Cargando…

Positive Correlation Between Social Media Utilization by Orthopaedic Journals and Impact Factor

Social media use has exploded in popularity over the past decade with over 1.5 billion users on Facebook and 320 million users on Twitter. The aim of this study was to analyze the use of social media by orthopaedic journals and determine whether a relationship exists between social media followers a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shaath, M. Kareem, Kerr, Matthew S., Schwartzman, Jonathan D., Avilucea, Frank R., Munro, Mark W., Langford, Joshua R., Haidukewych, George J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10371319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37493626
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00009
_version_ 1785078121789128704
author Shaath, M. Kareem
Kerr, Matthew S.
Schwartzman, Jonathan D.
Avilucea, Frank R.
Munro, Mark W.
Langford, Joshua R.
Haidukewych, George J.
author_facet Shaath, M. Kareem
Kerr, Matthew S.
Schwartzman, Jonathan D.
Avilucea, Frank R.
Munro, Mark W.
Langford, Joshua R.
Haidukewych, George J.
author_sort Shaath, M. Kareem
collection PubMed
description Social media use has exploded in popularity over the past decade with over 1.5 billion users on Facebook and 320 million users on Twitter. The aim of this study was to analyze the use of social media by orthopaedic journals and determine whether a relationship exists between social media followers and journal impact factor. METHODS: The Clarivate Analytics Impact Factor tool was used to identify all orthopaedic journals with a 2022 impact factor of greater than 1.5. We then conducted a query on Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook to determine which programs had pages on each platform. RESULTS: Seventeen journals were included across all orthopaedic subspecialties. Of the 17 journals, 14 (82.4%) had a Facebook page, eight (47%) had an Instagram page, 15 (88.2%) had a Twitter account, and 8 (47%) had a LinkedIn profile. When compiling the number of followers by social media platform, Twitter had the most (177,543), followed by Facebook (149,388), Instagram (81,739), and LinkedIn (77,459). We found a significant correlation between the number of social media followers and journal impact factor (Pearson correlation coefficient [PCC] = 0.67; P = 0.003). When analyzing each social media platform independently, we found a significant correlation between the number of Facebook and Twitter followers and journal impact factor (PCC = 0.54; P = 0.02 and PCC = 0.80; P < 0.001, respectively). DISCUSSION: We have shown a notable association between the number of social media followers and a journal's impact factor. With the increasing shift toward online distribution, orthopaedic journals may use our data when evaluating their social media strategy to maintain and potentially increase their exposure and potentially their impact factor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10371319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103713192023-07-27 Positive Correlation Between Social Media Utilization by Orthopaedic Journals and Impact Factor Shaath, M. Kareem Kerr, Matthew S. Schwartzman, Jonathan D. Avilucea, Frank R. Munro, Mark W. Langford, Joshua R. Haidukewych, George J. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev Research Article Social media use has exploded in popularity over the past decade with over 1.5 billion users on Facebook and 320 million users on Twitter. The aim of this study was to analyze the use of social media by orthopaedic journals and determine whether a relationship exists between social media followers and journal impact factor. METHODS: The Clarivate Analytics Impact Factor tool was used to identify all orthopaedic journals with a 2022 impact factor of greater than 1.5. We then conducted a query on Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook to determine which programs had pages on each platform. RESULTS: Seventeen journals were included across all orthopaedic subspecialties. Of the 17 journals, 14 (82.4%) had a Facebook page, eight (47%) had an Instagram page, 15 (88.2%) had a Twitter account, and 8 (47%) had a LinkedIn profile. When compiling the number of followers by social media platform, Twitter had the most (177,543), followed by Facebook (149,388), Instagram (81,739), and LinkedIn (77,459). We found a significant correlation between the number of social media followers and journal impact factor (Pearson correlation coefficient [PCC] = 0.67; P = 0.003). When analyzing each social media platform independently, we found a significant correlation between the number of Facebook and Twitter followers and journal impact factor (PCC = 0.54; P = 0.02 and PCC = 0.80; P < 0.001, respectively). DISCUSSION: We have shown a notable association between the number of social media followers and a journal's impact factor. With the increasing shift toward online distribution, orthopaedic journals may use our data when evaluating their social media strategy to maintain and potentially increase their exposure and potentially their impact factor. Wolters Kluwer 2023-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10371319/ /pubmed/37493626 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00009 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shaath, M. Kareem
Kerr, Matthew S.
Schwartzman, Jonathan D.
Avilucea, Frank R.
Munro, Mark W.
Langford, Joshua R.
Haidukewych, George J.
Positive Correlation Between Social Media Utilization by Orthopaedic Journals and Impact Factor
title Positive Correlation Between Social Media Utilization by Orthopaedic Journals and Impact Factor
title_full Positive Correlation Between Social Media Utilization by Orthopaedic Journals and Impact Factor
title_fullStr Positive Correlation Between Social Media Utilization by Orthopaedic Journals and Impact Factor
title_full_unstemmed Positive Correlation Between Social Media Utilization by Orthopaedic Journals and Impact Factor
title_short Positive Correlation Between Social Media Utilization by Orthopaedic Journals and Impact Factor
title_sort positive correlation between social media utilization by orthopaedic journals and impact factor
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10371319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37493626
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00009
work_keys_str_mv AT shaathmkareem positivecorrelationbetweensocialmediautilizationbyorthopaedicjournalsandimpactfactor
AT kerrmatthews positivecorrelationbetweensocialmediautilizationbyorthopaedicjournalsandimpactfactor
AT schwartzmanjonathand positivecorrelationbetweensocialmediautilizationbyorthopaedicjournalsandimpactfactor
AT aviluceafrankr positivecorrelationbetweensocialmediautilizationbyorthopaedicjournalsandimpactfactor
AT munromarkw positivecorrelationbetweensocialmediautilizationbyorthopaedicjournalsandimpactfactor
AT langfordjoshuar positivecorrelationbetweensocialmediautilizationbyorthopaedicjournalsandimpactfactor
AT haidukewychgeorgej positivecorrelationbetweensocialmediautilizationbyorthopaedicjournalsandimpactfactor