Cargando…

Endovascular Treatment for Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: Single-Center Experience and Review of Literatures

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of endovascular treatment for middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms remains controversial. However, recent studies have reported the safety of endovascular treatment for MCA aneurysms. In this study, we studied the efficacy and clinical outcomes of endovascular treatment for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kijima, Noriyuki, Miura, Shimpei, Terada, Eisaku, Nakagawa, Ryota, Tachi, Tetsuro, Murakami, Koki, Okita, Yoshiko, Kanemura, Yonehiro, Nakajima, Shin, Fujinaka, Toshiyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10370921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37501692
http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2019-0051
_version_ 1785078041316163584
author Kijima, Noriyuki
Miura, Shimpei
Terada, Eisaku
Nakagawa, Ryota
Tachi, Tetsuro
Murakami, Koki
Okita, Yoshiko
Kanemura, Yonehiro
Nakajima, Shin
Fujinaka, Toshiyuki
author_facet Kijima, Noriyuki
Miura, Shimpei
Terada, Eisaku
Nakagawa, Ryota
Tachi, Tetsuro
Murakami, Koki
Okita, Yoshiko
Kanemura, Yonehiro
Nakajima, Shin
Fujinaka, Toshiyuki
author_sort Kijima, Noriyuki
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of endovascular treatment for middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms remains controversial. However, recent studies have reported the safety of endovascular treatment for MCA aneurysms. In this study, we studied the efficacy and clinical outcomes of endovascular treatment for MCA aneurysms in our hospital and the morphology and anatomy of MCA aneurysms that were suitable for endovascular treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 26 cases of MCA aneurysms which had undergone endovascular treatment at our institution between January 2015 and October 2018. We studied sizes and shapes of the aneurysms, clinical and angiographical outcomes one year after the treatment, and complications in these 26 patients. We also compared the differences in these parameters of the 26 patients with those of 61 other patients who were treated with clipping during the same period. RESULTS: The median aneurysm size was 6.1 mm (1.8–29.9 mm), with the shapes of the aneurysms irregular in 8, and round in the other 18 cases. Four cases (15.4%) had ruptured aneurysms. All aneurysms were treated with assist techniques; 8 (30.8%) were treated by stent-assisted technique and 18 (69.2%) were treated by balloon-assisted technique and endovascular treatment was successfully performed in all (100%) cases. While the aneurysms were completely obliterated in 22 of them (84.6%), the remaining 4 cases (15.4%) had neck remnants. We observed periprocedural complications in 5 of the 26 (19.2%) aneurysms, all of which were transient and completely recovered during the follow-up period. The efficacy and complication rates were not different from the MCA aneurysms treated with clipping. All MCA aneurysms arising from the M1 trunk were treated with endovascular treatment, and those with a round shape with the axis not deviating from M1 were also treated with endovascular treatment. CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment for MCA aneurysms is safe and effective together with adjunctive techniques such as balloon-assisted technique or stent-assisted technique. Thus, M1 trunk aneurysms and MCA bifurcation aneurysms with a round shape along the same axis of MCA may be good indications for endovascular treatment. However, long-term clinical and angiographical outcomes remain unknown. Thus, further studies are needed to address the existing limitations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10370921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103709212023-07-27 Endovascular Treatment for Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: Single-Center Experience and Review of Literatures Kijima, Noriyuki Miura, Shimpei Terada, Eisaku Nakagawa, Ryota Tachi, Tetsuro Murakami, Koki Okita, Yoshiko Kanemura, Yonehiro Nakajima, Shin Fujinaka, Toshiyuki J Neuroendovasc Ther Original Article OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of endovascular treatment for middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms remains controversial. However, recent studies have reported the safety of endovascular treatment for MCA aneurysms. In this study, we studied the efficacy and clinical outcomes of endovascular treatment for MCA aneurysms in our hospital and the morphology and anatomy of MCA aneurysms that were suitable for endovascular treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 