Cargando…

Evaluation of Contact Force between Aneurysm Model and Coil for Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms

OBJECTIVE: To ensure safe coil embolization for intracranial aneurysms, it is important to investigate the contact force between the coil and the aneurysm wall. However, it is unclear how the catheter tip position and the diameter of the secondary loop of the coil influence the contact force. In thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takashima, Kazuto, Ikeda, Yuta, Yoshinaka, Kiyoshi, Ohta, Makoto, Mori, Koji, Toma, Naoki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10370923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37501696
http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2020-0069
_version_ 1785078041777537024
author Takashima, Kazuto
Ikeda, Yuta
Yoshinaka, Kiyoshi
Ohta, Makoto
Mori, Koji
Toma, Naoki
author_facet Takashima, Kazuto
Ikeda, Yuta
Yoshinaka, Kiyoshi
Ohta, Makoto
Mori, Koji
Toma, Naoki
author_sort Takashima, Kazuto
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To ensure safe coil embolization for intracranial aneurysms, it is important to investigate the contact force between the coil and the aneurysm wall. However, it is unclear how the catheter tip position and the diameter of the secondary loop of the coil influence the contact force. In this study, we measured the contact force between a coil and an aneurysm biomodel under different conditions. METHODS: A commercially available coil was inserted through a microcatheter into a silicone rubber aneurysm model at a constant speed (1 mm/s) using an automatic stage, and the contact force between the coil and the aneurysm wall was measured by a force sensor attached on the aneurysm model. The inner diameter of the spherical aneurysm was 5 mm. The effects of varying the position of the catheter tip (near dome, center, near neck) and the diameter of the secondary coil (4.5 mm) were evaluated. RESULTS: When the catheter tip was inserted more deeply into the aneurysm (especially near the dome), the contact force increased. The contact force also increased as the secondary coil diameter was increased with the catheter tip near and in the center of the dome. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the catheter tip position and the secondary coil diameter affect the contact force. In particular, the contact force should be considered large with the catheter tip near the dome to ensure safe coil deployment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10370923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103709232023-07-27 Evaluation of Contact Force between Aneurysm Model and Coil for Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms Takashima, Kazuto Ikeda, Yuta Yoshinaka, Kiyoshi Ohta, Makoto Mori, Koji Toma, Naoki J Neuroendovasc Ther Original Article OBJECTIVE: To ensure safe coil embolization for intracranial aneurysms, it is important to investigate the contact force between the coil and the aneurysm wall. However, it is unclear how the catheter tip position and the diameter of the secondary loop of the coil influence the contact force. In this study, we measured the contact force between a coil and an aneurysm biomodel under different conditions. METHODS: A commercially available coil was inserted through a microcatheter into a silicone rubber aneurysm model at a constant speed (1 mm/s) using an automatic stage, and the contact force between the coil and the aneurysm wall was measured by a force sensor attached on the aneurysm model. The inner diameter of the spherical aneurysm was 5 mm. The effects of varying the position of the catheter tip (near dome, center, near neck) and the diameter of the secondary coil (4.5 mm) were evaluated. RESULTS: When the catheter tip was inserted more deeply into the aneurysm (especially near the dome), the contact force increased. The contact force also increased as the secondary coil diameter was increased with the catheter tip near and in the center of the dome. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the catheter tip position and the secondary coil diameter affect the contact force. In particular, the contact force should be considered large with the catheter tip near the dome to ensure safe coil deployment. The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy 2020-12-03 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC10370923/ /pubmed/37501696 http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2020-0069 Text en ©2021 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Takashima, Kazuto
Ikeda, Yuta
Yoshinaka, Kiyoshi
Ohta, Makoto
Mori, Koji
Toma, Naoki
Evaluation of Contact Force between Aneurysm Model and Coil for Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms
title Evaluation of Contact Force between Aneurysm Model and Coil for Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms
title_full Evaluation of Contact Force between Aneurysm Model and Coil for Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms
title_fullStr Evaluation of Contact Force between Aneurysm Model and Coil for Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Contact Force between Aneurysm Model and Coil for Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms
title_short Evaluation of Contact Force between Aneurysm Model and Coil for Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms
title_sort evaluation of contact force between aneurysm model and coil for embolization of intracranial aneurysms
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10370923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37501696
http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2020-0069
work_keys_str_mv AT takashimakazuto evaluationofcontactforcebetweenaneurysmmodelandcoilforembolizationofintracranialaneurysms
AT ikedayuta evaluationofcontactforcebetweenaneurysmmodelandcoilforembolizationofintracranialaneurysms
AT yoshinakakiyoshi evaluationofcontactforcebetweenaneurysmmodelandcoilforembolizationofintracranialaneurysms
AT ohtamakoto evaluationofcontactforcebetweenaneurysmmodelandcoilforembolizationofintracranialaneurysms
AT morikoji evaluationofcontactforcebetweenaneurysmmodelandcoilforembolizationofintracranialaneurysms
AT tomanaoki evaluationofcontactforcebetweenaneurysmmodelandcoilforembolizationofintracranialaneurysms