Cargando…

Trends in add-on medications following metformin monotherapy for type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND: Although metformin is generally universally recommended as a first-line pharmacologic therapy for most people living with type 2 diabetes, second-line and third-line choices can require a tailored approach to achieve optimal blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin levels. OBJECTIVE: To exa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swart, Elizabeth CS, Neilson, Lynn M, Munshi, Kiraat D, Peasah, Samuel K, Henderson, Rochelle, Good, Chester B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36282929
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.11.1253
_version_ 1785078477521682432
author Swart, Elizabeth CS
Neilson, Lynn M
Munshi, Kiraat D
Peasah, Samuel K
Henderson, Rochelle
Good, Chester B
author_facet Swart, Elizabeth CS
Neilson, Lynn M
Munshi, Kiraat D
Peasah, Samuel K
Henderson, Rochelle
Good, Chester B
author_sort Swart, Elizabeth CS
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although metformin is generally universally recommended as a first-line pharmacologic therapy for most people living with type 2 diabetes, second-line and third-line choices can require a tailored approach to achieve optimal blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin levels. OBJECTIVE: To examine national trends in second- and third-line antihyperglycemic medications following metformin monotherapy, comparing 2015 and 2019. METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysis of deidentified pharmacy claims from a large national pharmacy benefits manager from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2015, and again in January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019, included adults (aged ≥ 18 years) continuously enrolled in commercial or Medicare insurance plans who filled an index metformin prescription in either year. Proportions of patients by second-line and third-line antihyperglycemic class were calculated. RESULTS: Second-line use of sulfonylureas (−10.1%; P < 0.001), combination drugs (−3.0%; P < 0.001), and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (−2.0%; P = 0.031) significantly declined, whereas second-line use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) (+4.9%; P < 0.001) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1Ras) (+10.0%; P < 0.001) significantly increased. Similarly, third-line use of sulfonylureas declined (−5.5%; P = 0.005), whereas third-line use of SGLT2is (+3.4%; P = 0.005) and GLP-1RAs (+8.3%; P < 0.001) increased. Similar trends between 2015 and 2019 were found in commercial and Medicare subgroups. Among all groups in 2015 compared with 2019, sulfonylureas were the most prescribed second-line class and insulins the most common third-line class. Although SGLT2i and GLP-1RA together represented more than one-third of second-line and third-line prescriptions for commercially insured patients in 2019 (34.3% and 35.0%, respectively), these classes were less frequently prescribed in the Medicare subgroup (18% and 25.6%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This report provides updated second-line and third-line antihyperglycemic medication prescribing trends in the United States, which suggests that evidence-based guidelines are being used in practice to prevent complications and individualize diabetes care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10373027
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103730272023-07-31 Trends in add-on medications following metformin monotherapy for type 2 diabetes Swart, Elizabeth CS Neilson, Lynn M Munshi, Kiraat D Peasah, Samuel K Henderson, Rochelle Good, Chester B J Manag Care Spec Pharm Research BACKGROUND: Although metformin is generally universally recommended as a first-line pharmacologic therapy for most people living with type 2 diabetes, second-line and third-line choices can require a tailored approach to achieve optimal blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin levels. OBJECTIVE: To examine national trends in second- and third-line antihyperglycemic medications following metformin monotherapy, comparing 2015 and 2019. METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysis of deidentified pharmacy claims from a large national pharmacy benefits manager from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2015, and again in January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019, included adults (aged ≥ 18 years) continuously enrolled in commercial or Medicare insurance plans who filled an index metformin prescription in either year. Proportions of patients by second-line and third-line antihyperglycemic class were calculated. RESULTS: Second-line use of sulfonylureas (−10.1%; P < 0.001), combination drugs (−3.0%; P < 0.001), and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (−2.0%; P = 0.031) significantly declined, whereas second-line use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) (+4.9%; P < 0.001) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1Ras) (+10.0%; P < 0.001) significantly increased. Similarly, third-line use of sulfonylureas declined (−5.5%; P = 0.005), whereas third-line use of SGLT2is (+3.4%; P = 0.005) and GLP-1RAs (+8.3%; P < 0.001) increased. Similar trends between 2015 and 2019 were found in commercial and Medicare subgroups. Among all groups in 2015 compared with 2019, sulfonylureas were the most prescribed second-line class and insulins the most common third-line class. Although SGLT2i and GLP-1RA together represented more than one-third of second-line and third-line prescriptions for commercially insured patients in 2019 (34.3% and 35.0%, respectively), these classes were less frequently prescribed in the Medicare subgroup (18% and 25.6%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This report provides updated second-line and third-line antihyperglycemic medication prescribing trends in the United States, which suggests that evidence-based guidelines are being used in practice to prevent complications and individualize diabetes care. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10373027/ /pubmed/36282929 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.11.1253 Text en Copyright © 2022, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research
Swart, Elizabeth CS
Neilson, Lynn M
Munshi, Kiraat D
Peasah, Samuel K
Henderson, Rochelle
Good, Chester B
Trends in add-on medications following metformin monotherapy for type 2 diabetes
title Trends in add-on medications following metformin monotherapy for type 2 diabetes
title_full Trends in add-on medications following metformin monotherapy for type 2 diabetes
title_fullStr Trends in add-on medications following metformin monotherapy for type 2 diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Trends in add-on medications following metformin monotherapy for type 2 diabetes
title_short Trends in add-on medications following metformin monotherapy for type 2 diabetes
title_sort trends in add-on medications following metformin monotherapy for type 2 diabetes
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36282929
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.11.1253
work_keys_str_mv AT swartelizabethcs trendsinaddonmedicationsfollowingmetforminmonotherapyfortype2diabetes
AT neilsonlynnm trendsinaddonmedicationsfollowingmetforminmonotherapyfortype2diabetes
AT munshikiraatd trendsinaddonmedicationsfollowingmetforminmonotherapyfortype2diabetes
AT peasahsamuelk trendsinaddonmedicationsfollowingmetforminmonotherapyfortype2diabetes
AT hendersonrochelle trendsinaddonmedicationsfollowingmetforminmonotherapyfortype2diabetes
AT goodchesterb trendsinaddonmedicationsfollowingmetforminmonotherapyfortype2diabetes