Cargando…

Perceptions of an automated benchmarking dashboard for antimicrobial stewardship programs among antimicrobial stewards within the veterans’ health administration: a multicenter qualitative study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a multicenter, try automated dashboard on ASP activities and its acceptance among ASP leaders. DESIGN: Frontline stewards were asked to participate in semi-structured interviews before and after implementation of a web-based ASP information dashboard providing ri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, DeShauna, Marra, Alexandre R., Livorsi, Daniel, Perencevich, Eli, Goto, Michihiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.203
_version_ 1785077762136997888
author Jones, DeShauna
Marra, Alexandre R.
Livorsi, Daniel
Perencevich, Eli
Goto, Michihiko
author_facet Jones, DeShauna
Marra, Alexandre R.
Livorsi, Daniel
Perencevich, Eli
Goto, Michihiko
author_sort Jones, DeShauna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a multicenter, try automated dashboard on ASP activities and its acceptance among ASP leaders. DESIGN: Frontline stewards were asked to participate in semi-structured interviews before and after implementation of a web-based ASP information dashboard providing risk-adjusted benchmarking, longitudinal trends, and analysis of antimicrobial usage patterns at each facility. SETTING: The study was performed at Iowa City VA Health Care System. PARTICIPANTS: ASP team members from nine medical centers in the VA Midwest Health Care Network (VISN 23). METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted pre- and post-implementation, with interview guides informed by clinical experiences and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Participants evaluated the dashboard’s ease of use, applicability to ongoing ASP activities, perceived validity and reliability, and relative advantage over other ASP monitoring systems. RESULTS: Compared to established stewardship data collection and reporting methods, participants found the dashboard more intuitive and accessible, allowing them to reduce dependence on other systems and staff to obtain and share data. Standardized and risk-adjusted rankings were largely accepted as a valuable benchmarking method; however, participants felt their facility’s characteristics significantly influenced the rankings’ validity. Participants recognized staffing, training, and uncertainty with using the dashboard as an intervention tool as barriers to consistent and comprehensive dashboard implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Participants generally accepted the dashboard’s risk-adjusted metrics and appreciated its usability. While creating automated tools to rigorously benchmark antimicrobial use across hospitals can be helpful, the displayed metrics require further validation, and the longitudinal utility of the dashboard warrants additional study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10369443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103694432023-07-27 Perceptions of an automated benchmarking dashboard for antimicrobial stewardship programs among antimicrobial stewards within the veterans’ health administration: a multicenter qualitative study Jones, DeShauna Marra, Alexandre R. Livorsi, Daniel Perencevich, Eli Goto, Michihiko Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a multicenter, try automated dashboard on ASP activities and its acceptance among ASP leaders. DESIGN: Frontline stewards were asked to participate in semi-structured interviews before and after implementation of a web-based ASP information dashboard providing risk-adjusted benchmarking, longitudinal trends, and analysis of antimicrobial usage patterns at each facility. SETTING: The study was performed at Iowa City VA Health Care System. PARTICIPANTS: ASP team members from nine medical centers in the VA Midwest Health Care Network (VISN 23). METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted pre- and post-implementation, with interview guides informed by clinical experiences and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Participants evaluated the dashboard’s ease of use, applicability to ongoing ASP activities, perceived validity and reliability, and relative advantage over other ASP monitoring systems. RESULTS: Compared to established stewardship data collection and reporting methods, participants found the dashboard more intuitive and accessible, allowing them to reduce dependence on other systems and staff to obtain and share data. Standardized and risk-adjusted rankings were largely accepted as a valuable benchmarking method; however, participants felt their facility’s characteristics significantly influenced the rankings’ validity. Participants recognized staffing, training, and uncertainty with using the dashboard as an intervention tool as barriers to consistent and comprehensive dashboard implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Participants generally accepted the dashboard’s risk-adjusted metrics and appreciated its usability. While creating automated tools to rigorously benchmark antimicrobial use across hospitals can be helpful, the displayed metrics require further validation, and the longitudinal utility of the dashboard warrants additional study. Cambridge University Press 2023-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10369443/ /pubmed/37502245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.203 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jones, DeShauna
Marra, Alexandre R.
Livorsi, Daniel
Perencevich, Eli
Goto, Michihiko
Perceptions of an automated benchmarking dashboard for antimicrobial stewardship programs among antimicrobial stewards within the veterans’ health administration: a multicenter qualitative study
title Perceptions of an automated benchmarking dashboard for antimicrobial stewardship programs among antimicrobial stewards within the veterans’ health administration: a multicenter qualitative study
title_full Perceptions of an automated benchmarking dashboard for antimicrobial stewardship programs among antimicrobial stewards within the veterans’ health administration: a multicenter qualitative study
title_fullStr Perceptions of an automated benchmarking dashboard for antimicrobial stewardship programs among antimicrobial stewards within the veterans’ health administration: a multicenter qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions of an automated benchmarking dashboard for antimicrobial stewardship programs among antimicrobial stewards within the veterans’ health administration: a multicenter qualitative study
title_short Perceptions of an automated benchmarking dashboard for antimicrobial stewardship programs among antimicrobial stewards within the veterans’ health administration: a multicenter qualitative study
title_sort perceptions of an automated benchmarking dashboard for antimicrobial stewardship programs among antimicrobial stewards within the veterans’ health administration: a multicenter qualitative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.203
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesdeshauna perceptionsofanautomatedbenchmarkingdashboardforantimicrobialstewardshipprogramsamongantimicrobialstewardswithintheveteranshealthadministrationamulticenterqualitativestudy
AT marraalexandrer perceptionsofanautomatedbenchmarkingdashboardforantimicrobialstewardshipprogramsamongantimicrobialstewardswithintheveteranshealthadministrationamulticenterqualitativestudy
AT livorsidaniel perceptionsofanautomatedbenchmarkingdashboardforantimicrobialstewardshipprogramsamongantimicrobialstewardswithintheveteranshealthadministrationamulticenterqualitativestudy
AT perencevicheli perceptionsofanautomatedbenchmarkingdashboardforantimicrobialstewardshipprogramsamongantimicrobialstewardswithintheveteranshealthadministrationamulticenterqualitativestudy
AT gotomichihiko perceptionsofanautomatedbenchmarkingdashboardforantimicrobialstewardshipprogramsamongantimicrobialstewardswithintheveteranshealthadministrationamulticenterqualitativestudy