complications (OR = 1.51,95%CI,1.26–1.81) 30-day mortality (OR = 2.39,95%CI, 1.55–3.67) and 1-year mortality (OR = 1.71,95%CI,1.27–2.30) for an acute uTBAD group compared to subacute ones. Similarly, reintervention was more likely in the acute group than in the subacute group (OR = 1.42,95%CI,1.05–1.91). However, no significant differences were found in long-term mortality. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis confirmed that there was no significant difference in the long-term prognosis between the acute and subacute phases in the timing of surgery. However, considering the high incidence of complications, high re-intervention rate and one-year mortality probably caused by high intima fragility in the acute phase, endovascular repair at subacute phase appears to favorably compare with acute strategy. But future studies with adequate patient numbers and longer-term follow-up are necessary to further verify the study conclusion. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021247609, identifier PROSPERO CRD42021247609. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10369003/ /pubmed/37502183 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1189750 Text en © 2023 Zhao, Yang, Wu, Chen, Diao, Lan and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Zhao, WenXin Yang, Yang Wu, ZhiYuan Chen, ZuoGuan Diao, YongPeng Lan, Yong Li, YongJun Endovascular repair of acute vs. subacute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Endovascular repair of acute vs. subacute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Endovascular repair of acute vs. subacute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Endovascular repair of acute vs. subacute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Endovascular repair of acute vs. subacute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Endovascular repair of acute vs. subacute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | endovascular repair of acute vs. subacute uncomplicated type b aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502183 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1189750 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaowenxin endovascularrepairofacutevssubacuteuncomplicatedtypebaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yangyang endovascularrepairofacutevssubacuteuncomplicatedtypebaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wuzhiyuan endovascularrepairofacutevssubacuteuncomplicatedtypebaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenzuoguan endovascularrepairofacutevssubacuteuncomplicatedtypebaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT diaoyongpeng endovascularrepairofacutevssubacuteuncomplicatedtypebaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lanyong endovascularrepairofacutevssubacuteuncomplicatedtypebaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liyongjun endovascularrepairofacutevssubacuteuncomplicatedtypebaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |