Cargando…

Evaluation of Peak Skin Doses and Lens Doses during Interventional Neuroradiology Using a Direct Measurement System

OBJECTIVE: In interventional neuroradiology (INR), the evaluation of the peak skin dose (PSD) and lens dose is important because the patient radiation dose increases in cases in which the procedure is more difficult and complex. This study evaluated the radiation doses during INR procedures using a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kawauchi, Satoru, Chida, Koichi, Moritake, Takashi, Hamada, Yusuke, Yoda, Shogo, Sakuma, Hideyuki, Tsuruta, Wataro, Matsumaru, Yuji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10370819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502201
http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2022-0024
_version_ 1785078019082158080
author Kawauchi, Satoru
Chida, Koichi
Moritake, Takashi
Hamada, Yusuke
Yoda, Shogo
Sakuma, Hideyuki
Tsuruta, Wataro
Matsumaru, Yuji
author_facet Kawauchi, Satoru
Chida, Koichi
Moritake, Takashi
Hamada, Yusuke
Yoda, Shogo
Sakuma, Hideyuki
Tsuruta, Wataro
Matsumaru, Yuji
author_sort Kawauchi, Satoru
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: In interventional neuroradiology (INR), the evaluation of the peak skin dose (PSD) and lens dose is important because the patient radiation dose increases in cases in which the procedure is more difficult and complex. This study evaluated the radiation doses during INR procedures using a direct measurement system. METHODS: Radiation dose measurements during INR were performed in 332 patients with unruptured aneurysm (URAN), dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF), and arteriovenous malformation (AVM). The PSD and bilateral lens doses were analyzed for each disease. The Pearson correlation test was used to determine whether the PSD and lens doses were linearly related to the reference air kerma (K(a,r)). RESULTS: In all cases, the PSD and right and left lens doses were 2.36 ± 1.28 Gy, 114.2 ± 54.6 mGy, and 189.8 ± 160.3 mGy, respectively. The PSD and lens doses of the DAVF and AVM cases were significantly higher than those of the URAN case. The Pearson correlation test revealed statistically significant positive correlations between K(a,r) and PSD, K(a,r) and right lens dose, and K(a,r) and left lens dose. CONCLUSION: The characteristics of radiation dose in INR were clarified. Owing to the concern of increased radiation doses exceeding the threshold values in DAVF and AVM cases, protection from radiation is required. Simple regression analysis revealed the possibility of precisely predicting PSD using K(a,r).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10370819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103708192023-07-27 Evaluation of Peak Skin Doses and Lens Doses during Interventional Neuroradiology Using a Direct Measurement System Kawauchi, Satoru Chida, Koichi Moritake, Takashi Hamada, Yusuke Yoda, Shogo Sakuma, Hideyuki Tsuruta, Wataro Matsumaru, Yuji J Neuroendovasc Ther Original Article OBJECTIVE: In interventional neuroradiology (INR), the evaluation of the peak skin dose (PSD) and lens dose is important because the patient radiation dose increases in cases in which the procedure is more difficult and complex. This study evaluated the radiation doses during INR procedures using a direct measurement system. METHODS: Radiation dose measurements during INR were performed in 332 patients with unruptured aneurysm (URAN), dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF), and arteriovenous malformation (AVM). The PSD and bilateral lens doses were analyzed for each disease. The Pearson correlation test was used to determine whether the PSD and lens doses were linearly related to the reference air kerma (K(a,r)). RESULTS: In all cases, the PSD and right and left lens doses were 2.36 ± 1.28 Gy, 114.2 ± 54.6 mGy, and 189.8 ± 160.3 mGy, respectively. The PSD and lens doses of the DAVF and AVM cases were significantly higher than those of the URAN case. The Pearson correlation test revealed statistically significant positive correlations between K(a,r) and PSD, K(a,r) and right lens dose, and K(a,r) and left lens dose. CONCLUSION: The characteristics of radiation dose in INR were clarified. Owing to the concern of increased radiation doses exceeding the threshold values in DAVF and AVM cases, protection from radiation is required. Simple regression analysis revealed the possibility of precisely predicting PSD using K(a,r). The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy 2022-07-14 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC10370819/ /pubmed/37502201 http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2022-0024 Text en ©2022 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Kawauchi, Satoru
Chida, Koichi
Moritake, Takashi
Hamada, Yusuke
Yoda, Shogo
Sakuma, Hideyuki
Tsuruta, Wataro
Matsumaru, Yuji
Evaluation of Peak Skin Doses and Lens Doses during Interventional Neuroradiology Using a Direct Measurement System
title Evaluation of Peak Skin Doses and Lens Doses during Interventional Neuroradiology Using a Direct Measurement System
title_full Evaluation of Peak Skin Doses and Lens Doses during Interventional Neuroradiology Using a Direct Measurement System
title_fullStr Evaluation of Peak Skin Doses and Lens Doses during Interventional Neuroradiology Using a Direct Measurement System
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Peak Skin Doses and Lens Doses during Interventional Neuroradiology Using a Direct Measurement System
title_short Evaluation of Peak Skin Doses and Lens Doses during Interventional Neuroradiology Using a Direct Measurement System
title_sort evaluation of peak skin doses and lens doses during interventional neuroradiology using a direct measurement system
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10370819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502201
http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2022-0024
work_keys_str_mv AT kawauchisatoru evaluationofpeakskindosesandlensdosesduringinterventionalneuroradiologyusingadirectmeasurementsystem
AT chidakoichi evaluationofpeakskindosesandlensdosesduringinterventionalneuroradiologyusingadirectmeasurementsystem
AT moritaketakashi evaluationofpeakskindosesandlensdosesduringinterventionalneuroradiologyusingadirectmeasurementsystem
AT hamadayusuke evaluationofpeakskindosesandlensdosesduringinterventionalneuroradiologyusingadirectmeasurementsystem
AT yodashogo evaluationofpeakskindosesandlensdosesduringinterventionalneuroradiologyusingadirectmeasurementsystem
AT sakumahideyuki evaluationofpeakskindosesandlensdosesduringinterventionalneuroradiologyusingadirectmeasurementsystem
AT tsurutawataro evaluationofpeakskindosesandlensdosesduringinterventionalneuroradiologyusingadirectmeasurementsystem
AT matsumaruyuji evaluationofpeakskindosesandlensdosesduringinterventionalneuroradiologyusingadirectmeasurementsystem