Cargando…
The Usefulness of Prasugrel as Rescue Medication in Neuroendovascular Therapy
OBJECTIVE: In neuroendovascular therapy, clopidogrel resistance and thrombosis are common problems. In such cases, we use prasugrel as rescue medication, and we clarified its usefulness. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 199 consecutive cases of neuroendovascular therapy performed at our hosp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10370648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502391 http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2019-0097 |
_version_ | 1785077980570058752 |
---|---|
author | Niimi, Jun Takahashi, Yurika Ueda, Kotaro Tasaka, Kenta Tsuruoka, Atsushi Nemoto, Fumio Moriwaki, Takuya Hatayama, Kazumi Otake, Mitsuhiro Naito, Hiromichi |
author_facet | Niimi, Jun Takahashi, Yurika Ueda, Kotaro Tasaka, Kenta Tsuruoka, Atsushi Nemoto, Fumio Moriwaki, Takuya Hatayama, Kazumi Otake, Mitsuhiro Naito, Hiromichi |
author_sort | Niimi, Jun |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: In neuroendovascular therapy, clopidogrel resistance and thrombosis are common problems. In such cases, we use prasugrel as rescue medication, and we clarified its usefulness. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 199 consecutive cases of neuroendovascular therapy performed at our hospital from April 2016 to March 2018, and examined the safety and effectiveness of prasugrel. RESULTS: There were 14 cases of prasugrel administration: six cases of coil embolization for cerebral aneurysm, five cases of carotid artery stenting (CAS), and three other cases. The reasons for prasugrel administration were as follows: emergency stent use in four cases, intraoperative thrombosis in three cases, intra-stent thrombosis after CAS in three cases, and others in four cases. In all cases, it was used in combination with aspirin and the median duration of administration was 212 days. Regarding its safety, there was one hemorrhagic complication at the puncture site for which the involvement of prasugrel was unable to be excluded, but it was improved by conservative treatment and there was no major hemorrhage such as intracranial hemorrhage. Regarding its efficacy, in one case, the thrombus during coil embolization did not completely disappear after prasugrel administration and additional mechanical thrombolysis was required. However, no new thrombosis was observed during prasugrel administration in all 14 cases. CONCLUSION: Prasugrel may be useful as a rescue medication in neuroendovascular therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10370648 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103706482023-07-27 The Usefulness of Prasugrel as Rescue Medication in Neuroendovascular Therapy Niimi, Jun Takahashi, Yurika Ueda, Kotaro Tasaka, Kenta Tsuruoka, Atsushi Nemoto, Fumio Moriwaki, Takuya Hatayama, Kazumi Otake, Mitsuhiro Naito, Hiromichi J Neuroendovasc Ther Original Article OBJECTIVE: In neuroendovascular therapy, clopidogrel resistance and thrombosis are common problems. In such cases, we use prasugrel as rescue medication, and we clarified its usefulness. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 199 consecutive cases of neuroendovascular therapy performed at our hospital from April 2016 to March 2018, and examined the safety and effectiveness of prasugrel. RESULTS: There were 14 cases of prasugrel administration: six cases of coil embolization for cerebral aneurysm, five cases of carotid artery stenting (CAS), and three other cases. The reasons for prasugrel administration were as follows: emergency stent use in four cases, intraoperative thrombosis in three cases, intra-stent thrombosis after CAS in three cases, and others in four cases. In all cases, it was used in combination with aspirin and the median duration of administration was 212 days. Regarding its safety, there was one hemorrhagic complication at the puncture site for which the involvement of prasugrel was unable to be excluded, but it was improved by conservative treatment and there was no major hemorrhage such as intracranial hemorrhage. Regarding its efficacy, in one case, the thrombus during coil embolization did not completely disappear after prasugrel administration and additional mechanical thrombolysis was required. However, no new thrombosis was observed during prasugrel administration in all 14 cases. CONCLUSION: Prasugrel may be useful as a rescue medication in neuroendovascular therapy. The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy 2020-02-12 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC10370648/ /pubmed/37502391 http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2019-0097 Text en ©2020 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Article Niimi, Jun Takahashi, Yurika Ueda, Kotaro Tasaka, Kenta Tsuruoka, Atsushi Nemoto, Fumio Moriwaki, Takuya Hatayama, Kazumi Otake, Mitsuhiro Naito, Hiromichi The Usefulness of Prasugrel as Rescue Medication in Neuroendovascular Therapy |
title | The Usefulness of Prasugrel as Rescue Medication in Neuroendovascular Therapy |
title_full | The Usefulness of Prasugrel as Rescue Medication in Neuroendovascular Therapy |
title_fullStr | The Usefulness of Prasugrel as Rescue Medication in Neuroendovascular Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | The Usefulness of Prasugrel as Rescue Medication in Neuroendovascular Therapy |
title_short | The Usefulness of Prasugrel as Rescue Medication in Neuroendovascular Therapy |
title_sort | usefulness of prasugrel as rescue medication in neuroendovascular therapy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10370648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502391 http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2019-0097 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT niimijun theusefulnessofprasugrelasrescuemedicationinneuroendovasculartherapy AT takahashiyurika theusefulnessofprasugrelasrescuemedicationinneuroendovasculartherapy AT uedakotaro theusefulnessofprasugrelasrescuemedicationinneuroendovasculartherapy AT tasakakenta theusefulnessofprasugrelasrescuemedicationinneuroendovasculartherapy AT tsuruokaatsushi theusefulnessofprasugrelasrescuemedicationinneuroendovasculartherapy AT nemotofumio theusefulnessofprasugrelasrescuemedicationinneuroendovasculartherapy AT moriwakitakuya theusefulnessofprasugrelasrescuemedicationinneuroendovasculartherapy AT hatayamakazumi theusefulnessofprasugrelasrescuemedicationinneuroendovasculartherapy AT otakemitsuhiro theusefulnessofprasugrelasrescuemedicationinneuroendovasculartherapy AT naitohiromichi theusefulnessofprasugrelasrescuemedicationinneuroendovasculartherapy AT niimijun usefulnessofprasugrelasrescuemedicationinneuroendovasculartherapy AT takahashiyurika usefulnessofprasugrelasrescuemedicationinneuroendovasculartherapy AT uedakotaro usefulnessofprasugrelasrescuemedicationinneuroendovasculartherapy AT tasakakenta usefulnessofprasugrelasrescuemedicationinneuroendovasculartherapy AT tsuruokaatsushi usefulnessofprasugrelasrescuemedicationinneuroendovasculartherapy AT nemotofumio usefulnessofprasugrelasrescuemedicationinneuroendovasculartherapy AT moriwakitakuya usefulnessofprasugrelasrescuemedicationinneuroendovasculartherapy AT hatayamakazumi usefulnessofprasugrelasrescuemedicationinneuroendovasculartherapy AT otakemitsuhiro usefulnessofprasugrelasrescuemedicationinneuroendovasculartherapy AT naitohiromichi usefulnessofprasugrelasrescuemedicationinneuroendovasculartherapy |