Cargando…

Dynamic cerebral autoregulation in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review

Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) is a key mechanism that regulates cerebral blood flow (CBF) in response to transient changes in blood pressure (BP). Impairment of dCA could increase vulnerability to hypertensive vascular damage, but also to BP lowering effects of antihypertensive treatment. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heutz, Rachel, Claassen, Jurgen, Feiner, Sanne, Davies, Aaron, Gurung, Dewakar, Panerai, Ronney B, de Heus, Rianne, Beishon, Lucy C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37125762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0271678X231173449
_version_ 1785077693531815936
author Heutz, Rachel
Claassen, Jurgen
Feiner, Sanne
Davies, Aaron
Gurung, Dewakar
Panerai, Ronney B
de Heus, Rianne
Beishon, Lucy C
author_facet Heutz, Rachel
Claassen, Jurgen
Feiner, Sanne
Davies, Aaron
Gurung, Dewakar
Panerai, Ronney B
de Heus, Rianne
Beishon, Lucy C
author_sort Heutz, Rachel
collection PubMed
description Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) is a key mechanism that regulates cerebral blood flow (CBF) in response to transient changes in blood pressure (BP). Impairment of dCA could increase vulnerability to hypertensive vascular damage, but also to BP lowering effects of antihypertensive treatment. The literature remains conflicted on whether dCA is altered in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We summarized available data on dCA in AD and MCI, by searching PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases (inception-January 2022). Eight studies (total n = 443) were included in the qualitative synthesis of which seven were eligible for meta-analysis. All studies used Transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography and transfer function analysis or the autoregulatory index to assess dCA during spontaneous or induced BP fluctuations. Meta-analysis indicated no significant difference between AD, MCI and healthy controls in dCA parameters for spontaneous fluctuations. For induced fluctuations, the available data were limited, but indicative of at least preserved and possibly better autoregulatory functioning in AD and MCI compared to controls. In summary, current evidence does not suggest poorer dCA efficiency in AD or MCI. Further work is needed to investigate dCA in dementia with induced fluctuations controlling for changes in end-tidal carbon dioxide.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10369144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103691442023-07-27 Dynamic cerebral autoregulation in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review Heutz, Rachel Claassen, Jurgen Feiner, Sanne Davies, Aaron Gurung, Dewakar Panerai, Ronney B de Heus, Rianne Beishon, Lucy C J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Review Articles Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) is a key mechanism that regulates cerebral blood flow (CBF) in response to transient changes in blood pressure (BP). Impairment of dCA could increase vulnerability to hypertensive vascular damage, but also to BP lowering effects of antihypertensive treatment. The literature remains conflicted on whether dCA is altered in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We summarized available data on dCA in AD and MCI, by searching PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases (inception-January 2022). Eight studies (total n = 443) were included in the qualitative synthesis of which seven were eligible for meta-analysis. All studies used Transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography and transfer function analysis or the autoregulatory index to assess dCA during spontaneous or induced BP fluctuations. Meta-analysis indicated no significant difference between AD, MCI and healthy controls in dCA parameters for spontaneous fluctuations. For induced fluctuations, the available data were limited, but indicative of at least preserved and possibly better autoregulatory functioning in AD and MCI compared to controls. In summary, current evidence does not suggest poorer dCA efficiency in AD or MCI. Further work is needed to investigate dCA in dementia with induced fluctuations controlling for changes in end-tidal carbon dioxide. SAGE Publications 2023-05-01 2023-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10369144/ /pubmed/37125762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0271678X231173449 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review Articles
Heutz, Rachel
Claassen, Jurgen
Feiner, Sanne
Davies, Aaron
Gurung, Dewakar
Panerai, Ronney B
de Heus, Rianne
Beishon, Lucy C
Dynamic cerebral autoregulation in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review
title Dynamic cerebral autoregulation in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review
title_full Dynamic cerebral autoregulation in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review
title_fullStr Dynamic cerebral autoregulation in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic cerebral autoregulation in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review
title_short Dynamic cerebral autoregulation in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review
title_sort dynamic cerebral autoregulation in alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37125762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0271678X231173449
work_keys_str_mv AT heutzrachel dynamiccerebralautoregulationinalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview
AT claassenjurgen dynamiccerebralautoregulationinalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview
AT feinersanne dynamiccerebralautoregulationinalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview
AT daviesaaron dynamiccerebralautoregulationinalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview
AT gurungdewakar dynamiccerebralautoregulationinalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview
AT paneraironneyb dynamiccerebralautoregulationinalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview
AT deheusrianne dynamiccerebralautoregulationinalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview
AT beishonlucyc dynamiccerebralautoregulationinalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview