Cargando…

Periprocedural Variability of Platelet Functions in Carotid Artery Stenting: An Analysis Using VerifyNow

OBJECTIVE: The assessment of platelet functions is necessary to prevent both thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications under dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Using the VerifyNow (Accumetrics, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) assay, this study aimed to reveal time-dependent changes in platelet functions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoshimura, Masataka, Sumita, Kazutaka, Fujii, Shoko, Miki, Kazunori, Aizawa, Yuki, Fujita, Kyohei, Yamamoto, Shinji, Nemoto, Shigeru, Maehara, Taketoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10370580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502767
http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2020-0170
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The assessment of platelet functions is necessary to prevent both thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications under dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Using the VerifyNow (Accumetrics, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) assay, this study aimed to reveal time-dependent changes in platelet functions after carotid artery stenting (CAS). METHODS: We enrolled retrospectively 43 patients who underwent CAS under DAPT. Aspirin reaction unit (ARU) and P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) values were determined on the day before and on days 1, 3, and 7 after the procedure. Multiple comparison tests (MCTs) were performed among ARU and PRU measurement points, and the proportions of hypo- and hyper-responses were compared. RESULTS: The median ARU values were 408 (interquartile range: 392–497) before CAS and 418 (405–470) on day 1, 405 (393.0–460.5) on day 3, and 402 (388.5–477.5) on day 7 (not significant in MCTs). The percentages of hypo-responses were 16.3%, 7.0%, 2.3%, and 7.0%, respectively (p = 0.11). The significantly different median PRU values were 173 (116.5–209.5), 233 (166.5–273.5), 139 (70.5–205.5), and 51 (9.0–79.5), respectively. The median PRU was before the procedure within the therapeutic range but exceeded the upper cutoff on day 1 and was below the lower cutoff on day 7. The percentages of hypo-responses were 14.0%, 51.2%, 18.6%, and 11.6%, respectively (p <0.001) and the percentages of hyper-responses were 9.3%, 2.3%, 23.3%, and 62.8%, respectively (p <0.001). CONCLUSION: In the periprocedural CAS period, ARU values were stable, but PRU values showed time-dependent changes. PRU values were above the therapeutic range the day after CAS but decreased below this range on day 7.