Cargando…

Validity about Diameter of Guiding Catheter for Posterior Circulation Derived by MRA Study

OBJECTIVE: The development of large-bore aspiration catheters (ACs) has advanced the treatment of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and their use requires larger guiding catheters (GCs). However, due to the small vessel diameter of the vertebral artery (VA), it can be difficult to cannulate large-bore GC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okuyama, Tsubasa, Kubota, Saori, Oishi, Hiromichi, Ishige, Satoshi, Machida, Toshio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10370875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37501737
http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2022-0030
_version_ 1785078031838085120
author Okuyama, Tsubasa
Kubota, Saori
Oishi, Hiromichi
Ishige, Satoshi
Machida, Toshio
author_facet Okuyama, Tsubasa
Kubota, Saori
Oishi, Hiromichi
Ishige, Satoshi
Machida, Toshio
author_sort Okuyama, Tsubasa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The development of large-bore aspiration catheters (ACs) has advanced the treatment of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and their use requires larger guiding catheters (GCs). However, due to the small vessel diameter of the vertebral artery (VA), it can be difficult to cannulate large-bore GC to the VA. This study aims to determine the percentage of VAs that are amenable to GC placement based on the use of a large-bore AC and to clarify the diameters of VAs in the general population using neck MRA. METHODS: Left and right VA diameters were measured in 1394 consecutive adult patients who underwent neck MRA at our hospital between April 2020 and June 2021. Sex and left/right differences in the VA diameters, as well as the conformity ratios of GCs (6, 7, and 8 French) to right and left VAs, were examined. RESULTS: The patients ranged in age from 18 to 98 years (mean 70.8 ± 13.5 years), with 770 (55.2%) males. The left and right VA mean diameters were 2.82 ± 0.75 mm (range 0–5.1 mm) and 2.65 ± 0.75 mm (range 0–5.3 mm), respectively. The conformity ratios of 6, 7, and 8 French GC to left and right VAs were 85.3% and 79.9%, 74.9% and 68.4%, and 60.9% and 53.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: When performing MT for the posterior circulation system, a large-bore AC of 0.060 inches or larger is usually required, and GC placement of 7-French or larger is necessary. The results of this study showed that 7-French GC placement is achievable in approximately 70% of these cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10370875
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103708752023-07-27 Validity about Diameter of Guiding Catheter for Posterior Circulation Derived by MRA Study Okuyama, Tsubasa Kubota, Saori Oishi, Hiromichi Ishige, Satoshi Machida, Toshio J Neuroendovasc Ther Original Article OBJECTIVE: The development of large-bore aspiration catheters (ACs) has advanced the treatment of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and their use requires larger guiding catheters (GCs). However, due to the small vessel diameter of the vertebral artery (VA), it can be difficult to cannulate large-bore GC to the VA. This study aims to determine the percentage of VAs that are amenable to GC placement based on the use of a large-bore AC and to clarify the diameters of VAs in the general population using neck MRA. METHODS: Left and right VA diameters were measured in 1394 consecutive adult patients who underwent neck MRA at our hospital between April 2020 and June 2021. Sex and left/right differences in the VA diameters, as well as the conformity ratios of GCs (6, 7, and 8 French) to right and left VAs, were examined. RESULTS: The patients ranged in age from 18 to 98 years (mean 70.8 ± 13.5 years), with 770 (55.2%) males. The left and right VA mean diameters were 2.82 ± 0.75 mm (range 0–5.1 mm) and 2.65 ± 0.75 mm (range 0–5.3 mm), respectively. The conformity ratios of 6, 7, and 8 French GC to left and right VAs were 85.3% and 79.9%, 74.9% and 68.4%, and 60.9% and 53.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: When performing MT for the posterior circulation system, a large-bore AC of 0.060 inches or larger is usually required, and GC placement of 7-French or larger is necessary. The results of this study showed that 7-French GC placement is achievable in approximately 70% of these cases. The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy 2022-08-19 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC10370875/ /pubmed/37501737 http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2022-0030 Text en ©2022 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Okuyama, Tsubasa
Kubota, Saori
Oishi, Hiromichi
Ishige, Satoshi
Machida, Toshio
Validity about Diameter of Guiding Catheter for Posterior Circulation Derived by MRA Study
title Validity about Diameter of Guiding Catheter for Posterior Circulation Derived by MRA Study
title_full Validity about Diameter of Guiding Catheter for Posterior Circulation Derived by MRA Study
title_fullStr Validity about Diameter of Guiding Catheter for Posterior Circulation Derived by MRA Study
title_full_unstemmed Validity about Diameter of Guiding Catheter for Posterior Circulation Derived by MRA Study
title_short Validity about Diameter of Guiding Catheter for Posterior Circulation Derived by MRA Study
title_sort validity about diameter of guiding catheter for posterior circulation derived by mra study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10370875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37501737
http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2022-0030
work_keys_str_mv AT okuyamatsubasa validityaboutdiameterofguidingcatheterforposteriorcirculationderivedbymrastudy
AT kubotasaori validityaboutdiameterofguidingcatheterforposteriorcirculationderivedbymrastudy
AT oishihiromichi validityaboutdiameterofguidingcatheterforposteriorcirculationderivedbymrastudy
AT ishigesatoshi validityaboutdiameterofguidingcatheterforposteriorcirculationderivedbymrastudy
AT machidatoshio validityaboutdiameterofguidingcatheterforposteriorcirculationderivedbymrastudy