Health care resource utilization and costs associated with atrial fibrillation and rural-urban disparities

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) imposes substantial health care and economic burden on health care systems and patients. Previous studies failed to examine health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs among patients with incident AF and potential disparity with regard to geographic location. OBJECTIVES: To examine HCRU and costs among patients with incident AF compared with patients without AF and examine whether a geographic disparity exists. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. We selected patients with AF and patients without AF from IBM/Watson MarketScan Research Databases 2014-2019. HCRU and costs were collected 12 months following an AF index date. We used 2-part models with bootstrapping to obtain the marginal estimates and CIs. Rural status was identified based on Metropolitan Statistical Area. We adjusted for age, sex, plan type, US region, and comorbidities. RESULTS: Among 156,732 patients with AF and 3,398,490 patients without AF, patients with AF had 9.04 (95% CI = 8.96-9.12) more outpatient visits, 0.82 (95% CI = 0.81-0.83) more emergency department (ED) visits, 0.33 (95% CI = 0.33-0.34) more inpatient admission, and $15,095 (95% CI = 14,871-15,324) higher total costs, compared with patients without AF. Among patients with AF, rural patients had 1.99 fewer (95% CI = −2.26 to −1.71) outpatient visits and 0.05 (95% CI = 0.02-0.08) more ED visits than urban patients. Overall, rural patients with AF had decreased total costs compared with urban patients (mean = $751; 95% CI = −1,227 to −228). CONCLUSIONS: Incident AF was associated with substantial burden of health care resources and an economic burden, and the burden was not equally distributed across patients in urban vs rural settings.