Cargando…
Positive Correlation Between Social Media Utilization by Orthopaedic Journals and Impact Factor
Social media use has exploded in popularity over the past decade with over 1.5 billion users on Facebook and 320 million users on Twitter. The aim of this study was to analyze the use of social media by orthopaedic journals and determine whether a relationship exists between social media followers a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10371319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37493626 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00009 |
_version_ | 1785078121789128704 |
---|---|
author | Shaath, M. Kareem Kerr, Matthew S. Schwartzman, Jonathan D. Avilucea, Frank R. Munro, Mark W. Langford, Joshua R. Haidukewych, George J. |
author_facet | Shaath, M. Kareem Kerr, Matthew S. Schwartzman, Jonathan D. Avilucea, Frank R. Munro, Mark W. Langford, Joshua R. Haidukewych, George J. |
author_sort | Shaath, M. Kareem |
collection | PubMed |
description | Social media use has exploded in popularity over the past decade with over 1.5 billion users on Facebook and 320 million users on Twitter. The aim of this study was to analyze the use of social media by orthopaedic journals and determine whether a relationship exists between social media followers and journal impact factor. METHODS: The Clarivate Analytics Impact Factor tool was used to identify all orthopaedic journals with a 2022 impact factor of greater than 1.5. We then conducted a query on Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook to determine which programs had pages on each platform. RESULTS: Seventeen journals were included across all orthopaedic subspecialties. Of the 17 journals, 14 (82.4%) had a Facebook page, eight (47%) had an Instagram page, 15 (88.2%) had a Twitter account, and 8 (47%) had a LinkedIn profile. When compiling the number of followers by social media platform, Twitter had the most (177,543), followed by Facebook (149,388), Instagram (81,739), and LinkedIn (77,459). We found a significant correlation between the number of social media followers and journal impact factor (Pearson correlation coefficient [PCC] = 0.67; P = 0.003). When analyzing each social media platform independently, we found a significant correlation between the number of Facebook and Twitter followers and journal impact factor (PCC = 0.54; P = 0.02 and PCC = 0.80; P < 0.001, respectively). DISCUSSION: We have shown a notable association between the number of social media followers and a journal's impact factor. With the increasing shift toward online distribution, orthopaedic journals may use our data when evaluating their social media strategy to maintain and potentially increase their exposure and potentially their impact factor. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10371319 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103713192023-07-27 Positive Correlation Between Social Media Utilization by Orthopaedic Journals and Impact Factor Shaath, M. Kareem Kerr, Matthew S. Schwartzman, Jonathan D. Avilucea, Frank R. Munro, Mark W. Langford, Joshua R. Haidukewych, George J. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev Research Article Social media use has exploded in popularity over the past decade with over 1.5 billion users on Facebook and 320 million users on Twitter. The aim of this study was to analyze the use of social media by orthopaedic journals and determine whether a relationship exists between social media followers and journal impact factor. METHODS: The Clarivate Analytics Impact Factor tool was used to identify all orthopaedic journals with a 2022 impact factor of greater than 1.5. We then conducted a query on Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook to determine which programs had pages on each platform. RESULTS: Seventeen journals were included across all orthopaedic subspecialties. Of the 17 journals, 14 (82.4%) had a Facebook page, eight (47%) had an Instagram page, 15 (88.2%) had a Twitter account, and 8 (47%) had a LinkedIn profile. When compiling the number of followers by social media platform, Twitter had the most (177,543), followed by Facebook (149,388), Instagram (81,739), and LinkedIn (77,459). We found a significant correlation between the number of social media followers and journal impact factor (Pearson correlation coefficient [PCC] = 0.67; P = 0.003). When analyzing each social media platform independently, we found a significant correlation between the number of Facebook and Twitter followers and journal impact factor (PCC = 0.54; P = 0.02 and PCC = 0.80; P < 0.001, respectively). DISCUSSION: We have shown a notable association between the number of social media followers and a journal's impact factor. With the increasing shift toward online distribution, orthopaedic journals may use our data when evaluating their social media strategy to maintain and potentially increase their exposure and potentially their impact factor. Wolters Kluwer 2023-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10371319/ /pubmed/37493626 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00009 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Shaath, M. Kareem Kerr, Matthew S. Schwartzman, Jonathan D. Avilucea, Frank R. Munro, Mark W. Langford, Joshua R. Haidukewych, George J. Positive Correlation Between Social Media Utilization by Orthopaedic Journals and Impact Factor |
title | Positive Correlation Between Social Media Utilization by Orthopaedic Journals and Impact Factor |
title_full | Positive Correlation Between Social Media Utilization by Orthopaedic Journals and Impact Factor |
title_fullStr | Positive Correlation Between Social Media Utilization by Orthopaedic Journals and Impact Factor |
title_full_unstemmed | Positive Correlation Between Social Media Utilization by Orthopaedic Journals and Impact Factor |
title_short | Positive Correlation Between Social Media Utilization by Orthopaedic Journals and Impact Factor |
title_sort | positive correlation between social media utilization by orthopaedic journals and impact factor |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10371319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37493626 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shaathmkareem positivecorrelationbetweensocialmediautilizationbyorthopaedicjournalsandimpactfactor AT kerrmatthews positivecorrelationbetweensocialmediautilizationbyorthopaedicjournalsandimpactfactor AT schwartzmanjonathand positivecorrelationbetweensocialmediautilizationbyorthopaedicjournalsandimpactfactor AT aviluceafrankr positivecorrelationbetweensocialmediautilizationbyorthopaedicjournalsandimpactfactor AT munromarkw positivecorrelationbetweensocialmediautilizationbyorthopaedicjournalsandimpactfactor AT langfordjoshuar positivecorrelationbetweensocialmediautilizationbyorthopaedicjournalsandimpactfactor AT haidukewychgeorgej positivecorrelationbetweensocialmediautilizationbyorthopaedicjournalsandimpactfactor |