Cargando…

CT-based radiostereometric analysis for assessing midfoot kinematics: precision compared with marker-based radiostereometry

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: 3-dimensional midfoot motion is hard to evaluate in clinical practice. We present a new computed tomography (CT)-based radiostereometric analysis (CT-RSA) technique to examine in vivo midfoot kinematics during single-leg stance and compare it with marker-based radiostereometr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: POULSEN, Magnus, STØDLE, Are H, NORDSLETTEN, Lars, RÖHRL, Stephan M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medical Journals Sweden, on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10370411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37493528
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.16905
_version_ 1785077927966146560
author POULSEN, Magnus
STØDLE, Are H
NORDSLETTEN, Lars
RÖHRL, Stephan M
author_facet POULSEN, Magnus
STØDLE, Are H
NORDSLETTEN, Lars
RÖHRL, Stephan M
author_sort POULSEN, Magnus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: 3-dimensional midfoot motion is hard to evaluate in clinical practice. We present a new computed tomography (CT)-based radiostereometric analysis (CT-RSA) technique to examine in vivo midfoot kinematics during single-leg stance and compare it with marker-based radiostereometry (RSA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 8 patients were examined with bilateral non- and full-weight-bearing CT images of the midfoot. 1st tarsometatarsal motion was analyzed using a surface-registration technique (CT-RSA). As all patients had unilateral tantalum markers in the 1st cuneiform (C1) and 1st metatarsal (M1), comparison of precision with markerbased RSA was performed. CT-RSA precision was evaluated with surface registration of both C1–M1 bone and C1–M1 tantalum markers, while RSA precision was determined with C1–M1 markers only. Additionally, to remove motion bias, we evaluated intrasegmental CT-RSA precision by comparing proximal with distal part of M1. RESULTS: Under physical load, the primary movement for the 1st tarsometatarsal joint was M1 dorsiflexion (mean 1.4°), adduction (mean 1.4°), and dorsal translation (mean 1.1 mm). CT-RSA precision, using surface bone or markers, was in the range of 0.3–0.7 mm for translation and 0.6–1.6° for rotation. In comparison, RSA precision was in the range of 0.4–0.9 mm for translation and 1.0–1.7° for rotation. Finally, intrasegmental CT-RSA precision was in the range of 0.1–0.2 mm for translation and 0.4–0.5° for rotation. CONCLUSION: CT-RSA is a valid and precise, non-invasive method to measure midfoot kinematics when compared with conventional RSA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10370411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Medical Journals Sweden, on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103704112023-07-27 CT-based radiostereometric analysis for assessing midfoot kinematics: precision compared with marker-based radiostereometry POULSEN, Magnus STØDLE, Are H NORDSLETTEN, Lars RÖHRL, Stephan M Acta Orthop Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: 3-dimensional midfoot motion is hard to evaluate in clinical practice. We present a new computed tomography (CT)-based radiostereometric analysis (CT-RSA) technique to examine in vivo midfoot kinematics during single-leg stance and compare it with marker-based radiostereometry (RSA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 8 patients were examined with bilateral non- and full-weight-bearing CT images of the midfoot. 1st tarsometatarsal motion was analyzed using a surface-registration technique (CT-RSA). As all patients had unilateral tantalum markers in the 1st cuneiform (C1) and 1st metatarsal (M1), comparison of precision with markerbased RSA was performed. CT-RSA precision was evaluated with surface registration of both C1–M1 bone and C1–M1 tantalum markers, while RSA precision was determined with C1–M1 markers only. Additionally, to remove motion bias, we evaluated intrasegmental CT-RSA precision by comparing proximal with distal part of M1. RESULTS: Under physical load, the primary movement for the 1st tarsometatarsal joint was M1 dorsiflexion (mean 1.4°), adduction (mean 1.4°), and dorsal translation (mean 1.1 mm). CT-RSA precision, using surface bone or markers, was in the range of 0.3–0.7 mm for translation and 0.6–1.6° for rotation. In comparison, RSA precision was in the range of 0.4–0.9 mm for translation and 1.0–1.7° for rotation. Finally, intrasegmental CT-RSA precision was in the range of 0.1–0.2 mm for translation and 0.4–0.5° for rotation. CONCLUSION: CT-RSA is a valid and precise, non-invasive method to measure midfoot kinematics when compared with conventional RSA. Medical Journals Sweden, on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation 2023-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10370411/ /pubmed/37493528 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.16905 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
spellingShingle Article
POULSEN, Magnus
STØDLE, Are H
NORDSLETTEN, Lars
RÖHRL, Stephan M
CT-based radiostereometric analysis for assessing midfoot kinematics: precision compared with marker-based radiostereometry
title CT-based radiostereometric analysis for assessing midfoot kinematics: precision compared with marker-based radiostereometry
title_full CT-based radiostereometric analysis for assessing midfoot kinematics: precision compared with marker-based radiostereometry
title_fullStr CT-based radiostereometric analysis for assessing midfoot kinematics: precision compared with marker-based radiostereometry
title_full_unstemmed CT-based radiostereometric analysis for assessing midfoot kinematics: precision compared with marker-based radiostereometry
title_short CT-based radiostereometric analysis for assessing midfoot kinematics: precision compared with marker-based radiostereometry
title_sort ct-based radiostereometric analysis for assessing midfoot kinematics: precision compared with marker-based radiostereometry
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10370411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37493528
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.16905
work_keys_str_mv AT poulsenmagnus ctbasedradiostereometricanalysisforassessingmidfootkinematicsprecisioncomparedwithmarkerbasedradiostereometry
AT stødleareh ctbasedradiostereometricanalysisforassessingmidfootkinematicsprecisioncomparedwithmarkerbasedradiostereometry
AT nordslettenlars ctbasedradiostereometricanalysisforassessingmidfootkinematicsprecisioncomparedwithmarkerbasedradiostereometry
AT rohrlstephanm ctbasedradiostereometricanalysisforassessingmidfootkinematicsprecisioncomparedwithmarkerbasedradiostereometry