Cargando…

Potency and safety analysis of hemp delta-9 products: the hemp vs. cannabis demarcation problem

BACKGROUND: Hemp-derived delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (∆(9) THC) products are freely available for sale across much of the USA, but the federal legislation allowing their sale places only minimal requirements on companies. Products must contain no more than 0.3% ∆(9) THC by dry weight, but no limit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Lee, Malone, Marc, Paulson, Erik, Swider, Josh, Marelius, David, Andersen, Susan, Black, Dominic
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37496090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42238-023-00197-6
_version_ 1785077828835868672
author Johnson, Lee
Malone, Marc
Paulson, Erik
Swider, Josh
Marelius, David
Andersen, Susan
Black, Dominic
author_facet Johnson, Lee
Malone, Marc
Paulson, Erik
Swider, Josh
Marelius, David
Andersen, Susan
Black, Dominic
author_sort Johnson, Lee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hemp-derived delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (∆(9) THC) products are freely available for sale across much of the USA, but the federal legislation allowing their sale places only minimal requirements on companies. Products must contain no more than 0.3% ∆(9) THC by dry weight, but no limit is placed on overall dosage and there is no requirement that products are tested. However, some states—such as Colorado—specifically prohibit products created by “chemically modifying” a natural hemp component. METHODS: Fifty-three ∆(9) THC products were ordered and submitted to InfiniteCAL laboratory for analysis. The lab analysis considered potency, the presence of impurities, and whether the ∆(9) THC present was natural or converted from CBD. The presence of age verification, company-conducted testing, and warning labels was also considered. RESULTS: While 96.2% of products were under the legal ∆9 THC limit, 66.0% differed from their stated dosage by more than 10%, and although 84.9% provided a lab report to customers, 71.1% of these did not check for impurities. Additionally, 49% of products converted CBD to THC to achieve their levels, and only 15.1% performed age verification at checkout. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some positive findings, the results show that hemp ∆(9) THC companies offer inaccurately labeled products that contain more THC than would be allowed in adult-use states. This raises serious issues around consumer safety, and consent when consuming intoxicating products. Steps to boost accountability for companies must be considered by either the industry or lawmakers if intoxicating hemp products are to remain on the market safely. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42238-023-00197-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10369762
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103697622023-07-27 Potency and safety analysis of hemp delta-9 products: the hemp vs. cannabis demarcation problem Johnson, Lee Malone, Marc Paulson, Erik Swider, Josh Marelius, David Andersen, Susan Black, Dominic J Cannabis Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Hemp-derived delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (∆(9) THC) products are freely available for sale across much of the USA, but the federal legislation allowing their sale places only minimal requirements on companies. Products must contain no more than 0.3% ∆(9) THC by dry weight, but no limit is placed on overall dosage and there is no requirement that products are tested. However, some states—such as Colorado—specifically prohibit products created by “chemically modifying” a natural hemp component. METHODS: Fifty-three ∆(9) THC products were ordered and submitted to InfiniteCAL laboratory for analysis. The lab analysis considered potency, the presence of impurities, and whether the ∆(9) THC present was natural or converted from CBD. The presence of age verification, company-conducted testing, and warning labels was also considered. RESULTS: While 96.2% of products were under the legal ∆9 THC limit, 66.0% differed from their stated dosage by more than 10%, and although 84.9% provided a lab report to customers, 71.1% of these did not check for impurities. Additionally, 49% of products converted CBD to THC to achieve their levels, and only 15.1% performed age verification at checkout. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some positive findings, the results show that hemp ∆(9) THC companies offer inaccurately labeled products that contain more THC than would be allowed in adult-use states. This raises serious issues around consumer safety, and consent when consuming intoxicating products. Steps to boost accountability for companies must be considered by either the industry or lawmakers if intoxicating hemp products are to remain on the market safely. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42238-023-00197-6. BioMed Central 2023-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10369762/ /pubmed/37496090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42238-023-00197-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Johnson, Lee
Malone, Marc
Paulson, Erik
Swider, Josh
Marelius, David
Andersen, Susan
Black, Dominic
Potency and safety analysis of hemp delta-9 products: the hemp vs. cannabis demarcation problem
title Potency and safety analysis of hemp delta-9 products: the hemp vs. cannabis demarcation problem
title_full Potency and safety analysis of hemp delta-9 products: the hemp vs. cannabis demarcation problem
title_fullStr Potency and safety analysis of hemp delta-9 products: the hemp vs. cannabis demarcation problem
title_full_unstemmed Potency and safety analysis of hemp delta-9 products: the hemp vs. cannabis demarcation problem
title_short Potency and safety analysis of hemp delta-9 products: the hemp vs. cannabis demarcation problem
title_sort potency and safety analysis of hemp delta-9 products: the hemp vs. cannabis demarcation problem
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37496090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42238-023-00197-6
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonlee potencyandsafetyanalysisofhempdelta9productsthehempvscannabisdemarcationproblem
AT malonemarc potencyandsafetyanalysisofhempdelta9productsthehempvscannabisdemarcationproblem
AT paulsonerik potencyandsafetyanalysisofhempdelta9productsthehempvscannabisdemarcationproblem
AT swiderjosh potencyandsafetyanalysisofhempdelta9productsthehempvscannabisdemarcationproblem
AT mareliusdavid potencyandsafetyanalysisofhempdelta9productsthehempvscannabisdemarcationproblem
AT andersensusan potencyandsafetyanalysisofhempdelta9productsthehempvscannabisdemarcationproblem
AT blackdominic potencyandsafetyanalysisofhempdelta9productsthehempvscannabisdemarcationproblem