Cargando…
Burden of illness in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease
BACKGROUND: Progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a relatively new clinical concept describing a variety of ILDs characterized by progressive pulmonary fibrosis with associated lung function decline and worsening chest imaging. Little is known about health care resource utilizatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35876293 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.8.871 |
_version_ | 1785078479938650112 |
---|---|
author | Singer, David Bengtson, Lindsay G S Conoscenti, Craig S Anderson, Amy J Brekke, Lee Shetty, Sharash S Brown, Kevin K |
author_facet | Singer, David Bengtson, Lindsay G S Conoscenti, Craig S Anderson, Amy J Brekke, Lee Shetty, Sharash S Brown, Kevin K |
author_sort | Singer, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a relatively new clinical concept describing a variety of ILDs characterized by progressive pulmonary fibrosis with associated lung function decline and worsening chest imaging. Little is known about health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs associated with progressive fibrosing ILDs other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). This study analyzed the adjusted HCRU and cost burden among patients with incident non-IPF progressive fibrosing ILD vs matched patients with incident fibrosing ILD that had not yet progressed. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of insured US adults newly diagnosed with non-IPF fibrosing ILD from October 2016 to June 2019, conducted using administrative claims data from the Optum Research Database. Progressive disease was identified using claims-based proxies comprising health care utilization associated with management of progressive fibrosing ILD. Patients in the progressive population were 1:1 propensity score matched to not-yet-progressed patients on the basis of baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. All-cause HCRU and health care costs were presented as weighted per-patient-per-month (PPPM) measures to account for variable follow-up. Differences in study outcomes between matched cohorts were evaluated using Z-tests for continuous measures and Rao-Scott tests for binary measures. RESULTS: The postmatch cohorts comprised 11,025 patients with evidence of progression matched to 11,025 patients with not-yet-progressed fibrosing ILD. Mean (SD) weighted PPPM counts of follow-up health care encounters were significantly higher for the progressive vs not-yet-progressed cohort: ambulatory visits, 4.2 (3.6) vs 3.1 (3.3); emergency department visits, 0.3 (0.5) vs 0.1 (0.3); and inpatient (IP) stays, 0.1 (0.2) vs 0.0 (0.1) (P < 0.001 for all). Among patients with an IP stay, those with progressive disease had more inpatient days than those with not-yet-progressed disease (mean [SD] 1.6 [2.4] days vs 1.0 [1.3] days, P < 0.001). Mean weighted PPPM (SD) all-cause health care costs were also significantly higher for progressive vs not-yet-progressed patients, including total costs ($4,382 [$9,597] vs $2,243 [$4,162], P < 0.001), medical costs ($3,662 [$9,150] vs $1,627 [$3,524], P < 0.001), and pharmacy costs ($720 [$2,097] vs $616 [$2,070], P = 0.002). The difference in medical costs between cohorts was driven primarily by higher inpatient costs for progressive vs not-yet-progressed patients ($1,729 [$7,557] vs $523 [$2,118], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Progressive fibrosing ILD carries a substantial economic and health care burden. Among patients with incident non-IPF fibrosing ILD, all-cause HCRU and costs were significantly higher for those with a progressive phenotype than for matched patients whose disease had not yet progressed. The cost differential was driven primarily by hospitalizations, which were longer and more frequent for the progressive cohort. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10373037 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103730372023-07-31 Burden of illness in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease Singer, David Bengtson, Lindsay G S Conoscenti, Craig S Anderson, Amy J Brekke, Lee Shetty, Sharash S Brown, Kevin K J Manag Care Spec Pharm Research BACKGROUND: Progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a relatively new clinical concept describing a variety of ILDs characterized by progressive pulmonary fibrosis with associated lung function decline and worsening chest imaging. Little is known about health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs associated with progressive fibrosing ILDs other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). This study analyzed the adjusted HCRU and cost burden among patients with incident non-IPF progressive fibrosing ILD vs matched patients with incident fibrosing ILD that had not yet progressed. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of insured US adults newly diagnosed with non-IPF fibrosing ILD from October 2016 to June 2019, conducted using administrative claims data from the Optum Research Database. Progressive disease was identified using claims-based proxies comprising health care utilization associated with management of progressive fibrosing ILD. Patients in the progressive population were 1:1 propensity score matched to not-yet-progressed patients on the basis of baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. All-cause HCRU and health care costs were presented as weighted per-patient-per-month (PPPM) measures to account for variable follow-up. Differences in study outcomes between matched cohorts were evaluated using Z-tests for continuous measures and Rao-Scott tests for binary measures. RESULTS: The postmatch cohorts comprised 11,025 patients with evidence of progression matched to 11,025 patients with not-yet-progressed fibrosing ILD. Mean (SD) weighted PPPM counts of follow-up health care encounters were significantly higher for the progressive vs not-yet-progressed cohort: ambulatory visits, 4.2 (3.6) vs 3.1 (3.3); emergency department visits, 0.3 (0.5) vs 0.1 (0.3); and inpatient (IP) stays, 0.1 (0.2) vs 0.0 (0.1) (P < 0.001 for all). Among patients with an IP stay, those with progressive disease had more inpatient days than those with not-yet-progressed disease (mean [SD] 1.6 [2.4] days vs 1.0 [1.3] days, P < 0.001). Mean weighted PPPM (SD) all-cause health care costs were also significantly higher for progressive vs not-yet-progressed patients, including total costs ($4,382 [$9,597] vs $2,243 [$4,162], P < 0.001), medical costs ($3,662 [$9,150] vs $1,627 [$3,524], P < 0.001), and pharmacy costs ($720 [$2,097] vs $616 [$2,070], P = 0.002). The difference in medical costs between cohorts was driven primarily by higher inpatient costs for progressive vs not-yet-progressed patients ($1,729 [$7,557] vs $523 [$2,118], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Progressive fibrosing ILD carries a substantial economic and health care burden. Among patients with incident non-IPF fibrosing ILD, all-cause HCRU and costs were significantly higher for those with a progressive phenotype than for matched patients whose disease had not yet progressed. The cost differential was driven primarily by hospitalizations, which were longer and more frequent for the progressive cohort. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10373037/ /pubmed/35876293 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.8.871 Text en Copyright © 2022, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Singer, David Bengtson, Lindsay G S Conoscenti, Craig S Anderson, Amy J Brekke, Lee Shetty, Sharash S Brown, Kevin K Burden of illness in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease |
title | Burden of illness in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease |
title_full | Burden of illness in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease |
title_fullStr | Burden of illness in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Burden of illness in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease |
title_short | Burden of illness in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease |
title_sort | burden of illness in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35876293 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.8.871 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singerdavid burdenofillnessinprogressivefibrosinginterstitiallungdisease AT bengtsonlindsaygs burdenofillnessinprogressivefibrosinginterstitiallungdisease AT conoscenticraigs burdenofillnessinprogressivefibrosinginterstitiallungdisease AT andersonamyj burdenofillnessinprogressivefibrosinginterstitiallungdisease AT brekkelee burdenofillnessinprogressivefibrosinginterstitiallungdisease AT shettysharashs burdenofillnessinprogressivefibrosinginterstitiallungdisease AT brownkevink burdenofillnessinprogressivefibrosinginterstitiallungdisease |