Cargando…

Functional epiphora: an under-reported entity

PURPOSE: To determine the etiology of epiphora in a tertiary Australian lacrimal clinic and highlight the high proportion of ‘functional’ cases. METHODS: Single-center retrospective review: Records of adult patients presenting to a tertiary lacrimal clinic from January 2011 to February 2021 with epi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Usmani, Eiman, Shapira, Yinon, Selva, Dinesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10371897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36952153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-023-02668-4
_version_ 1785078251463376896
author Usmani, Eiman
Shapira, Yinon
Selva, Dinesh
author_facet Usmani, Eiman
Shapira, Yinon
Selva, Dinesh
author_sort Usmani, Eiman
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine the etiology of epiphora in a tertiary Australian lacrimal clinic and highlight the high proportion of ‘functional’ cases. METHODS: Single-center retrospective review: Records of adult patients presenting to a tertiary lacrimal clinic from January 2011 to February 2021 with epiphora were reviewed. Patients underwent testing with syringing/probing and lacrimal imaging to reach a diagnosis of functional epiphora. Functional epiphora was diagnosed based on the exclusion of alternate causes of epiphora on clinical examination, patent lacrimal syringing, normal dacryocystography, and delay on dacryoscintigraphy. RESULTS: Five hundred and seventy-six symptomatic eyes of 372 adult patients (mean 66.2 ± 15.5 years, 63.4% females) with epiphora were evaluated for causes. Post-sac obstruction (stenosis/complete obstruction) and functional epiphora (non-anatomical delay) were the most common causes of presentations to the lacrimal clinic (26% each). Functional epiphora with post-sac delay was substantially more common than functional epiphora with pre-sac delay (89% vs. 11% of functional epiphora cases). In 16% of the cases, no cause for the epiphora was found while more than one cause (multifactorial) was present 11% of the time. CONCLUSION: Functional epiphora was found to be as common as a nasolacrimal anatomical obstruction when lacrimal imaging is utilized.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10371897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103718972023-07-28 Functional epiphora: an under-reported entity Usmani, Eiman Shapira, Yinon Selva, Dinesh Int Ophthalmol Original Paper PURPOSE: To determine the etiology of epiphora in a tertiary Australian lacrimal clinic and highlight the high proportion of ‘functional’ cases. METHODS: Single-center retrospective review: Records of adult patients presenting to a tertiary lacrimal clinic from January 2011 to February 2021 with epiphora were reviewed. Patients underwent testing with syringing/probing and lacrimal imaging to reach a diagnosis of functional epiphora. Functional epiphora was diagnosed based on the exclusion of alternate causes of epiphora on clinical examination, patent lacrimal syringing, normal dacryocystography, and delay on dacryoscintigraphy. RESULTS: Five hundred and seventy-six symptomatic eyes of 372 adult patients (mean 66.2 ± 15.5 years, 63.4% females) with epiphora were evaluated for causes. Post-sac obstruction (stenosis/complete obstruction) and functional epiphora (non-anatomical delay) were the most common causes of presentations to the lacrimal clinic (26% each). Functional epiphora with post-sac delay was substantially more common than functional epiphora with pre-sac delay (89% vs. 11% of functional epiphora cases). In 16% of the cases, no cause for the epiphora was found while more than one cause (multifactorial) was present 11% of the time. CONCLUSION: Functional epiphora was found to be as common as a nasolacrimal anatomical obstruction when lacrimal imaging is utilized. Springer Netherlands 2023-03-23 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10371897/ /pubmed/36952153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-023-02668-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Usmani, Eiman
Shapira, Yinon
Selva, Dinesh
Functional epiphora: an under-reported entity
title Functional epiphora: an under-reported entity
title_full Functional epiphora: an under-reported entity
title_fullStr Functional epiphora: an under-reported entity
title_full_unstemmed Functional epiphora: an under-reported entity
title_short Functional epiphora: an under-reported entity
title_sort functional epiphora: an under-reported entity
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10371897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36952153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-023-02668-4
work_keys_str_mv AT usmanieiman functionalepiphoraanunderreportedentity
AT shapirayinon functionalepiphoraanunderreportedentity
AT selvadinesh functionalepiphoraanunderreportedentity