Cargando…
Integrating scRNA and bulk-RNA sequencing develops a cell senescence signature for analyzing tumor heterogeneity in clear cell renal cell carcinoma
INTRODUCTION: Cellular senescence (CS) plays a critical role in cancer development, including clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Traditional RNA sequencing cannot detect precise molecular composition changes within tumors. This study aimed to analyze cellular senescence’s biochemical character...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10370498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37503331 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1199002 |
Sumario: | INTRODUCTION: Cellular senescence (CS) plays a critical role in cancer development, including clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Traditional RNA sequencing cannot detect precise molecular composition changes within tumors. This study aimed to analyze cellular senescence’s biochemical characteristics in ccRCC using single RNA sequencing (ScRNA-seq) and traditional RNA sequencing (Bulk RNA-seq). METHODS: Researchers analyzed the biochemical characteristics of cellular senescence in ccRCC using ScRNA-seq and Bulk RNA-seq. They combined these approaches to identify differences between malignant and non-malignant phenotypes in ccRCC across three senescence-related pathways. Genes from these pathways were used to identify molecular subtypes associated with senescence, and a new risk model was constructed. The function of the gene DUSP1 in ccRCC was validated through biological experiments. RESULTS: The combined analysis of ScRNA-seq and Bulk RNA-seq revealed significant differences between malignant and non-malignant phenotypes in ccRCC across three senescence-related pathways. Researchers identified genes from these pathways to identify molecular subtypes associated with senescence, constructing a new risk model. Different subgroups showed significant differences in prognosis level, clinical stage and grade, immune infiltration, immunotherapy, and drug sensitivity. DISCUSSION: Senescence signature markers are practical biomarkers and predictors of molecular typing in ccRCC. Differences in prognosis level, clinical stage and grade, immune infiltration, immunotherapy, and drug sensitivity between different subgroups indicate that this approach could provide valuable insights into senescence-related treatment options and prognostic assessment for patients with ccRCC. The function of the gene DUSP1 in ccRCC was validated through biological experiments, confirming its feasibility as a novel biomarker for ccRCC. These findings suggest that targeted therapies based on senescence-related mechanisms could be an effective treatment option for ccRCC. |
---|