Cargando…
Dynamic cerebral autoregulation in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review
Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) is a key mechanism that regulates cerebral blood flow (CBF) in response to transient changes in blood pressure (BP). Impairment of dCA could increase vulnerability to hypertensive vascular damage, but also to BP lowering effects of antihypertensive treatment. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37125762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0271678X231173449 |
_version_ | 1785077693531815936 |
---|---|
author | Heutz, Rachel Claassen, Jurgen Feiner, Sanne Davies, Aaron Gurung, Dewakar Panerai, Ronney B de Heus, Rianne Beishon, Lucy C |
author_facet | Heutz, Rachel Claassen, Jurgen Feiner, Sanne Davies, Aaron Gurung, Dewakar Panerai, Ronney B de Heus, Rianne Beishon, Lucy C |
author_sort | Heutz, Rachel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) is a key mechanism that regulates cerebral blood flow (CBF) in response to transient changes in blood pressure (BP). Impairment of dCA could increase vulnerability to hypertensive vascular damage, but also to BP lowering effects of antihypertensive treatment. The literature remains conflicted on whether dCA is altered in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We summarized available data on dCA in AD and MCI, by searching PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases (inception-January 2022). Eight studies (total n = 443) were included in the qualitative synthesis of which seven were eligible for meta-analysis. All studies used Transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography and transfer function analysis or the autoregulatory index to assess dCA during spontaneous or induced BP fluctuations. Meta-analysis indicated no significant difference between AD, MCI and healthy controls in dCA parameters for spontaneous fluctuations. For induced fluctuations, the available data were limited, but indicative of at least preserved and possibly better autoregulatory functioning in AD and MCI compared to controls. In summary, current evidence does not suggest poorer dCA efficiency in AD or MCI. Further work is needed to investigate dCA in dementia with induced fluctuations controlling for changes in end-tidal carbon dioxide. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10369144 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103691442023-07-27 Dynamic cerebral autoregulation in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review Heutz, Rachel Claassen, Jurgen Feiner, Sanne Davies, Aaron Gurung, Dewakar Panerai, Ronney B de Heus, Rianne Beishon, Lucy C J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Review Articles Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) is a key mechanism that regulates cerebral blood flow (CBF) in response to transient changes in blood pressure (BP). Impairment of dCA could increase vulnerability to hypertensive vascular damage, but also to BP lowering effects of antihypertensive treatment. The literature remains conflicted on whether dCA is altered in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We summarized available data on dCA in AD and MCI, by searching PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases (inception-January 2022). Eight studies (total n = 443) were included in the qualitative synthesis of which seven were eligible for meta-analysis. All studies used Transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography and transfer function analysis or the autoregulatory index to assess dCA during spontaneous or induced BP fluctuations. Meta-analysis indicated no significant difference between AD, MCI and healthy controls in dCA parameters for spontaneous fluctuations. For induced fluctuations, the available data were limited, but indicative of at least preserved and possibly better autoregulatory functioning in AD and MCI compared to controls. In summary, current evidence does not suggest poorer dCA efficiency in AD or MCI. Further work is needed to investigate dCA in dementia with induced fluctuations controlling for changes in end-tidal carbon dioxide. SAGE Publications 2023-05-01 2023-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10369144/ /pubmed/37125762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0271678X231173449 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Heutz, Rachel Claassen, Jurgen Feiner, Sanne Davies, Aaron Gurung, Dewakar Panerai, Ronney B de Heus, Rianne Beishon, Lucy C Dynamic cerebral autoregulation in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review |
title | Dynamic cerebral autoregulation in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review |
title_full | Dynamic cerebral autoregulation in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Dynamic cerebral autoregulation in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Dynamic cerebral autoregulation in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review |
title_short | Dynamic cerebral autoregulation in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review |
title_sort | dynamic cerebral autoregulation in alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37125762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0271678X231173449 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heutzrachel dynamiccerebralautoregulationinalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview AT claassenjurgen dynamiccerebralautoregulationinalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview AT feinersanne dynamiccerebralautoregulationinalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview AT daviesaaron dynamiccerebralautoregulationinalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview AT gurungdewakar dynamiccerebralautoregulationinalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview AT paneraironneyb dynamiccerebralautoregulationinalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview AT deheusrianne dynamiccerebralautoregulationinalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview AT beishonlucyc dynamiccerebralautoregulationinalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairmentasystematicreview |