Cargando…

Needs and expectations for artificial intelligence in emergency medicine according to Canadian physicians

BACKGROUND: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is recognized by emergency physicians (EPs) as an important technology that will affect clinical practice. Several AI-tools have already been developed to aid care delivery in emergency medicine (EM). However, many EM tools appear to have been developed witho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eastwood, Kyle W., May, Ronald, Andreou, Pantelis, Abidi, Samina, Abidi, Syed Sibte Raza, Loubani, Osama M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37491228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09740-w
_version_ 1785077839628861440
author Eastwood, Kyle W.
May, Ronald
Andreou, Pantelis
Abidi, Samina
Abidi, Syed Sibte Raza
Loubani, Osama M.
author_facet Eastwood, Kyle W.
May, Ronald
Andreou, Pantelis
Abidi, Samina
Abidi, Syed Sibte Raza
Loubani, Osama M.
author_sort Eastwood, Kyle W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is recognized by emergency physicians (EPs) as an important technology that will affect clinical practice. Several AI-tools have already been developed to aid care delivery in emergency medicine (EM). However, many EM tools appear to have been developed without a cross-disciplinary needs assessment, making it difficult to understand their broader importance to general-practice. Clinician surveys about AI tools have been conducted within other medical specialties to help guide future design. This study aims to understand the needs of Canadian EPs for the apt use of AI-based tools. METHODS: A national cross-sectional, two-stage, mixed-method electronic survey of Canadian EPs was conducted from January-May 2022. The survey includes demographic and physician practice-pattern data, clinicians’ current use and perceptions of AI, and individual rankings of which EM work-activities most benefit from AI. RESULTS: The primary outcome is a ranked list of high-priority AI-tools for EM that physicians want translated into general use within the next 10 years. When ranking specific AI examples, ‘automated charting/report generation’, ‘clinical prediction rules’ and ‘monitoring vitals with early-warning detection’ were the top items. When ranking by physician work-activities, ‘AI-tools for documentation’, ‘AI-tools for computer use’ and ‘AI-tools for triaging patients’ were the top items. For secondary outcomes, EPs indicated AI was ‘likely’ (43.1%) or ‘extremely likely’ (43.7%) to be able to complete the task of ‘documentation’ and indicated either ‘a-great-deal’ (32.8%) or ‘quite-a-bit’ (39.7%) of potential for AI in EM. Further, EPs were either ‘strongly’ (48.5%) or ‘somewhat’ (39.8%) interested in AI for EM. CONCLUSIONS: Physician input on the design of AI is essential to ensure the uptake of this technology. Translation of AI-tools to facilitate documentation is considered a high-priority, and respondents had high confidence that AI could facilitate this task. This study will guide future directions regarding the use of AI for EM and help direct efforts to address prevailing technology-translation barriers such as access to high-quality application-specific data and developing reporting guidelines for specific AI-applications. With a prioritized list of high-need AI applications, decision-makers can develop focused strategies to address these larger obstacles. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09740-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10369807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103698072023-07-27 Needs and expectations for artificial intelligence in emergency medicine according to Canadian physicians Eastwood, Kyle W. May, Ronald Andreou, Pantelis Abidi, Samina Abidi, Syed Sibte Raza Loubani, Osama M. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is recognized by emergency physicians (EPs) as an important technology that will affect clinical practice. Several AI-tools have already been developed to aid care delivery in emergency medicine (EM). However, many EM tools appear to have been developed without a cross-disciplinary needs assessment, making it difficult to understand their broader importance to general-practice. Clinician surveys about AI tools have been conducted within other medical specialties to help guide future design. This study aims to understand the needs of Canadian EPs for the apt use of AI-based tools. METHODS: A national cross-sectional, two-stage, mixed-method electronic survey of Canadian EPs was conducted from January-May 2022. The survey includes demographic and physician practice-pattern data, clinicians’ current use and perceptions of AI, and individual rankings of which EM work-activities most benefit from AI. RESULTS: The primary outcome is a ranked list of high-priority AI-tools for EM that physicians want translated into general use within the next 10 years. When ranking specific AI examples, ‘automated charting/report generation’, ‘clinical prediction rules’ and ‘monitoring vitals with early-warning detection’ were the top items. When ranking by physician work-activities, ‘AI-tools for documentation’, ‘AI-tools for computer use’ and ‘AI-tools for triaging patients’ were the top items. For secondary outcomes, EPs indicated AI was ‘likely’ (43.1%) or ‘extremely likely’ (43.7%) to be able to complete the task of ‘documentation’ and indicated either ‘a-great-deal’ (32.8%) or ‘quite-a-bit’ (39.7%) of potential for AI in EM. Further, EPs were either ‘strongly’ (48.5%) or ‘somewhat’ (39.8%) interested in AI for EM. CONCLUSIONS: Physician input on the design of AI is essential to ensure the uptake of this technology. Translation of AI-tools to facilitate documentation is considered a high-priority, and respondents had high confidence that AI could facilitate this task. This study will guide future directions regarding the use of AI for EM and help direct efforts to address prevailing technology-translation barriers such as access to high-quality application-specific data and developing reporting guidelines for specific AI-applications. With a prioritized list of high-need AI applications, decision-makers can develop focused strategies to address these larger obstacles. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09740-w. BioMed Central 2023-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10369807/ /pubmed/37491228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09740-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Eastwood, Kyle W.
May, Ronald
Andreou, Pantelis
Abidi, Samina
Abidi, Syed Sibte Raza
Loubani, Osama M.
Needs and expectations for artificial intelligence in emergency medicine according to Canadian physicians
title Needs and expectations for artificial intelligence in emergency medicine according to Canadian physicians
title_full Needs and expectations for artificial intelligence in emergency medicine according to Canadian physicians
title_fullStr Needs and expectations for artificial intelligence in emergency medicine according to Canadian physicians
title_full_unstemmed Needs and expectations for artificial intelligence in emergency medicine according to Canadian physicians
title_short Needs and expectations for artificial intelligence in emergency medicine according to Canadian physicians
title_sort needs and expectations for artificial intelligence in emergency medicine according to canadian physicians
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10369807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37491228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09740-w
work_keys_str_mv AT eastwoodkylew needsandexpectationsforartificialintelligenceinemergencymedicineaccordingtocanadianphysicians
AT mayronald needsandexpectationsforartificialintelligenceinemergencymedicineaccordingtocanadianphysicians
AT andreoupantelis needsandexpectationsforartificialintelligenceinemergencymedicineaccordingtocanadianphysicians
AT abidisamina needsandexpectationsforartificialintelligenceinemergencymedicineaccordingtocanadianphysicians
AT abidisyedsibteraza needsandexpectationsforartificialintelligenceinemergencymedicineaccordingtocanadianphysicians
AT loubaniosamam needsandexpectationsforartificialintelligenceinemergencymedicineaccordingtocanadianphysicians