Cargando…

Rapid Response System for In-Hospital Large Vessel Occlusion: A Case-Control Study

OBJECTIVE: Acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) in hospitalized patients is relatively rare but important condition. However, unlike community-onset cases, there are only few time-saving protocols for in-hospital LVO. This study aimed to evaluate the time-saving effects of rapid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fujiwara, Satoru, Ohara, Nobuyuki, Imamura, Hirotoshi, Seo, Ryutaro, Nagata, Kazuma, Shimizu, Hayato, Kawamoto, Michi, Kohara, Nobuo, Sakai, Nobuyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10371004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502264
http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2020-0203
_version_ 1785078060756762624
author Fujiwara, Satoru
Ohara, Nobuyuki
Imamura, Hirotoshi
Seo, Ryutaro
Nagata, Kazuma
Shimizu, Hayato
Kawamoto, Michi
Kohara, Nobuo
Sakai, Nobuyuki
author_facet Fujiwara, Satoru
Ohara, Nobuyuki
Imamura, Hirotoshi
Seo, Ryutaro
Nagata, Kazuma
Shimizu, Hayato
Kawamoto, Michi
Kohara, Nobuo
Sakai, Nobuyuki
author_sort Fujiwara, Satoru
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) in hospitalized patients is relatively rare but important condition. However, unlike community-onset cases, there are only few time-saving protocols for in-hospital LVO. This study aimed to evaluate the time-saving effects of rapid response system (RRS) for the management of in-hospital LVO. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive in-hospital LVO patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy (MT) between April 2015 and January 2020. In November 2017, we added “acute hemiparesis, eye deviation, and convulsive seizures” to the activation criteria for RRS. In this protocol, the patient is immediately transported from the ward to the emergency room (ER) by Medical Emergency Team (MET). The stroke team can then start assessment in the same manner as for community-onset cases. The time metrics between those with and without RRS intervention were compared. The primary outcome was time from detection to the first assessment by stroke team and to initial CT. To investigate the validity of the revised criteria, we also analyzed all RRS-activated cases. RESULTS: In total, 26 patients (RRS group, 11 patients; non-RRS group, 15 patients) were included. The median time from detection to stroke team assessment (10.0 [interquartile range: IQR, 8–15] minutes vs 65.5 [18–89] minutes) and to CT (22.0 [16–31] minutes vs. 46.5 [35–93] minutes) were significantly shorter in the RRS group. RRS was activated in 34 patients (mean, 1.3/month) according to the added criteria, of whom 20 (58.8%) had cerebral infarction and 9 underwent MT. About two-thirds of the other patients developed neurological emergencies (e.g., epileptic seizure, syncope, or hypoglycemia) that required acute care. CONCLUSION: RRS has the potential to shorten response time efficiently in the management of in-hospital LVO. Prompt transportation of the patient to the ER by MET enables faster intervention by the stroke team.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10371004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103710042023-07-27 Rapid Response System for In-Hospital Large Vessel Occlusion: A Case-Control Study Fujiwara, Satoru Ohara, Nobuyuki Imamura, Hirotoshi Seo, Ryutaro Nagata, Kazuma Shimizu, Hayato Kawamoto, Michi Kohara, Nobuo Sakai, Nobuyuki J Neuroendovasc Ther Original Article OBJECTIVE: Acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) in hospitalized patients is relatively rare but important condition. However, unlike community-onset cases, there are only few time-saving protocols for in-hospital LVO. This study aimed to evaluate the time-saving effects of rapid response system (RRS) for the management of in-hospital LVO. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive in-hospital LVO patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy (MT) between April 2015 and January 2020. In November 2017, we added “acute hemiparesis, eye deviation, and convulsive seizures” to the activation criteria for RRS. In this protocol, the patient is immediately transported from the ward to the emergency room (ER) by Medical Emergency Team (MET). The stroke team can then start assessment in the same manner as for community-onset cases. The time metrics between those with and without RRS intervention were compared. The primary outcome was time from detection to the first assessment by stroke team and to initial CT. To investigate the validity of the revised criteria, we also analyzed all RRS-activated cases. RESULTS: In total, 26 patients (RRS group, 11 patients; non-RRS group, 15 patients) were included. The median time from detection to stroke team assessment (10.0 [interquartile range: IQR, 8–15] minutes vs 65.5 [18–89] minutes) and to CT (22.0 [16–31] minutes vs. 46.5 [35–93] minutes) were significantly shorter in the RRS group. RRS was activated in 34 patients (mean, 1.3/month) according to the added criteria, of whom 20 (58.8%) had cerebral infarction and 9 underwent MT. About two-thirds of the other patients developed neurological emergencies (e.g., epileptic seizure, syncope, or hypoglycemia) that required acute care. CONCLUSION: RRS has the potential to shorten response time efficiently in the management of in-hospital LVO. Prompt transportation of the patient to the ER by MET enables faster intervention by the stroke team. The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy 2021-02-25 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC10371004/ /pubmed/37502264 http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2020-0203 Text en ©2021 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Fujiwara, Satoru
Ohara, Nobuyuki
Imamura, Hirotoshi
Seo, Ryutaro
Nagata, Kazuma
Shimizu, Hayato
Kawamoto, Michi
Kohara, Nobuo
Sakai, Nobuyuki
Rapid Response System for In-Hospital Large Vessel Occlusion: A Case-Control Study
title Rapid Response System for In-Hospital Large Vessel Occlusion: A Case-Control Study
title_full Rapid Response System for In-Hospital Large Vessel Occlusion: A Case-Control Study
title_fullStr Rapid Response System for In-Hospital Large Vessel Occlusion: A Case-Control Study
title_full_unstemmed Rapid Response System for In-Hospital Large Vessel Occlusion: A Case-Control Study
title_short Rapid Response System for In-Hospital Large Vessel Occlusion: A Case-Control Study
title_sort rapid response system for in-hospital large vessel occlusion: a case-control study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10371004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37502264
http://dx.doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2020-0203
work_keys_str_mv AT fujiwarasatoru rapidresponsesystemforinhospitallargevesselocclusionacasecontrolstudy
AT oharanobuyuki rapidresponsesystemforinhospitallargevesselocclusionacasecontrolstudy
AT imamurahirotoshi rapidresponsesystemforinhospitallargevesselocclusionacasecontrolstudy
AT seoryutaro rapidresponsesystemforinhospitallargevesselocclusionacasecontrolstudy
AT nagatakazuma rapidresponsesystemforinhospitallargevesselocclusionacasecontrolstudy
AT shimizuhayato rapidresponsesystemforinhospitallargevesselocclusionacasecontrolstudy
AT kawamotomichi rapidresponsesystemforinhospitallargevesselocclusionacasecontrolstudy
AT koharanobuo rapidresponsesystemforinhospitallargevesselocclusionacasecontrolstudy
AT sakainobuyuki rapidresponsesystemforinhospitallargevesselocclusionacasecontrolstudy