Cargando…
A conceptual framework on the role of backward integration in sustainable access to malaria intervention commodities in Nigeria
BACKGROUND: Over the last two decades, global stakeholders and the Nigerian government have invested approximately $2 billion in malaria control, reducing parasite prevalence to 23% from 42% to 2010. However, there is a risk that the modest gains will be reversed due to unmet resource gaps. Backward...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369737/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37496064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04641-z |
_version_ | 1785077822735253504 |
---|---|
author | Mokuolu, Olugbenga A. Idachaba, Innocent O. Babatunde, Musibau A. Suleiman, Kafayat O. Mokuolu, Toluwani A. Lawal, Lukman Osofisan, Adenike O. |
author_facet | Mokuolu, Olugbenga A. Idachaba, Innocent O. Babatunde, Musibau A. Suleiman, Kafayat O. Mokuolu, Toluwani A. Lawal, Lukman Osofisan, Adenike O. |
author_sort | Mokuolu, Olugbenga A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Over the last two decades, global stakeholders and the Nigerian government have invested approximately $2 billion in malaria control, reducing parasite prevalence to 23% from 42% to 2010. However, there is a risk that the modest gains will be reversed due to unmet resource gaps. Backward integration is presented in this paper as a viable option for sustainable funding of malaria intervention commodities in Nigeria. METHODS: Following a critical appraisal of the resource profile and malaria expenditure, a conceptual framework on backward integration as a means of ensuring long-term supply of malaria intervention commodities was developed. The study analysed secondary annual data from the National Malaria Elimination Programme to estimate commodity needs for the period 2018–2020, as well as total resources committed and the financial gap. RESULTS: The funds needed to implement national malaria interventions from 2018 to 2020 totaled US$ 1,122,332,318, of which US$ 531,228,984 (47.3%) were funded. The Nigerian government contributed 2.5%, the Global Fund (26.7%), the President’s Malaria Initiative (16.5%), and the UK Department for International Development (6.2%). The funding shortfall was $591,103,335, or 52.7% of the needs. Various funding scenarios were evaluated for their relative merits and limitations, including advocacy for more external funding, bank borrowing, increased domestic resources, and backward integration. CONCLUSIONS: The study concluded that backward integration should be used, based on a government-led public-private partnership that will increase local production of malaria intervention commodities that are accessible and affordable through market-based demand and supply arrangements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10369737 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103697372023-07-27 A conceptual framework on the role of backward integration in sustainable access to malaria intervention commodities in Nigeria Mokuolu, Olugbenga A. Idachaba, Innocent O. Babatunde, Musibau A. Suleiman, Kafayat O. Mokuolu, Toluwani A. Lawal, Lukman Osofisan, Adenike O. Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Over the last two decades, global stakeholders and the Nigerian government have invested approximately $2 billion in malaria control, reducing parasite prevalence to 23% from 42% to 2010. However, there is a risk that the modest gains will be reversed due to unmet resource gaps. Backward integration is presented in this paper as a viable option for sustainable funding of malaria intervention commodities in Nigeria. METHODS: Following a critical appraisal of the resource profile and malaria expenditure, a conceptual framework on backward integration as a means of ensuring long-term supply of malaria intervention commodities was developed. The study analysed secondary annual data from the National Malaria Elimination Programme to estimate commodity needs for the period 2018–2020, as well as total resources committed and the financial gap. RESULTS: The funds needed to implement national malaria interventions from 2018 to 2020 totaled US$ 1,122,332,318, of which US$ 531,228,984 (47.3%) were funded. The Nigerian government contributed 2.5%, the Global Fund (26.7%), the President’s Malaria Initiative (16.5%), and the UK Department for International Development (6.2%). The funding shortfall was $591,103,335, or 52.7% of the needs. Various funding scenarios were evaluated for their relative merits and limitations, including advocacy for more external funding, bank borrowing, increased domestic resources, and backward integration. CONCLUSIONS: The study concluded that backward integration should be used, based on a government-led public-private partnership that will increase local production of malaria intervention commodities that are accessible and affordable through market-based demand and supply arrangements. BioMed Central 2023-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10369737/ /pubmed/37496064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04641-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Mokuolu, Olugbenga A. Idachaba, Innocent O. Babatunde, Musibau A. Suleiman, Kafayat O. Mokuolu, Toluwani A. Lawal, Lukman Osofisan, Adenike O. A conceptual framework on the role of backward integration in sustainable access to malaria intervention commodities in Nigeria |
title | A conceptual framework on the role of backward integration in sustainable access to malaria intervention commodities in Nigeria |
title_full | A conceptual framework on the role of backward integration in sustainable access to malaria intervention commodities in Nigeria |
title_fullStr | A conceptual framework on the role of backward integration in sustainable access to malaria intervention commodities in Nigeria |
title_full_unstemmed | A conceptual framework on the role of backward integration in sustainable access to malaria intervention commodities in Nigeria |
title_short | A conceptual framework on the role of backward integration in sustainable access to malaria intervention commodities in Nigeria |
title_sort | conceptual framework on the role of backward integration in sustainable access to malaria intervention commodities in nigeria |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369737/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37496064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04641-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mokuoluolugbengaa aconceptualframeworkontheroleofbackwardintegrationinsustainableaccesstomalariainterventioncommoditiesinnigeria AT idachabainnocento aconceptualframeworkontheroleofbackwardintegrationinsustainableaccesstomalariainterventioncommoditiesinnigeria AT babatundemusibaua aconceptualframeworkontheroleofbackwardintegrationinsustainableaccesstomalariainterventioncommoditiesinnigeria AT suleimankafayato aconceptualframeworkontheroleofbackwardintegrationinsustainableaccesstomalariainterventioncommoditiesinnigeria AT mokuolutoluwania aconceptualframeworkontheroleofbackwardintegrationinsustainableaccesstomalariainterventioncommoditiesinnigeria AT lawallukman aconceptualframeworkontheroleofbackwardintegrationinsustainableaccesstomalariainterventioncommoditiesinnigeria AT osofisanadenikeo aconceptualframeworkontheroleofbackwardintegrationinsustainableaccesstomalariainterventioncommoditiesinnigeria AT mokuoluolugbengaa conceptualframeworkontheroleofbackwardintegrationinsustainableaccesstomalariainterventioncommoditiesinnigeria AT idachabainnocento conceptualframeworkontheroleofbackwardintegrationinsustainableaccesstomalariainterventioncommoditiesinnigeria AT babatundemusibaua conceptualframeworkontheroleofbackwardintegrationinsustainableaccesstomalariainterventioncommoditiesinnigeria AT suleimankafayato conceptualframeworkontheroleofbackwardintegrationinsustainableaccesstomalariainterventioncommoditiesinnigeria AT mokuolutoluwania conceptualframeworkontheroleofbackwardintegrationinsustainableaccesstomalariainterventioncommoditiesinnigeria AT lawallukman conceptualframeworkontheroleofbackwardintegrationinsustainableaccesstomalariainterventioncommoditiesinnigeria AT osofisanadenikeo conceptualframeworkontheroleofbackwardintegrationinsustainableaccesstomalariainterventioncommoditiesinnigeria |