Cargando…

Endovascular repair of acute vs. subacute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis evaluating the optimal timing for endovascular repair of acute versus subacute uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection. METHOD: PubMed, EMBASE, web of science and Cochrane Library was interrogated to identify Electronic bibliographic studies upda...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, WenXin, Yang, Yang, Wu, ZhiYuan, Chen, ZuoGuan, Diao, YongPeng, Lan, Yong, Li, YongJun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502183
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1189750
_version_ 1785077663581339648
author Zhao, WenXin
Yang, Yang
Wu, ZhiYuan
Chen, ZuoGuan
Diao, YongPeng
Lan, Yong
Li, YongJun
author_facet Zhao, WenXin
Yang, Yang
Wu, ZhiYuan
Chen, ZuoGuan
Diao, YongPeng
Lan, Yong
Li, YongJun
author_sort Zhao, WenXin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis evaluating the optimal timing for endovascular repair of acute versus subacute uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection. METHOD: PubMed, EMBASE, web of science and Cochrane Library was interrogated to identify Electronic bibliographic studies updated to January 2023 to collect studies compared the clinical outcomes of endovascular repair for Acute Versus Subacute Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection. Data were aggregated as pooled odds ratios (OR) using the fixed or random effects models according to the significance of heterogeneity, Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated by RevMan 5.3 and applied with fixed or random-effect models. RESULT: A comprehensive literature search found 322 citations published and finally among them 6 studies containing 3,769 patients (acute group 2,642, subacute group 1,127) were included in review. There is an increased risk of 30-day complications (OR = 1.51,95%CI,1.26–1.81) 30-day mortality (OR = 2.39,95%CI, 1.55–3.67) and 1-year mortality (OR = 1.71,95%CI,1.27–2.30) for an acute uTBAD group compared to subacute ones. Similarly, reintervention was more likely in the acute group than in the subacute group (OR = 1.42,95%CI,1.05–1.91). However, no significant differences were found in long-term mortality. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis confirmed that there was no significant difference in the long-term prognosis between the acute and subacute phases in the timing of surgery. However, considering the high incidence of complications, high re-intervention rate and one-year mortality probably caused by high intima fragility in the acute phase, endovascular repair at subacute phase appears to favorably compare with acute strategy. But future studies with adequate patient numbers and longer-term follow-up are necessary to further verify the study conclusion. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021247609, identifier PROSPERO CRD42021247609.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10369003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103690032023-07-27 Endovascular repair of acute vs. subacute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhao, WenXin Yang, Yang Wu, ZhiYuan Chen, ZuoGuan Diao, YongPeng Lan, Yong Li, YongJun Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis evaluating the optimal timing for endovascular repair of acute versus subacute uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection. METHOD: PubMed, EMBASE, web of science and Cochrane Library was interrogated to identify Electronic bibliographic studies updated to January 2023 to collect studies compared the clinical outcomes of endovascular repair for Acute Versus Subacute Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection. Data were aggregated as pooled odds ratios (OR) using the fixed or random effects models according to the significance of heterogeneity, Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated by RevMan 5.3 and applied with fixed or random-effect models. RESULT: A comprehensive literature search found 322 citations published and finally among them 6 studies containing 3,769 patients (acute group 2,642, subacute group 1,127) were included in review. There is an increased risk of 30-day complications (OR = 1.51,95%CI,1.26–1.81) 30-day mortality (OR = 2.39,95%CI, 1.55–3.67) and 1-year mortality (OR = 1.71,95%CI,1.27–2.30) for an acute uTBAD group compared to subacute ones. Similarly, reintervention was more likely in the acute group than in the subacute group (OR = 1.42,95%CI,1.05–1.91). However, no significant differences were found in long-term mortality. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis confirmed that there was no significant difference in the long-term prognosis between the acute and subacute phases in the timing of surgery. However, considering the high incidence of complications, high re-intervention rate and one-year mortality probably caused by high intima fragility in the acute phase, endovascular repair at subacute phase appears to favorably compare with acute strategy. But future studies with adequate patient numbers and longer-term follow-up are necessary to further verify the study conclusion. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021247609, identifier PROSPERO CRD42021247609. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10369003/ /pubmed/37502183 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1189750 Text en © 2023 Zhao, Yang, Wu, Chen, Diao, Lan and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Zhao, WenXin
Yang, Yang
Wu, ZhiYuan
Chen, ZuoGuan
Diao, YongPeng
Lan, Yong
Li, YongJun
Endovascular repair of acute vs. subacute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Endovascular repair of acute vs. subacute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Endovascular repair of acute vs. subacute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Endovascular repair of acute vs. subacute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Endovascular repair of acute vs. subacute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Endovascular repair of acute vs. subacute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort endovascular repair of acute vs. subacute uncomplicated type b aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502183
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1189750
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaowenxin endovascularrepairofacutevssubacuteuncomplicatedtypebaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangyang endovascularrepairofacutevssubacuteuncomplicatedtypebaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wuzhiyuan endovascularrepairofacutevssubacuteuncomplicatedtypebaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenzuoguan endovascularrepairofacutevssubacuteuncomplicatedtypebaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT diaoyongpeng endovascularrepairofacutevssubacuteuncomplicatedtypebaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lanyong endovascularrepairofacutevssubacuteuncomplicatedtypebaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liyongjun endovascularrepairofacutevssubacuteuncomplicatedtypebaorticdissectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis