Cargando…
Evaluation of Contact Force between Aneurysm Model and Coil for Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms
OBJECTIVE: To ensure safe coil embolization for intracranial aneurysms, it is important to investigate the contact force between the coil and the aneurysm wall. However, it is unclear how the catheter tip position and the diameter of the secondary loop of the coil influence the contact force. In thi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10370923/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37501696 http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2020-0069 |
_version_ | 1785078041777537024 |
---|---|
author | Takashima, Kazuto Ikeda, Yuta Yoshinaka, Kiyoshi Ohta, Makoto Mori, Koji Toma, Naoki |
author_facet | Takashima, Kazuto Ikeda, Yuta Yoshinaka, Kiyoshi Ohta, Makoto Mori, Koji Toma, Naoki |
author_sort | Takashima, Kazuto |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To ensure safe coil embolization for intracranial aneurysms, it is important to investigate the contact force between the coil and the aneurysm wall. However, it is unclear how the catheter tip position and the diameter of the secondary loop of the coil influence the contact force. In this study, we measured the contact force between a coil and an aneurysm biomodel under different conditions. METHODS: A commercially available coil was inserted through a microcatheter into a silicone rubber aneurysm model at a constant speed (1 mm/s) using an automatic stage, and the contact force between the coil and the aneurysm wall was measured by a force sensor attached on the aneurysm model. The inner diameter of the spherical aneurysm was 5 mm. The effects of varying the position of the catheter tip (near dome, center, near neck) and the diameter of the secondary coil (4.5 mm) were evaluated. RESULTS: When the catheter tip was inserted more deeply into the aneurysm (especially near the dome), the contact force increased. The contact force also increased as the secondary coil diameter was increased with the catheter tip near and in the center of the dome. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the catheter tip position and the secondary coil diameter affect the contact force. In particular, the contact force should be considered large with the catheter tip near the dome to ensure safe coil deployment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10370923 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103709232023-07-27 Evaluation of Contact Force between Aneurysm Model and Coil for Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms Takashima, Kazuto Ikeda, Yuta Yoshinaka, Kiyoshi Ohta, Makoto Mori, Koji Toma, Naoki J Neuroendovasc Ther Original Article OBJECTIVE: To ensure safe coil embolization for intracranial aneurysms, it is important to investigate the contact force between the coil and the aneurysm wall. However, it is unclear how the catheter tip position and the diameter of the secondary loop of the coil influence the contact force. In this study, we measured the contact force between a coil and an aneurysm biomodel under different conditions. METHODS: A commercially available coil was inserted through a microcatheter into a silicone rubber aneurysm model at a constant speed (1 mm/s) using an automatic stage, and the contact force between the coil and the aneurysm wall was measured by a force sensor attached on the aneurysm model. The inner diameter of the spherical aneurysm was 5 mm. The effects of varying the position of the catheter tip (near dome, center, near neck) and the diameter of the secondary coil (4.5 mm) were evaluated. RESULTS: When the catheter tip was inserted more deeply into the aneurysm (especially near the dome), the contact force increased. The contact force also increased as the secondary coil diameter was increased with the catheter tip near and in the center of the dome. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the catheter tip position and the secondary coil diameter affect the contact force. In particular, the contact force should be considered large with the catheter tip near the dome to ensure safe coil deployment. The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy 2020-12-03 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC10370923/ /pubmed/37501696 http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2020-0069 Text en ©2021 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Article Takashima, Kazuto Ikeda, Yuta Yoshinaka, Kiyoshi Ohta, Makoto Mori, Koji Toma, Naoki Evaluation of Contact Force between Aneurysm Model and Coil for Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms |
title | Evaluation of Contact Force between Aneurysm Model and Coil for Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms |
title_full | Evaluation of Contact Force between Aneurysm Model and Coil for Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Contact Force between Aneurysm Model and Coil for Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Contact Force between Aneurysm Model and Coil for Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms |
title_short | Evaluation of Contact Force between Aneurysm Model and Coil for Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms |
title_sort | evaluation of contact force between aneurysm model and coil for embolization of intracranial aneurysms |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10370923/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37501696 http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2020-0069 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT takashimakazuto evaluationofcontactforcebetweenaneurysmmodelandcoilforembolizationofintracranialaneurysms AT ikedayuta evaluationofcontactforcebetweenaneurysmmodelandcoilforembolizationofintracranialaneurysms AT yoshinakakiyoshi evaluationofcontactforcebetweenaneurysmmodelandcoilforembolizationofintracranialaneurysms AT ohtamakoto evaluationofcontactforcebetweenaneurysmmodelandcoilforembolizationofintracranialaneurysms AT morikoji evaluationofcontactforcebetweenaneurysmmodelandcoilforembolizationofintracranialaneurysms AT tomanaoki evaluationofcontactforcebetweenaneurysmmodelandcoilforembolizationofintracranialaneurysms |