Cargando…

Post-anesthetic CPS and EQUUS-FAP scores in surgical and non-surgical equine patients: an observational study

BACKGROUND: Equine pain scoring may be affected by the residual effect of anesthetic drugs. OBJECTIVES: To compare pain scores in the hours immediately following anesthetic recovery to baseline pre-anesthetic scores in equine patients undergoing surgical and non-surgical procedures. STUDY DESIGN: Cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reed, Rachel Anne, Krikorian, Anna M., Reynolds, Rose M., Holmes, Brittany T., Branning, Megan M., Lemons, Margaret B., Barletta, Michele, Quandt, Jane E., Burns, Charlotte C., Dantino, Stephanie C., Sakai, Daniel M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502312
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2023.1217034
_version_ 1785077702010601472
author Reed, Rachel Anne
Krikorian, Anna M.
Reynolds, Rose M.
Holmes, Brittany T.
Branning, Megan M.
Lemons, Margaret B.
Barletta, Michele
Quandt, Jane E.
Burns, Charlotte C.
Dantino, Stephanie C.
Sakai, Daniel M.
author_facet Reed, Rachel Anne
Krikorian, Anna M.
Reynolds, Rose M.
Holmes, Brittany T.
Branning, Megan M.
Lemons, Margaret B.
Barletta, Michele
Quandt, Jane E.
Burns, Charlotte C.
Dantino, Stephanie C.
Sakai, Daniel M.
author_sort Reed, Rachel Anne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Equine pain scoring may be affected by the residual effect of anesthetic drugs. OBJECTIVES: To compare pain scores in the hours immediately following anesthetic recovery to baseline pre-anesthetic scores in equine patients undergoing surgical and non-surgical procedures. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical observational study. METHODS: Fifty adult horses undergoing anesthesia for surgical or non-surgical procedures were enrolled. Horses underwent pain scoring using the Composite Pain Score (CPS) and Equine Utrecht University Scale for Facial Assessment of Pain (EQUUS-FAP) prior to anesthesia (T0) and following anesthetic recovery to standing, every hour for 5 h (T1-T5). Data were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed effects model. A post-hoc Dunnett's test for multiple comparisons was performed for variables where an effect was detected. RESULTS: Mean (95% confidence interval) CPS scores for T0-T5 were 1.6 (1.2–2.0), 6.8 (6.0–7.6), 5.1 (4.3–5.9), 4.3 (3.4–5.2), 3.7 (2.8–4.6), and 2.8 (2.0–3.6) and EQUUS-FAP scores were 0.6 (0.3–0.9), 3.0 (2.5–3.5), 1.9 (1.6–2.2), 1.1 (0.8–1.4), 0.6 (0.4–0.8), and 0.7 (0.4–1.0), respectively. For the CPS, scores greater than 5, and for the EQUUS-FAP scores greater than 3, are consistent with minor pain. There was no effect of type of procedure (surgical vs non-surgical) on CPS or EQUUS-FAP scores. There was an effect of time with CPS scores significantly greater than baseline at T1-T5 and EQUUS-FAP scores significantly greater than baseline at T1 and T2. MAIN LIMITATIONS: Discomfort caused by hoisting was not quantified and it was difficult to ascertain if this affected the results. CONCLUSIONS: Post-anesthetic pain scores may be influenced by the residual effect of anesthetic agents for as long as 5 h and 2 h for the CPS and EQUUS-FAP, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10369185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103691852023-07-27 Post-anesthetic CPS and EQUUS-FAP scores in surgical and non-surgical equine patients: an observational study Reed, Rachel Anne Krikorian, Anna M. Reynolds, Rose M. Holmes, Brittany T. Branning, Megan M. Lemons, Margaret B. Barletta, Michele Quandt, Jane E. Burns, Charlotte C. Dantino, Stephanie C. Sakai, Daniel M. Front Pain Res (Lausanne) Pain Research BACKGROUND: Equine pain scoring may be affected by the residual effect of anesthetic drugs. OBJECTIVES: To compare pain scores in the hours immediately following anesthetic recovery to baseline pre-anesthetic scores in equine patients undergoing surgical and non-surgical procedures. