Cargando…
Perceptions of an automated benchmarking dashboard for antimicrobial stewardship programs among antimicrobial stewards within the veterans’ health administration: a multicenter qualitative study
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a multicenter, try automated dashboard on ASP activities and its acceptance among ASP leaders. DESIGN: Frontline stewards were asked to participate in semi-structured interviews before and after implementation of a web-based ASP information dashboard providing ri...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.203 |
_version_ | 1785077762136997888 |
---|---|
author | Jones, DeShauna Marra, Alexandre R. Livorsi, Daniel Perencevich, Eli Goto, Michihiko |
author_facet | Jones, DeShauna Marra, Alexandre R. Livorsi, Daniel Perencevich, Eli Goto, Michihiko |
author_sort | Jones, DeShauna |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a multicenter, try automated dashboard on ASP activities and its acceptance among ASP leaders. DESIGN: Frontline stewards were asked to participate in semi-structured interviews before and after implementation of a web-based ASP information dashboard providing risk-adjusted benchmarking, longitudinal trends, and analysis of antimicrobial usage patterns at each facility. SETTING: The study was performed at Iowa City VA Health Care System. PARTICIPANTS: ASP team members from nine medical centers in the VA Midwest Health Care Network (VISN 23). METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted pre- and post-implementation, with interview guides informed by clinical experiences and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Participants evaluated the dashboard’s ease of use, applicability to ongoing ASP activities, perceived validity and reliability, and relative advantage over other ASP monitoring systems. RESULTS: Compared to established stewardship data collection and reporting methods, participants found the dashboard more intuitive and accessible, allowing them to reduce dependence on other systems and staff to obtain and share data. Standardized and risk-adjusted rankings were largely accepted as a valuable benchmarking method; however, participants felt their facility’s characteristics significantly influenced the rankings’ validity. Participants recognized staffing, training, and uncertainty with using the dashboard as an intervention tool as barriers to consistent and comprehensive dashboard implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Participants generally accepted the dashboard’s risk-adjusted metrics and appreciated its usability. While creating automated tools to rigorously benchmark antimicrobial use across hospitals can be helpful, the displayed metrics require further validation, and the longitudinal utility of the dashboard warrants additional study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10369443 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103694432023-07-27 Perceptions of an automated benchmarking dashboard for antimicrobial stewardship programs among antimicrobial stewards within the veterans’ health administration: a multicenter qualitative study Jones, DeShauna Marra, Alexandre R. Livorsi, Daniel Perencevich, Eli Goto, Michihiko Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a multicenter, try automated dashboard on ASP activities and its acceptance among ASP leaders. DESIGN: Frontline stewards were asked to participate in semi-structured interviews before and after implementation of a web-based ASP information dashboard providing risk-adjusted benchmarking, longitudinal trends, and analysis of antimicrobial usage patterns at each facility. SETTING: The study was performed at Iowa City VA Health Care System. PARTICIPANTS: ASP team members from nine medical centers in the VA Midwest Health Care Network (VISN 23). METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted pre- and post-implementation, with interview guides informed by clinical experiences and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Participants evaluated the dashboard’s ease of use, applicability to ongoing ASP activities, perceived validity and reliability, and relative advantage over other ASP monitoring systems. RESULTS: Compared to established stewardship data collection and reporting methods, participants found the dashboard more intuitive and accessible, allowing them to reduce dependence on other systems and staff to obtain and share data. Standardized and risk-adjusted rankings were largely accepted as a valuable benchmarking method; however, participants felt their facility’s characteristics significantly influenced the rankings’ validity. Participants recognized staffing, training, and uncertainty with using the dashboard as an intervention tool as barriers to consistent and comprehensive dashboard implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Participants generally accepted the dashboard’s risk-adjusted metrics and appreciated its usability. While creating automated tools to rigorously benchmark antimicrobial use across hospitals can be helpful, the displayed metrics require further validation, and the longitudinal utility of the dashboard warrants additional study. Cambridge University Press 2023-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10369443/ /pubmed/37502245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.203 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jones, DeShauna Marra, Alexandre R. Livorsi, Daniel Perencevich, Eli Goto, Michihiko Perceptions of an automated benchmarking dashboard for antimicrobial stewardship programs among antimicrobial stewards within the veterans’ health administration: a multicenter qualitative study |
title | Perceptions of an automated benchmarking dashboard for antimicrobial stewardship programs among antimicrobial stewards within the veterans’ health administration: a multicenter qualitative study |
title_full | Perceptions of an automated benchmarking dashboard for antimicrobial stewardship programs among antimicrobial stewards within the veterans’ health administration: a multicenter qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Perceptions of an automated benchmarking dashboard for antimicrobial stewardship programs among antimicrobial stewards within the veterans’ health administration: a multicenter qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Perceptions of an automated benchmarking dashboard for antimicrobial stewardship programs among antimicrobial stewards within the veterans’ health administration: a multicenter qualitative study |
title_short | Perceptions of an automated benchmarking dashboard for antimicrobial stewardship programs among antimicrobial stewards within the veterans’ health administration: a multicenter qualitative study |
title_sort | perceptions of an automated benchmarking dashboard for antimicrobial stewardship programs among antimicrobial stewards within the veterans’ health administration: a multicenter qualitative study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.203 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonesdeshauna perceptionsofanautomatedbenchmarkingdashboardforantimicrobialstewardshipprogramsamongantimicrobialstewardswithintheveteranshealthadministrationamulticenterqualitativestudy AT marraalexandrer perceptionsofanautomatedbenchmarkingdashboardforantimicrobialstewardshipprogramsamongantimicrobialstewardswithintheveteranshealthadministrationamulticenterqualitativestudy AT livorsidaniel perceptionsofanautomatedbenchmarkingdashboardforantimicrobialstewardshipprogramsamongantimicrobialstewardswithintheveteranshealthadministrationamulticenterqualitativestudy AT perencevicheli perceptionsofanautomatedbenchmarkingdashboardforantimicrobialstewardshipprogramsamongantimicrobialstewardswithintheveteranshealthadministrationamulticenterqualitativestudy AT gotomichihiko perceptionsofanautomatedbenchmarkingdashboardforantimicrobialstewardshipprogramsamongantimicrobialstewardswithintheveteranshealthadministrationamulticenterqualitativestudy |