Cargando…

Evaluation of the effectiveness of four alternative approaches for the classical cough test during a urodynamic study in the context of the COVID-19 global pandemic

BACKGROUD: To evaluate four different alternatives to the classical cough test during a urodynamic study in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Patients who needed to undergo a urodynamic study (UDS) at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University between April 2021 and May 2021 were ran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeng, Xiao, Liu, Shuang, Shen, SiHong, Shen, Hong, Luo, De-yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37491209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01296-5
_version_ 1785077825914535936
author Zeng, Xiao
Liu, Shuang
Shen, SiHong
Shen, Hong
Luo, De-yi
author_facet Zeng, Xiao
Liu, Shuang
Shen, SiHong
Shen, Hong
Luo, De-yi
author_sort Zeng, Xiao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUD: To evaluate four different alternatives to the classical cough test during a urodynamic study in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Patients who needed to undergo a urodynamic study (UDS) at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University between April 2021 and May 2021 were randomly selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. During the UDS process, we used four alternative methods to the “cough test”: 1) quickly pressing the bladder area, 2) performing the Valsalva maneuver, 3) performing the Kegel maneuver, and 4) letting the patient close their mouth while performing the cough test. The "cough" waveform amplitudes and characteristics of the graphics were obtained and compared with the classical cough test. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients (89 men, 31 women) were included in the study. There was no significant difference between the cough waveform amplitude induced by the Valsalva maneuver compared with the classical cough test (P = 0.182); there was no significant difference between the cough waveform amplitude induced by the cough test with the mouth closed and the classical cough test (P = 0.342); there was no significant difference between pressing quickly on the bladder area and the classical method (P = 0.076); and there was a significant difference between the data obtained by the Kegel maneuver and the classical method (P < 0.05). The average "cough" amplitudes obtained were 73.14 ± 22.48 cm H2O, 66.17 ± 17.12 cm H2O, 82.93 ± 18.95 cm H2O, 26.50 ± 8.68 cm H2O, and 68.90 ± 20.32 cm H2O by the classical cough test, by quickly pressing the bladder area, by the Valsalva maneuver, by the Kegel maneuver, and by coughing with a closed mouth, respectively. CONCLUSION: Quickly pressing the bladder area, performing the Valsalva maneuver, and letting the patient close their mouth while performing the cough test can all provide effective cough waveforms and amplitudes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: No. 2021–183.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10369750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103697502023-07-27 Evaluation of the effectiveness of four alternative approaches for the classical cough test during a urodynamic study in the context of the COVID-19 global pandemic Zeng, Xiao Liu, Shuang Shen, SiHong Shen, Hong Luo, De-yi BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUD: To evaluate four different alternatives to the classical cough test during a urodynamic study in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Patients who needed to undergo a urodynamic study (UDS) at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University between April 2021 and May 2021 were randomly selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. During the UDS process, we used four alternative methods to the “cough test”: 1) quickly pressing the bladder area, 2) performing the Valsalva maneuver, 3) performing the Kegel maneuver, and 4) letting the patient close their mouth while performing the cough test. The "cough" waveform amplitudes and characteristics of the graphics were obtained and compared with the classical cough test. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients (89 men, 31 women) were included in the study. There was no significant difference between the cough waveform amplitude induced by the Valsalva maneuver compared with the classical cough test (P = 0.182); there was no significant difference between the cough waveform amplitude induced by the cough test with the mouth closed and the classical cough test (P = 0.342); there was no significant difference between pressing quickly on the bladder area and the classical method (P = 0.076); and there was a significant difference between the data obtained by the Kegel maneuver and the classical method (P < 0.05). The average "cough" amplitudes obtained were 73.14 ± 22.48 cm H2O, 66.17 ± 17.12 cm H2O, 82.93 ± 18.95 cm H2O, 26.50 ± 8.68 cm H2O, and 68.90 ± 20.32 cm H2O by the classical cough test, by quickly pressing the bladder area, by the Valsalva maneuver, by the Kegel maneuver, and by coughing with a closed mouth, respectively. CONCLUSION: Quickly pressing the bladder area, performing the Valsalva maneuver, and letting the patient close their mouth while performing the cough test can all provide effective cough waveforms and amplitudes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: No. 2021–183. BioMed Central 2023-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10369750/ /pubmed/37491209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01296-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zeng, Xiao
Liu, Shuang
Shen, SiHong
Shen, Hong
Luo, De-yi
Evaluation of the effectiveness of four alternative approaches for the classical cough test during a urodynamic study in the context of the COVID-19 global pandemic
title Evaluation of the effectiveness of four alternative approaches for the classical cough test during a urodynamic study in the context of the COVID-19 global pandemic
title_full Evaluation of the effectiveness of four alternative approaches for the classical cough test during a urodynamic study in the context of the COVID-19 global pandemic
title_fullStr Evaluation of the effectiveness of four alternative approaches for the classical cough test during a urodynamic study in the context of the COVID-19 global pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the effectiveness of four alternative approaches for the classical cough test during a urodynamic study in the context of the COVID-19 global pandemic
title_short Evaluation of the effectiveness of four alternative approaches for the classical cough test during a urodynamic study in the context of the COVID-19 global pandemic
title_sort evaluation of the effectiveness of four alternative approaches for the classical cough test during a urodynamic study in the context of the covid-19 global pandemic
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37491209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01296-5
work_keys_str_mv AT zengxiao evaluationoftheeffectivenessoffouralternativeapproachesfortheclassicalcoughtestduringaurodynamicstudyinthecontextofthecovid19globalpandemic
AT liushuang evaluationoftheeffectivenessoffouralternativeapproachesfortheclassicalcoughtestduringaurodynamicstudyinthecontextofthecovid19globalpandemic
AT shensihong evaluationoftheeffectivenessoffouralternativeapproachesfortheclassicalcoughtestduringaurodynamicstudyinthecontextofthecovid19globalpandemic
AT shenhong evaluationoftheeffectivenessoffouralternativeapproachesfortheclassicalcoughtestduringaurodynamicstudyinthecontextofthecovid19globalpandemic
AT luodeyi evaluationoftheeffectivenessoffouralternativeapproachesfortheclassicalcoughtestduringaurodynamicstudyinthecontextofthecovid19globalpandemic