Cargando…
Estimating error rates for single molecule protein sequencing experiments
The practical application of new single molecule protein sequencing (SMPS) technologies requires accurate estimates of their associated sequencing error rates. Here, we describe the development and application of two distinct parameter estimation methods for analyzing SMPS reads produced by fluorose...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10370102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.18.549591 |
_version_ | 1785077889349189632 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Matthew Beauregard VanderVelden, Kent Blom, Thomas Stout, Heather D. Mapes, James H. Folsom, Tucker M. Martin, Christopher Bardo, Angela M. Marcotte, Edward M. |
author_facet | Smith, Matthew Beauregard VanderVelden, Kent Blom, Thomas Stout, Heather D. Mapes, James H. Folsom, Tucker M. Martin, Christopher Bardo, Angela M. Marcotte, Edward M. |
author_sort | Smith, Matthew Beauregard |
collection | PubMed |
description | The practical application of new single molecule protein sequencing (SMPS) technologies requires accurate estimates of their associated sequencing error rates. Here, we describe the development and application of two distinct parameter estimation methods for analyzing SMPS reads produced by fluorosequencing. A Hidden Markov Model (HMM) based approach, extends whatprot, where we previously used HMMs for SMPS peptide-read matching. This extension offers a principled approach for estimating key parameters for fluorosequencing experiments, including missed amino acid cleavages, dye loss, and peptide detachment. Specifically, we adapted the Baum-Welch algorithm, a standard technique to estimate transition probabilities for an HMM using expectation maximization, but modified here to estimate a small number of parameter values directly rather than estimating every transition probability independently, which should help prevent overfitting. We demonstrate a high degree of accuracy on simulated data, but on experimental datasets, we observed that the model needed to be augmented with an additional error type, N-terminal blocking. This, in combination with data pre-processing, results in reasonable parameterizations of experimental datasets that agree with controlled experimental perturbations. A second independent implementation using a hybrid of DIRECT and Powell’s method to reduce the root mean squared error (RMSE) between simulations and the real dataset was also developed. We compare these methods on both simulated and real data, finding that our Baum-Welch based approach outperforms DIRECT and Powell’s method by most, but not all, criteria. Although some discrepancies between the results exist, we also find that both approaches provide similar error rate estimates from experimental single molecule fluorosequencing datasets. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10370102 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103701022023-07-27 Estimating error rates for single molecule protein sequencing experiments Smith, Matthew Beauregard VanderVelden, Kent Blom, Thomas Stout, Heather D. Mapes, James H. Folsom, Tucker M. Martin, Christopher Bardo, Angela M. Marcotte, Edward M. bioRxiv Article The practical application of new single molecule protein sequencing (SMPS) technologies requires accurate estimates of their associated sequencing error rates. Here, we describe the development and application of two distinct parameter estimation methods for analyzing SMPS reads produced by fluorosequencing. A Hidden Markov Model (HMM) based approach, extends whatprot, where we previously used HMMs for SMPS peptide-read matching. This extension offers a principled approach for estimating key parameters for fluorosequencing experiments, including missed amino acid cleavages, dye loss, and peptide detachment. Specifically, we adapted the Baum-Welch algorithm, a standard technique to estimate transition probabilities for an HMM using expectation maximization, but modified here to estimate a small number of parameter values directly rather than estimating every transition probability independently, which should help prevent overfitting. We demonstrate a high degree of accuracy on simulated data, but on experimental datasets, we observed that the model needed to be augmented with an additional error type, N-terminal blocking. This, in combination with data pre-processing, results in reasonable parameterizations of experimental datasets that agree with controlled experimental perturbations. A second independent implementation using a hybrid of DIRECT and Powell’s method to reduce the root mean squared error (RMSE) between simulations and the real dataset was also developed. We compare these methods on both simulated and real data, finding that our Baum-Welch based approach outperforms DIRECT and Powell’s method by most, but not all, criteria. Although some discrepancies between the results exist, we also find that both approaches provide similar error rate estimates from experimental single molecule fluorosequencing datasets. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10370102/ /pubmed/37502879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.18.549591 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. |
spellingShingle | Article Smith, Matthew Beauregard VanderVelden, Kent Blom, Thomas Stout, Heather D. Mapes, James H. Folsom, Tucker M. Martin, Christopher Bardo, Angela M. Marcotte, Edward M. Estimating error rates for single molecule protein sequencing experiments |
title | Estimating error rates for single molecule protein sequencing experiments |
title_full | Estimating error rates for single molecule protein sequencing experiments |
title_fullStr | Estimating error rates for single molecule protein sequencing experiments |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimating error rates for single molecule protein sequencing experiments |
title_short | Estimating error rates for single molecule protein sequencing experiments |
title_sort | estimating error rates for single molecule protein sequencing experiments |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10370102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.18.549591 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithmatthewbeauregard estimatingerrorratesforsinglemoleculeproteinsequencingexperiments AT vanderveldenkent estimatingerrorratesforsinglemoleculeproteinsequencingexperiments AT blomthomas estimatingerrorratesforsinglemoleculeproteinsequencingexperiments AT stoutheatherd estimatingerrorratesforsinglemoleculeproteinsequencingexperiments AT mapesjamesh estimatingerrorratesforsinglemoleculeproteinsequencingexperiments AT folsomtuckerm estimatingerrorratesforsinglemoleculeproteinsequencingexperiments AT martinchristopher estimatingerrorratesforsinglemoleculeproteinsequencingexperiments AT bardoangelam estimatingerrorratesforsinglemoleculeproteinsequencingexperiments AT marcotteedwardm estimatingerrorratesforsinglemoleculeproteinsequencingexperiments |