Cargando…
Rapid Response System for In-Hospital Large Vessel Occlusion: A Case-Control Study
OBJECTIVE: Acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) in hospitalized patients is relatively rare but important condition. However, unlike community-onset cases, there are only few time-saving protocols for in-hospital LVO. This study aimed to evaluate the time-saving effects of rapid...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10371004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502264 http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2020-0203 |
_version_ | 1785078060756762624 |
---|---|
author | Fujiwara, Satoru Ohara, Nobuyuki Imamura, Hirotoshi Seo, Ryutaro Nagata, Kazuma Shimizu, Hayato Kawamoto, Michi Kohara, Nobuo Sakai, Nobuyuki |
author_facet | Fujiwara, Satoru Ohara, Nobuyuki Imamura, Hirotoshi Seo, Ryutaro Nagata, Kazuma Shimizu, Hayato Kawamoto, Michi Kohara, Nobuo Sakai, Nobuyuki |
author_sort | Fujiwara, Satoru |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) in hospitalized patients is relatively rare but important condition. However, unlike community-onset cases, there are only few time-saving protocols for in-hospital LVO. This study aimed to evaluate the time-saving effects of rapid response system (RRS) for the management of in-hospital LVO. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive in-hospital LVO patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy (MT) between April 2015 and January 2020. In November 2017, we added “acute hemiparesis, eye deviation, and convulsive seizures” to the activation criteria for RRS. In this protocol, the patient is immediately transported from the ward to the emergency room (ER) by Medical Emergency Team (MET). The stroke team can then start assessment in the same manner as for community-onset cases. The time metrics between those with and without RRS intervention were compared. The primary outcome was time from detection to the first assessment by stroke team and to initial CT. To investigate the validity of the revised criteria, we also analyzed all RRS-activated cases. RESULTS: In total, 26 patients (RRS group, 11 patients; non-RRS group, 15 patients) were included. The median time from detection to stroke team assessment (10.0 [interquartile range: IQR, 8–15] minutes vs 65.5 [18–89] minutes) and to CT (22.0 [16–31] minutes vs. 46.5 [35–93] minutes) were significantly shorter in the RRS group. RRS was activated in 34 patients (mean, 1.3/month) according to the added criteria, of whom 20 (58.8%) had cerebral infarction and 9 underwent MT. About two-thirds of the other patients developed neurological emergencies (e.g., epileptic seizure, syncope, or hypoglycemia) that required acute care. CONCLUSION: RRS has the potential to shorten response time efficiently in the management of in-hospital LVO. Prompt transportation of the patient to the ER by MET enables faster intervention by the stroke team. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10371004 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103710042023-07-27 Rapid Response System for In-Hospital Large Vessel Occlusion: A Case-Control Study Fujiwara, Satoru Ohara, Nobuyuki Imamura, Hirotoshi Seo, Ryutaro Nagata, Kazuma Shimizu, Hayato Kawamoto, Michi Kohara, Nobuo Sakai, Nobuyuki J Neuroendovasc Ther Original Article OBJECTIVE: Acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) in hospitalized patients is relatively rare but important condition. However, unlike community-onset cases, there are only few time-saving protocols for in-hospital LVO. This study aimed to evaluate the time-saving effects of rapid response system (RRS) for the management of in-hospital LVO. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive in-hospital LVO patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy (MT) between April 2015 and January 2020. In November 2017, we added “acute hemiparesis, eye deviation, and convulsive seizures” to the activation criteria for RRS. In this protocol, the patient is immediately transported from the ward to the emergency room (ER) by Medical Emergency Team (MET). The stroke team can then start assessment in the same manner as for community-onset cases. The time metrics between those with and without RRS intervention were compared. The primary outcome was time from detection to the first assessment by stroke team and to initial CT. To investigate the validity of the revised criteria, we also analyzed all RRS-activated cases. RESULTS: In total, 26 patients (RRS group, 11 patients; non-RRS group, 15 patients) were included. The median time from detection to stroke team assessment (10.0 [interquartile range: IQR, 8–15] minutes vs 65.5 [18–89] minutes) and to CT (22.0 [16–31] minutes vs. 46.5 [35–93] minutes) were significantly shorter in the RRS group. RRS was activated in 34 patients (mean, 1.3/month) according to the added criteria, of whom 20 (58.8%) had cerebral infarction and 9 underwent MT. About two-thirds of the other patients developed neurological emergencies (e.g., epileptic seizure, syncope, or hypoglycemia) that required acute care. CONCLUSION: RRS has the potential to shorten response time efficiently in the management of in-hospital LVO. Prompt transportation of the patient to the ER by MET enables faster intervention by the stroke team. The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy 2021-02-25 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC10371004/ /pubmed/37502264 http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2020-0203 Text en ©2021 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Article Fujiwara, Satoru Ohara, Nobuyuki Imamura, Hirotoshi Seo, Ryutaro Nagata, Kazuma Shimizu, Hayato Kawamoto, Michi Kohara, Nobuo Sakai, Nobuyuki Rapid Response System for In-Hospital Large Vessel Occlusion: A Case-Control Study |
title | Rapid Response System for In-Hospital Large Vessel Occlusion: A Case-Control Study |
title_full | Rapid Response System for In-Hospital Large Vessel Occlusion: A Case-Control Study |
title_fullStr | Rapid Response System for In-Hospital Large Vessel Occlusion: A Case-Control Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Rapid Response System for In-Hospital Large Vessel Occlusion: A Case-Control Study |
title_short | Rapid Response System for In-Hospital Large Vessel Occlusion: A Case-Control Study |
title_sort | rapid response system for in-hospital large vessel occlusion: a case-control study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10371004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502264 http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2020-0203 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fujiwarasatoru rapidresponsesystemforinhospitallargevesselocclusionacasecontrolstudy AT oharanobuyuki rapidresponsesystemforinhospitallargevesselocclusionacasecontrolstudy AT imamurahirotoshi rapidresponsesystemforinhospitallargevesselocclusionacasecontrolstudy AT seoryutaro rapidresponsesystemforinhospitallargevesselocclusionacasecontrolstudy AT nagatakazuma rapidresponsesystemforinhospitallargevesselocclusionacasecontrolstudy AT shimizuhayato rapidresponsesystemforinhospitallargevesselocclusionacasecontrolstudy AT kawamotomichi rapidresponsesystemforinhospitallargevesselocclusionacasecontrolstudy AT koharanobuo rapidresponsesystemforinhospitallargevesselocclusionacasecontrolstudy AT sakainobuyuki rapidresponsesystemforinhospitallargevesselocclusionacasecontrolstudy |