Cargando…
Results of Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients Aged ≥80 Years
OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) is controversial in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of MT in octogenarians. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-five patients who underwent MT for anteri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10370980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37501901 http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2020-0029 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) is controversial in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of MT in octogenarians. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-five patients who underwent MT for anterior circulation LVO between May 2014 and August 2019 at our institution were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups, the elderly group (≥80 years) and non-elderly group (<80 years), and we compared the effective recanalization rate (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b-3), good outcome rate (modified Rankin Scale 0–2 at 90 days), time from groin puncture to recanalization (P to R), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality rate between them retrospectively. Eligible patients for MT were judged using the Japanese stroke guidelines, and the selection criteria were more carefully applied to elderly patients. RESULTS: MT was performed on 48 elderly patients (29.1%) and 117 non-elderly patients (70.9%). On the other hand, 10 elderly patients (19.6%) and 5 non-elderly patients (5.4%) did not undergo MT even though they met the inclusion criteria. There were significantly fewer male patients and smokers in the elderly group, but other baseline and clinical characteristics were not significantly different between the groups. Effective recanalization (elderly 93.8% vs non-elderly 91.5%), good outcome (45.8% vs 60.7%), P to R (33.5 minutes vs 33.5 minutes), sICH (2.1% vs 4.3%), and mortality (8.3% vs 2.6%) were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: When recanalization was achieved by strict preoperative evaluation of clinical conditions and imaging, MT may be safe and effective even for octogenarians or older patients. |
---|