Cargando…
Who is in the emergency room matters when we talk about door-to-needle time: a single-center experience
Background The efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is time-dependent. Objective To compare the door-to-needle (DTN) time of stroke neurologists (SNs) versus non-stroke neurologists (NSNs) and emergency room physicians (EPs). Additionally, we aimed to determine elements associated with DTN ≤...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10371412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37402398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768672 |
_version_ | 1785078140395061248 |
---|---|
author | Brunser, Alejandro M. Nuñez, Juan-Cristobal Mansilla, Eloy Cavada, Gabriel Olavarría, Verónica Muñoz Venturelli, Paula Lavados, Pablo M. |
author_facet | Brunser, Alejandro M. Nuñez, Juan-Cristobal Mansilla, Eloy Cavada, Gabriel Olavarría, Verónica Muñoz Venturelli, Paula Lavados, Pablo M. |
author_sort | Brunser, Alejandro M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background The efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is time-dependent. Objective To compare the door-to-needle (DTN) time of stroke neurologists (SNs) versus non-stroke neurologists (NSNs) and emergency room physicians (EPs). Additionally, we aimed to determine elements associated with DTN ≤ 20 minutes. Methods Prospective study of patients with IVT treated at Clínica Alemana between June 2016 and September 2021. Results A total of 301 patients underwent treatment for IVT. The mean DTN time was 43.3 ± 23.6 minutes. One hundred seventy-three (57.4%) patients were evaluated by SNs, 122 (40.5%) by NSNs, and 6 (2.1%) by EPs. The mean DTN times were 40.8 ± 23, 46 ± 24.7, and 58 ± 22.5 minutes, respectively. Door-to-needle time ≤ 20 minutes occurred more frequently when patients were treated by SNs compared to NSNs and EPs: 15%, 4%, and 0%, respectively (odds ratio [OR]: 4.3, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.66–11.5, p = 0.004). In univariate analysis DTN time ≤ 20 minutes was associated with treatment by a SN ( p = 0.002), coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic period ( p = 0.21), time to emergency room (ER) ( p = 0.21), presence of diabetes ( p = 0.142), hypercholesterolemia ( p = 0.007), atrial fibrillation ( p < 0.09), score on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ( p = 0.001), lower systolic ( p = 0.143) and diastolic ( p = 0.21) blood pressures, the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS; p = 0.09), vessel occlusion ( p = 0.05), use of tenecteplase ( p = 0.18), thrombectomy ( p = 0.13), and years of experience of the physician ( p < 0.001). After multivariate analysis, being treated by a SN (OR: 3.95; 95%CI: 1.44–10.8; p = 0.007), NIHSS (OR: 1.07; 95%CI: 1.02–1.12; p < 0.002) and lower systolic blood pressure (OR: 0.98; 95%CI: 0.96–0.99; p < 0.003) remained significant. Conclusion Treatment by a SN resulted in a higher probability of treating the patient in a DTN time within 20 minutes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10371412 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103714122023-07-27 Who is in the emergency room matters when we talk about door-to-needle time: a single-center experience Brunser, Alejandro M. Nuñez, Juan-Cristobal Mansilla, Eloy Cavada, Gabriel Olavarría, Verónica Muñoz Venturelli, Paula Lavados, Pablo M. Arq Neuropsiquiatr Background The efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is time-dependent. Objective To compare the door-to-needle (DTN) time of stroke neurologists (SNs) versus non-stroke neurologists (NSNs) and emergency room physicians (EPs). Additionally, we aimed to determine elements associated with DTN ≤ 20 minutes. Methods Prospective study of patients with IVT treated at Clínica Alemana between June 2016 and September 2021. Results A total of 301 patients underwent treatment for IVT. The mean DTN time was 43.3 ± 23.6 minutes. One hundred seventy-three (57.4%) patients were evaluated by SNs, 122 (40.5%) by NSNs, and 6 (2.1%) by EPs. The mean DTN times were 40.8 ± 23, 46 ± 24.7, and 58 ± 22.5 minutes, respectively. Door-to-needle time ≤ 20 minutes occurred more frequently when patients were treated by SNs compared to NSNs and EPs: 15%, 4%, and 0%, respectively (odds ratio [OR]: 4.3, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.66–11.5, p = 0.004). In univariate analysis DTN time ≤ 20 minutes was associated with treatment by a SN ( p = 0.002), coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic period ( p = 0.21), time to emergency room (ER) ( p = 0.21), presence of diabetes ( p = 0.142), hypercholesterolemia ( p = 0.007), atrial fibrillation ( p < 0.09), score on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ( p = 0.001), lower systolic ( p = 0.143) and diastolic ( p = 0.21) blood pressures, the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS; p = 0.09), vessel occlusion ( p = 0.05), use of tenecteplase ( p = 0.18), thrombectomy ( p = 0.13), and years of experience of the physician ( p < 0.001). After multivariate analysis, being treated by a SN (OR: 3.95; 95%CI: 1.44–10.8; p = 0.007), NIHSS (OR: 1.07; 95%CI: 1.02–1.12; p < 0.002) and lower systolic blood pressure (OR: 0.98; 95%CI: 0.96–0.99; p < 0.003) remained significant. Conclusion Treatment by a SN resulted in a higher probability of treating the patient in a DTN time within 20 minutes. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2023-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10371412/ /pubmed/37402398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768672 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Brunser, Alejandro M. Nuñez, Juan-Cristobal Mansilla, Eloy Cavada, Gabriel Olavarría, Verónica Muñoz Venturelli, Paula Lavados, Pablo M. Who is in the emergency room matters when we talk about door-to-needle time: a single-center experience |
title | Who is in the emergency room matters when we talk about door-to-needle time: a single-center experience |
title_full | Who is in the emergency room matters when we talk about door-to-needle time: a single-center experience |
title_fullStr | Who is in the emergency room matters when we talk about door-to-needle time: a single-center experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Who is in the emergency room matters when we talk about door-to-needle time: a single-center experience |
title_short | Who is in the emergency room matters when we talk about door-to-needle time: a single-center experience |
title_sort | who is in the emergency room matters when we talk about door-to-needle time: a single-center experience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10371412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37402398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768672 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brunseralejandrom whoisintheemergencyroommatterswhenwetalkaboutdoortoneedletimeasinglecenterexperience AT nunezjuancristobal whoisintheemergencyroommatterswhenwetalkaboutdoortoneedletimeasinglecenterexperience AT mansillaeloy whoisintheemergencyroommatterswhenwetalkaboutdoortoneedletimeasinglecenterexperience AT cavadagabriel whoisintheemergencyroommatterswhenwetalkaboutdoortoneedletimeasinglecenterexperience AT olavarriaveronica whoisintheemergencyroommatterswhenwetalkaboutdoortoneedletimeasinglecenterexperience AT munozventurellipaula whoisintheemergencyroommatterswhenwetalkaboutdoortoneedletimeasinglecenterexperience AT lavadospablom whoisintheemergencyroommatterswhenwetalkaboutdoortoneedletimeasinglecenterexperience |