Cargando…

The confidante method to measure abortion: implementing a standardized comparative analysis approach across seven contexts

BACKGROUND: Obtaining representative abortion incidence estimates is challenging in restrictive contexts. While the confidante method has been increasingly used to collect this data in such settings, there are several biases commonly associated with this method. Further, there are significant variat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Owolabi, Onikepe O., Giorgio, Margaret, Leong, Ellie, Sully, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37491276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12963-023-00310-0
_version_ 1785077831509737472
author Owolabi, Onikepe O.
Giorgio, Margaret
Leong, Ellie
Sully, Elizabeth
author_facet Owolabi, Onikepe O.
Giorgio, Margaret
Leong, Ellie
Sully, Elizabeth
author_sort Owolabi, Onikepe O.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Obtaining representative abortion incidence estimates is challenging in restrictive contexts. While the confidante method has been increasingly used to collect this data in such settings, there are several biases commonly associated with this method. Further, there are significant variations in how researchers have implemented the method and assessed/adjusted for potential biases, limiting the comparability and interpretation of existing estimates. This study presents a standardized approach to analyzing confidante method data, generates comparable abortion incidence estimates from previously published studies and recommends standards for reporting bias assessments and adjustments for future confidante method studies. METHODS: We used data from previous applications of the confidante method in Côte d’Ivoire, Ethiopia, Ghana, Java (Indonesia), Nigeria, Uganda, and Rajasthan (India). We estimated one-year induced abortion incidence rates for confidantes in each context, attempting to adjust for selection, reporting and transmission bias in a standardized manner. FINDINGS: In each setting, majority of the foundational confidante method assumptions were violated. Adjusting for transmission bias using self-reported abortions consistently yielded the highest incidence estimates compared with other published approaches. Differences in analytic decisions and bias assessments resulted in the incidence estimates from our standardized analysis varying widely from originally published rates. INTERPRETATION: We recommend that future studies clearly state which biases were assessed, if associated assumptions were violated, and how violations were adjusted for. This will improve the utility of confidante method estimates for national-level decision making and as inputs for global or regional model-based estimates of abortion. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12963-023-00310-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10369773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103697732023-07-27 The confidante method to measure abortion: implementing a standardized comparative analysis approach across seven contexts Owolabi, Onikepe O. Giorgio, Margaret Leong, Ellie Sully, Elizabeth Popul Health Metr Research BACKGROUND: Obtaining representative abortion incidence estimates is challenging in restrictive contexts. While the confidante method has been increasingly used to collect this data in such settings, there are several biases commonly associated with this method. Further, there are significant variations in how researchers have implemented the method and assessed/adjusted for potential biases, limiting the comparability and interpretation of existing estimates. This study presents a standardized approach to analyzing confidante method data, generates comparable abortion incidence estimates from previously published studies and recommends standards for reporting bias assessments and adjustments for future confidante method studies. METHODS: We used data from previous applications of the confidante method in Côte d’Ivoire, Ethiopia, Ghana, Java (Indonesia), Nigeria, Uganda, and Rajasthan (India). We estimated one-year induced abortion incidence rates for confidantes in each context, attempting to adjust for selection, reporting and transmission bias in a standardized manner. FINDINGS: In each setting, majority of the foundational confidante method assumptions were violated. Adjusting for transmission bias using self-reported abortions consistently yielded the highest incidence estimates compared with other published approaches. Differences in analytic decisions and bias assessments resulted in the incidence estimates from our standardized analysis varying widely from originally published rates. INTERPRETATION: We recommend that future studies clearly state which biases were assessed, if associated assumptions were violated, and how violations were adjusted for. This will improve the utility of confidante method estimates for national-level decision making and as inputs for global or regional model-based estimates of abortion. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12963-023-00310-0. BioMed Central 2023-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10369773/ /pubmed/37491276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12963-023-00310-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Owolabi, Onikepe O.
Giorgio, Margaret
Leong, Ellie
Sully, Elizabeth
The confidante method to measure abortion: implementing a standardized comparative analysis approach across seven contexts
title The confidante method to measure abortion: implementing a standardized comparative analysis approach across seven contexts
title_full The confidante method to measure abortion: implementing a standardized comparative analysis approach across seven contexts
title_fullStr The confidante method to measure abortion: implementing a standardized comparative analysis approach across seven contexts
title_full_unstemmed The confidante method to measure abortion: implementing a standardized comparative analysis approach across seven contexts
title_short The confidante method to measure abortion: implementing a standardized comparative analysis approach across seven contexts
title_sort confidante method to measure abortion: implementing a standardized comparative analysis approach across seven contexts
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37491276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12963-023-00310-0
work_keys_str_mv AT owolabionikepeo theconfidantemethodtomeasureabortionimplementingastandardizedcomparativeanalysisapproachacrosssevencontexts
AT giorgiomargaret theconfidantemethodtomeasureabortionimplementingastandardizedcomparativeanalysisapproachacrosssevencontexts
AT leongellie theconfidantemethodtomeasureabortionimplementingastandardizedcomparativeanalysisapproachacrosssevencontexts
AT sullyelizabeth theconfidantemethodtomeasureabortionimplementingastandardizedcomparativeanalysisapproachacrosssevencontexts
AT owolabionikepeo confidantemethodtomeasureabortionimplementingastandardizedcomparativeanalysisapproachacrosssevencontexts
AT giorgiomargaret confidantemethodtomeasureabortionimplementingastandardizedcomparativeanalysisapproachacrosssevencontexts
AT leongellie confidantemethodtomeasureabortionimplementingastandardizedcomparativeanalysisapproachacrosssevencontexts
AT sullyelizabeth confidantemethodtomeasureabortionimplementingastandardizedcomparativeanalysisapproachacrosssevencontexts