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical observational study. METHODS: Fifty adult horses undergoing anesthesia for surgical or non-surgical procedures were enrolled. Horses underwent pain scoring using the Composite Pain Score (CPS) and Equine Utrecht University Scale for Facial Assessment of Pain (EQUUS-FAP) prior to anesthesia (T0) and following anesthetic recovery to standing, every hour for 5 h (T1-T5). Data were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed effects model. A post-hoc Dunnett's test for multiple comparisons was performed for variables where an effect was detected. RESULTS: Mean (95% confidence interval) CPS scores for T0-T5 were 1.6 (1.2–2.0), 6.8 (6.0–7.6), 5.1 (4.3–5.9), 4.3 (3.4–5.2), 3.7 (2.8–4.6), and 2.8 (2.0–3.6) and EQUUS-FAP scores were 0.6 (0.3–0.9), 3.0 (2.5–3.5), 1.9 (1.6–2.2), 1.1 (0.8–1.4), 0.6 (0.4–0.8), and 0.7 (0.4–1.0), respectively. For the CPS, scores greater than 5, and for the EQUUS-FAP scores greater than 3, are consistent with minor pain. There was no effect of type of procedure (surgical vs non-surgical) on CPS or EQUUS-FAP scores. There was an effect of time with CPS scores significantly greater than baseline at T1-T5 and EQUUS-FAP scores significantly greater than baseline at T1 and T2. MAIN LIMITATIONS: Discomfort caused by hoisting was not quantified and it was difficult to ascertain if this affected the results. CONCLUSIONS: Post-anesthetic pain scores may be influenced by the residual effect of anesthetic agents for as long as 5 h and 2 h for the CPS and EQUUS-FAP, respectively. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10369185/ /pubmed/37502312 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2023.1217034 Text en © 2023 Reed, Krikorian, Reynolds, Holmes, Branning, Lemons, Barletta, Quandt, Burns, Dantino and Sakai. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pain Research
Reed, Rachel Anne
Krikorian, Anna M.
Reynolds, Rose M.
Holmes, Brittany T.
Branning, Megan M.
Lemons, Margaret B.
Barletta, Michele
Quandt, Jane E.
Burns, Charlotte C.
Dantino, Stephanie C.
Sakai, Daniel M.
Post-anesthetic CPS and EQUUS-FAP scores in surgical and non-surgical equine patients: an observational study
title Post-anesthetic CPS and EQUUS-FAP scores in surgical and non-surgical equine patients: an observational study
title_full Post-anesthetic CPS and EQUUS-FAP scores in surgical and non-surgical equine patients: an observational study
title_fullStr Post-anesthetic CPS and EQUUS-FAP scores in surgical and non-surgical equine patients: an observational study
title_full_unstemmed Post-anesthetic CPS and EQUUS-FAP scores in surgical and non-surgical equine patients: an observational study
title_short Post-anesthetic CPS and EQUUS-FAP scores in surgical and non-surgical equine patients: an observational study
title_sort post-anesthetic cps and equus-fap scores in surgical and non-surgical equine patients: an observational study
topic Pain Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502312
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2023.1217034
work_keys_str_mv AT reedrachelanne postanestheticcpsandequusfapscoresinsurgicalandnonsurgicalequinepatientsanobservationalstudy
AT krikorianannam postanestheticcpsandequusfapscoresinsurgicalandnonsurgicalequinepatientsanobservationalstudy
AT reynoldsrosem postanestheticcpsandequusfapscoresinsurgicalandnonsurgicalequinepatientsanobservationalstudy
AT holmesbrittanyt postanestheticcpsandequusfapscoresinsurgicalandnonsurgicalequinepatientsanobservationalstudy
AT branningmeganm postanestheticcpsandequusfapscoresinsurgicalandnonsurgicalequinepatientsanobservationalstudy
AT lemonsmargaretb postanestheticcpsandequusfapscoresinsurgicalandnonsurgicalequinepatientsanobservationalstudy
AT barlettamichele postanestheticcpsandequusfapscoresinsurgicalandnonsurgicalequinepatientsanobservationalstudy
AT quandtjanee postanestheticcpsandequusfapscoresinsurgicalandnonsurgicalequinepatientsanobservationalstudy
AT burnscharlottec postanestheticcpsandequusfapscoresinsurgicalandnonsurgicalequinepatientsanobservationalstudy
AT dantinostephaniec postanestheticcpsandequusfapscoresinsurgicalandnonsurgicalequinepatientsanobservationalstudy
AT sakaidanielm postanestheticcpsandequusfapscoresinsurgicalandnonsurgicalequinepatientsanobservationalstudy