26 cases of MCA aneurysms which had undergone endovascular treatment at our institution between January 2015 and October 2018. We studied sizes and shapes of the aneurysms, clinical and angiographical outcomes one year after the treatment, and complications in these 26 patients. We also compared the differences in these parameters of the 26 patients with those of 61 other patients who were treated with clipping during the same period. RESULTS: The median aneurysm size was 6.1 mm (1.8–29.9 mm), with the shapes of the aneurysms irregular in 8, and round in the other 18 cases. Four cases (15.4%) had ruptured aneurysms. All aneurysms were treated with assist techniques; 8 (30.8%) were treated by stent-assisted technique and 18 (69.2%) were treated by balloon-assisted technique and endovascular treatment was successfully performed in all (100%) cases. While the aneurysms were completely obliterated in 22 of them (84.6%), the remaining 4 cases (15.4%) had neck remnants. We observed periprocedural complications in 5 of the 26 (19.2%) aneurysms, all of which were transient and completely recovered during the follow-up period. The efficacy and complication rates were not different from the MCA aneurysms treated with clipping. All MCA aneurysms arising from the M1 trunk were treated with endovascular treatment, and those with a round shape with the axis not deviating from M1 were also treated with endovascular treatment. CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment for MCA aneurysms is safe and effective together with adjunctive techniques such as balloon-assisted technique or stent-assisted technique. Thus, M1 trunk aneurysms and MCA bifurcation aneurysms with a round shape along the same axis of MCA may be good indications for endovascular treatment. However, long-term clinical and angiographical outcomes remain unknown. Thus, further studies are needed to address the existing limitations. The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy 2020-11-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC10370921/ /pubmed/37501692 http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2019-0051 Text en ©2021 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Kijima, Noriyuki
Miura, Shimpei
Terada, Eisaku
Nakagawa, Ryota
Tachi, Tetsuro
Murakami, Koki
Okita, Yoshiko
Kanemura, Yonehiro
Nakajima, Shin
Fujinaka, Toshiyuki
Endovascular Treatment for Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: Single-Center Experience and Review of Literatures
title Endovascular Treatment for Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: Single-Center Experience and Review of Literatures
title_full Endovascular Treatment for Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: Single-Center Experience and Review of Literatures
title_fullStr Endovascular Treatment for Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: Single-Center Experience and Review of Literatures
title_full_unstemmed Endovascular Treatment for Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: Single-Center Experience and Review of Literatures
title_short Endovascular Treatment for Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: Single-Center Experience and Review of Literatures
title_sort endovascular treatment for middle cerebral artery aneurysms: single-center experience and review of literatures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10370921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37501692
http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2019-0051
work_keys_str_mv AT kijimanoriyuki endovasculartreatmentformiddlecerebralarteryaneurysmssinglecenterexperienceandreviewofliteratures
AT miurashimpei endovasculartreatmentformiddlecerebralarteryaneurysmssinglecenterexperienceandreviewofliteratures
AT teradaeisaku endovasculartreatmentformiddlecerebralarteryaneurysmssinglecenterexperienceandreviewofliteratures
AT nakagawaryota endovasculartreatmentformiddlecerebralarteryaneurysmssinglecenterexperienceandreviewofliteratures
AT tachitetsuro endovasculartreatmentformiddlecerebralarteryaneurysmssinglecenterexperienceandreviewofliteratures
AT murakamikoki endovasculartreatmentformiddlecerebralarteryaneurysmssinglecenterexperienceandreviewofliteratures
AT okitayoshiko endovasculartreatmentformiddlecerebralarteryaneurysmssinglecenterexperienceandreviewofliteratures
AT kanemurayonehiro endovasculartreatmentformiddlecerebralarteryaneurysmssinglecenterexperienceandreviewofliteratures
AT nakajimashin endovasculartreatmentformiddlecerebralarteryaneurysmssinglecenterexperienceandreviewofliteratures
AT fujinakatoshiyuki endovasculartreatmentformiddlecerebralarteryaneurysmssinglecenterexperienceandreviewofliteratures