Cargando…

Intraprocedural Plaque Protrusion during Carotid Artery Stenting with a CASPER Stent: A Case Report

OBJECTIVE: Plaque protrusion (PP) during carotid artery stenting (CAS) is considered to be associated with periprocedural ischemic stroke. A new double-layer micromesh stent, the CASPER stent (CS), was approved for use in Japan in 2020. The expectation is that this micromesh stent system will reduce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wada, Takeshi, Takayama, Katsutoshi, Myouchin, Kaoru, Oshima, Keisuke, Tanaka, Toshihiro, Kichikawa, Kimihiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10370511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37501884
http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.cr.2022-0054
_version_ 1785077948856926208
author Wada, Takeshi
Takayama, Katsutoshi
Myouchin, Kaoru
Oshima, Keisuke
Tanaka, Toshihiro
Kichikawa, Kimihiko
author_facet Wada, Takeshi
Takayama, Katsutoshi
Myouchin, Kaoru
Oshima, Keisuke
Tanaka, Toshihiro
Kichikawa, Kimihiko
author_sort Wada, Takeshi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Plaque protrusion (PP) during carotid artery stenting (CAS) is considered to be associated with periprocedural ischemic stroke. A new double-layer micromesh stent, the CASPER stent (CS), was approved for use in Japan in 2020. The expectation is that this micromesh stent system will reduce the risk of PP, but we report a case of PP during CAS despite the use of a CS. CASE PRESENTATION: An 87-year-old man presented with left hemiparesis. MRI showed right brain infarction and angiography showed right internal carotid artery stenosis with thrombus. Follow-up angiography after medical treatment showed that thrombus disappeared. We therefore performed CAS for right internal carotid artery stenosis with unstable plaque. CAS was performed under local anesthesia with Mo.Ma Ultra and FilterWire EZ protection using a CS placed to sufficiently cover the stenotic region. Conservative post-dilatation was then performed. Intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) after post-dilatation showed the presence of PP. A second CS was then added using the stent-in-stent technique. No postoperative neurological abnormalities were found and the patient was discharged without postoperative complications. No stroke or restenosis has been observed as of 16 months after CAS. CONCLUSION: PP can occur even when CAS is performed using the CS for carotid artery stenosis with unstable plaque. The importance of checking for PP using IVUS is suggested.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10370511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103705112023-07-27 Intraprocedural Plaque Protrusion during Carotid Artery Stenting with a CASPER Stent: A Case Report Wada, Takeshi Takayama, Katsutoshi Myouchin, Kaoru Oshima, Keisuke Tanaka, Toshihiro Kichikawa, Kimihiko J Neuroendovasc Ther Case Report OBJECTIVE: Plaque protrusion (PP) during carotid artery stenting (CAS) is considered to be associated with periprocedural ischemic stroke. A new double-layer micromesh stent, the CASPER stent (CS), was approved for use in Japan in 2020. The expectation is that this micromesh stent system will reduce the risk of PP, but we report a case of PP during CAS despite the use of a CS. CASE PRESENTATION: An 87-year-old man presented with left hemiparesis. MRI showed right brain infarction and angiography showed right internal carotid artery stenosis with thrombus. Follow-up angiography after medical treatment showed that thrombus disappeared. We therefore performed CAS for right internal carotid artery stenosis with unstable plaque. CAS was performed under local anesthesia with Mo.Ma Ultra and FilterWire EZ protection using a CS placed to sufficiently cover the stenotic region. Conservative post-dilatation was then performed. Intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) after post-dilatation showed the presence of PP. A second CS was then added using the stent-in-stent technique. No postoperative neurological abnormalities were found and the patient was discharged without postoperative complications. No stroke or restenosis has been observed as of 16 months after CAS. CONCLUSION: PP can occur even when CAS is performed using the CS for carotid artery stenosis with unstable plaque. The importance of checking for PP using IVUS is suggested. The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy 2022-11-30 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10370511/ /pubmed/37501884 http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.cr.2022-0054 Text en ©2023 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Case Report
Wada, Takeshi
Takayama, Katsutoshi
Myouchin, Kaoru
Oshima, Keisuke
Tanaka, Toshihiro
Kichikawa, Kimihiko
Intraprocedural Plaque Protrusion during Carotid Artery Stenting with a CASPER Stent: A Case Report
title Intraprocedural Plaque Protrusion during Carotid Artery Stenting with a CASPER Stent: A Case Report
title_full Intraprocedural Plaque Protrusion during Carotid Artery Stenting with a CASPER Stent: A Case Report
title_fullStr Intraprocedural Plaque Protrusion during Carotid Artery Stenting with a CASPER Stent: A Case Report
title_full_unstemmed Intraprocedural Plaque Protrusion during Carotid Artery Stenting with a CASPER Stent: A Case Report
title_short Intraprocedural Plaque Protrusion during Carotid Artery Stenting with a CASPER Stent: A Case Report
title_sort intraprocedural plaque protrusion during carotid artery stenting with a casper stent: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10370511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37501884
http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.cr.2022-0054
work_keys_str_mv AT wadatakeshi intraproceduralplaqueprotrusionduringcarotidarterystentingwithacasperstentacasereport
AT takayamakatsutoshi intraproceduralplaqueprotrusionduringcarotidarterystentingwithacasperstentacasereport
AT myouchinkaoru intraproceduralplaqueprotrusionduringcarotidarterystentingwithacasperstentacasereport
AT oshimakeisuke intraproceduralplaqueprotrusionduringcarotidarterystentingwithacasperstentacasereport
AT tanakatoshihiro intraproceduralplaqueprotrusionduringcarotidarterystentingwithacasperstentacasereport
AT kichikawakimihiko intraproceduralplaqueprotrusionduringcarotidarterystentingwithacasperstentacasereport