Cargando…

Development and psychometric evaluation of nurses’ health-related procrastination scale

There is no valid scale to measure health related procrastination, especially in nurses. This study was conducted to design and assess the psychometric properties of the health-related procrastination scale in nurses. This exploratory mixed method study was conducted between April 2017 and May 2019....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Basirimoghadam, Mahdi, Rafii, Forough, Ebadi, Abbas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10372369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37519648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18145
_version_ 1785078359611408384
author Basirimoghadam, Mahdi
Rafii, Forough
Ebadi, Abbas
author_facet Basirimoghadam, Mahdi
Rafii, Forough
Ebadi, Abbas
author_sort Basirimoghadam, Mahdi
collection PubMed
description There is no valid scale to measure health related procrastination, especially in nurses. This study was conducted to design and assess the psychometric properties of the health-related procrastination scale in nurses. This exploratory mixed method study was conducted between April 2017 and May 2019. The design and psychometric assessment of the nurses' health-related procrastination scale (NHRPS) was carried out through quantitative and qualitative phases. In the qualitative phase, nurses were interviewed and a review of literature was carried out to generate the items. In the quantitative phase, the scale validity was evaluated using the face, content and construct validity and its reliability was evaluated through the Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, intra-class correlation coefficient, standard error of measurement, minimal detectable changes. The results of the exploratory factor analysis showed that, with 29 items and five factors, the NHRPS explains 54.81% of the variance in NHRPS. The results of confirmatory factor analysis also confirmed the final fit of model with five factors (RAMSEA: 0.08, CMIN/DF: 2.42, NFI: 0.92, PNFI: 0.83, CFI: 0.95, IFI: 0.95, RFI: 0.91, SRMR: 0.074). The Cronbach's alpha of the scale was 0.947, its intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.944, the Half-fold consistency coefficient was 0.970 and Omega internal consistency coefficient was 0.96. The NHRPS has good psychometric properties. This scale is suitable for research purposes, especially to plan for nurses' health promotion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10372369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103723692023-07-28 Development and psychometric evaluation of nurses’ health-related procrastination scale Basirimoghadam, Mahdi Rafii, Forough Ebadi, Abbas Heliyon Research Article There is no valid scale to measure health related procrastination, especially in nurses. This study was conducted to design and assess the psychometric properties of the health-related procrastination scale in nurses. This exploratory mixed method study was conducted between April 2017 and May 2019. The design and psychometric assessment of the nurses' health-related procrastination scale (NHRPS) was carried out through quantitative and qualitative phases. In the qualitative phase, nurses were interviewed and a review of literature was carried out to generate the items. In the quantitative phase, the scale validity was evaluated using the face, content and construct validity and its reliability was evaluated through the Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, intra-class correlation coefficient, standard error of measurement, minimal detectable changes. The results of the exploratory factor analysis showed that, with 29 items and five factors, the NHRPS explains 54.81% of the variance in NHRPS. The results of confirmatory factor analysis also confirmed the final fit of model with five factors (RAMSEA: 0.08, CMIN/DF: 2.42, NFI: 0.92, PNFI: 0.83, CFI: 0.95, IFI: 0.95, RFI: 0.91, SRMR: 0.074). The Cronbach's alpha of the scale was 0.947, its intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.944, the Half-fold consistency coefficient was 0.970 and Omega internal consistency coefficient was 0.96. The NHRPS has good psychometric properties. This scale is suitable for research purposes, especially to plan for nurses' health promotion. Elsevier 2023-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10372369/ /pubmed/37519648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18145 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Basirimoghadam, Mahdi
Rafii, Forough
Ebadi, Abbas
Development and psychometric evaluation of nurses’ health-related procrastination scale
title Development and psychometric evaluation of nurses’ health-related procrastination scale
title_full Development and psychometric evaluation of nurses’ health-related procrastination scale
title_fullStr Development and psychometric evaluation of nurses’ health-related procrastination scale
title_full_unstemmed Development and psychometric evaluation of nurses’ health-related procrastination scale
title_short Development and psychometric evaluation of nurses’ health-related procrastination scale
title_sort development and psychometric evaluation of nurses’ health-related procrastination scale
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10372369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37519648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18145
work_keys_str_mv AT basirimoghadammahdi developmentandpsychometricevaluationofnurseshealthrelatedprocrastinationscale
AT rafiiforough developmentandpsychometricevaluationofnurseshealthrelatedprocrastinationscale
AT ebadiabbas developmentandpsychometricevaluationofnurseshealthrelatedprocrastinationscale