Cargando…
The Inventory of Nonordinary Experiences (INOE): Evidence of validity in the United States and India
Researchers increasingly recognize that the mind and culture interact at many levels to constitute our lived experience, yet we know relatively little about the extent to which culture shapes the way people appraise their experiences and the likelihood that a given experience will be reported. Exper...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10370766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37494339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287780 |
_version_ | 1785078006253879296 |
---|---|
author | Taves, Ann Ihm, Elliott Wolf, Melissa Barlev, Michael Kinsella, Michael Vyas, Maharshi |
author_facet | Taves, Ann Ihm, Elliott Wolf, Melissa Barlev, Michael Kinsella, Michael Vyas, Maharshi |
author_sort | Taves, Ann |
collection | PubMed |
description | Researchers increasingly recognize that the mind and culture interact at many levels to constitute our lived experience, yet we know relatively little about the extent to which culture shapes the way people appraise their experiences and the likelihood that a given experience will be reported. Experiences that involve claims regarding deities, extraordinary abilities, and/or psychopathology offer an important site for investigating the interplay of mind and culture at the population level. However, the difficulties inherent in comparing culture-laden experiences, exacerbated by the siloing of research on experiences based on discipline-specific theoretical constructs, have limited our ability to do so. We introduce the Inventory of Nonordinary Experiences (INOE), which allows researchers to compare experiences by separating the phenomenological features from how they are appraised and asking about both. It thereby offers a new means of investigating the potentially universal (etic) and culture-specific (emic) aspects of lived experiences. To ensure that the INOE survey items are understood as intended by English speakers in the US and Hindi speakers in India, and thus can serve as a basis for cross-cultural comparison, we used the Response Process Evaluation (RPE) method to collect evidence of item-level validity. Our inability to validate some items drawn from other surveys suggests that they are capturing a wider range of experiences than researchers intend. Wider use of the RPE method would increase the likelihood that survey results are due to the differences that researchers intend to measure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10370766 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103707662023-07-27 The Inventory of Nonordinary Experiences (INOE): Evidence of validity in the United States and India Taves, Ann Ihm, Elliott Wolf, Melissa Barlev, Michael Kinsella, Michael Vyas, Maharshi PLoS One Research Article Researchers increasingly recognize that the mind and culture interact at many levels to constitute our lived experience, yet we know relatively little about the extent to which culture shapes the way people appraise their experiences and the likelihood that a given experience will be reported. Experiences that involve claims regarding deities, extraordinary abilities, and/or psychopathology offer an important site for investigating the interplay of mind and culture at the population level. However, the difficulties inherent in comparing culture-laden experiences, exacerbated by the siloing of research on experiences based on discipline-specific theoretical constructs, have limited our ability to do so. We introduce the Inventory of Nonordinary Experiences (INOE), which allows researchers to compare experiences by separating the phenomenological features from how they are appraised and asking about both. It thereby offers a new means of investigating the potentially universal (etic) and culture-specific (emic) aspects of lived experiences. To ensure that the INOE survey items are understood as intended by English speakers in the US and Hindi speakers in India, and thus can serve as a basis for cross-cultural comparison, we used the Response Process Evaluation (RPE) method to collect evidence of item-level validity. Our inability to validate some items drawn from other surveys suggests that they are capturing a wider range of experiences than researchers intend. Wider use of the RPE method would increase the likelihood that survey results are due to the differences that researchers intend to measure. Public Library of Science 2023-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10370766/ /pubmed/37494339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287780 Text en © 2023 Taves et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Taves, Ann Ihm, Elliott Wolf, Melissa Barlev, Michael Kinsella, Michael Vyas, Maharshi The Inventory of Nonordinary Experiences (INOE): Evidence of validity in the United States and India |
title | The Inventory of Nonordinary Experiences (INOE): Evidence of validity in the United States and India |
title_full | The Inventory of Nonordinary Experiences (INOE): Evidence of validity in the United States and India |
title_fullStr | The Inventory of Nonordinary Experiences (INOE): Evidence of validity in the United States and India |
title_full_unstemmed | The Inventory of Nonordinary Experiences (INOE): Evidence of validity in the United States and India |
title_short | The Inventory of Nonordinary Experiences (INOE): Evidence of validity in the United States and India |
title_sort | inventory of nonordinary experiences (inoe): evidence of validity in the united states and india |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10370766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37494339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287780 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tavesann theinventoryofnonordinaryexperiencesinoeevidenceofvalidityintheunitedstatesandindia AT ihmelliott theinventoryofnonordinaryexperiencesinoeevidenceofvalidityintheunitedstatesandindia AT wolfmelissa theinventoryofnonordinaryexperiencesinoeevidenceofvalidityintheunitedstatesandindia AT barlevmichael theinventoryofnonordinaryexperiencesinoeevidenceofvalidityintheunitedstatesandindia AT kinsellamichael theinventoryofnonordinaryexperiencesinoeevidenceofvalidityintheunitedstatesandindia AT vyasmaharshi theinventoryofnonordinaryexperiencesinoeevidenceofvalidityintheunitedstatesandindia AT tavesann inventoryofnonordinaryexperiencesinoeevidenceofvalidityintheunitedstatesandindia AT ihmelliott inventoryofnonordinaryexperiencesinoeevidenceofvalidityintheunitedstatesandindia AT wolfmelissa inventoryofnonordinaryexperiencesinoeevidenceofvalidityintheunitedstatesandindia AT barlevmichael inventoryofnonordinaryexperiencesinoeevidenceofvalidityintheunitedstatesandindia AT kinsellamichael inventoryofnonordinaryexperiencesinoeevidenceofvalidityintheunitedstatesandindia AT vyasmaharshi inventoryofnonordinaryexperiencesinoeevidenceofvalidityintheunitedstatesandindia |