Cargando…

Burden of illness in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND: Progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a relatively new clinical concept describing a variety of ILDs characterized by progressive pulmonary fibrosis with associated lung function decline and worsening chest imaging. Little is known about health care resource utilizatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singer, David, Bengtson, Lindsay G S, Conoscenti, Craig S, Anderson, Amy J, Brekke, Lee, Shetty, Sharash S, Brown, Kevin K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35876293
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.8.871
_version_ 1785078479938650112
author Singer, David
Bengtson, Lindsay G S
Conoscenti, Craig S
Anderson, Amy J
Brekke, Lee
Shetty, Sharash S
Brown, Kevin K
author_facet Singer, David
Bengtson, Lindsay G S
Conoscenti, Craig S
Anderson, Amy J
Brekke, Lee
Shetty, Sharash S
Brown, Kevin K
author_sort Singer, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a relatively new clinical concept describing a variety of ILDs characterized by progressive pulmonary fibrosis with associated lung function decline and worsening chest imaging. Little is known about health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs associated with progressive fibrosing ILDs other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). This study analyzed the adjusted HCRU and cost burden among patients with incident non-IPF progressive fibrosing ILD vs matched patients with incident fibrosing ILD that had not yet progressed. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of insured US adults newly diagnosed with non-IPF fibrosing ILD from October 2016 to June 2019, conducted using administrative claims data from the Optum Research Database. Progressive disease was identified using claims-based proxies comprising health care utilization associated with management of progressive fibrosing ILD. Patients in the progressive population were 1:1 propensity score matched to not-yet-progressed patients on the basis of baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. All-cause HCRU and health care costs were presented as weighted per-patient-per-month (PPPM) measures to account for variable follow-up. Differences in study outcomes between matched cohorts were evaluated using Z-tests for continuous measures and Rao-Scott tests for binary measures. RESULTS: The postmatch cohorts comprised 11,025 patients with evidence of progression matched to 11,025 patients with not-yet-progressed fibrosing ILD. Mean (SD) weighted PPPM counts of follow-up health care encounters were significantly higher for the progressive vs not-yet-progressed cohort: ambulatory visits, 4.2 (3.6) vs 3.1 (3.3); emergency department visits, 0.3 (0.5) vs 0.1 (0.3); and inpatient (IP) stays, 0.1 (0.2) vs 0.0 (0.1) (P < 0.001 for all). Among patients with an IP stay, those with progressive disease had more inpatient days than those with not-yet-progressed disease (mean [SD] 1.6 [2.4] days vs 1.0 [1.3] days, P < 0.001). Mean weighted PPPM (SD) all-cause health care costs were also significantly higher for progressive vs not-yet-progressed patients, including total costs ($4,382 [$9,597] vs $2,243 [$4,162], P < 0.001), medical costs ($3,662 [$9,150] vs $1,627 [$3,524], P < 0.001), and pharmacy costs ($720 [$2,097] vs $616 [$2,070], P = 0.002). The difference in medical costs between cohorts was driven primarily by higher inpatient costs for progressive vs not-yet-progressed patients ($1,729 [$7,557] vs $523 [$2,118], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Progressive fibrosing ILD carries a substantial economic and health care burden. Among patients with incident non-IPF fibrosing ILD, all-cause HCRU and costs were significantly higher for those with a progressive phenotype than for matched patients whose disease had not yet progressed. The cost differential was driven primarily by hospitalizations, which were longer and more frequent for the progressive cohort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10373037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103730372023-07-31 Burden of illness in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease Singer, David Bengtson, Lindsay G S Conoscenti, Craig S Anderson, Amy J Brekke, Lee Shetty, Sharash S Brown, Kevin K J Manag Care Spec Pharm Research BACKGROUND: Progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a relatively new clinical concept describing a variety of ILDs characterized by progressive pulmonary fibrosis with associated lung function decline and worsening chest imaging. Little is known about health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs associated with progressive fibrosing ILDs other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). This study analyzed the adjusted HCRU and cost burden among patients with incident non-IPF progressive fibrosing ILD vs matched patients with incident fibrosing ILD that had not yet progressed. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of insured US adults newly diagnosed with non-IPF fibrosing ILD from October 2016 to June 2019, conducted using administrative claims data from the Optum Research Database. Progressive disease was identified using claims-based proxies comprising health care utilization associated with management of progressive fibrosing ILD. Patients in the progressive population were 1:1 propensity score matched to not-yet-progressed patients on the basis of baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. All-cause HCRU and health care costs were presented as weighted per-patient-per-month (PPPM) measures to account for variable follow-up. Differences in study outcomes between matched cohorts were evaluated using Z-tests for continuous measures and Rao-Scott tests for binary measures. RESULTS: The postmatch cohorts comprised 11,025 patients with evidence of progression matched to 11,025 patients with not-yet-progressed fibrosing ILD. Mean (SD) weighted PPPM counts of follow-up health care encounters were significantly higher for the progressive vs not-yet-progressed cohort: ambulatory visits, 4.2 (3.6) vs 3.1 (3.3); emergency department visits, 0.3 (0.5) vs 0.1 (0.3); and inpatient (IP) stays, 0.1 (0.2) vs 0.0 (0.1) (P < 0.001 for all). Among patients with an IP stay, those with progressive disease had more inpatient days than those with not-yet-progressed disease (mean [SD] 1.6 [2.4] days vs 1.0 [1.3] days, P < 0.001). Mean weighted PPPM (SD) all-cause health care costs were also significantly higher for progressive vs not-yet-progressed patients, including total costs ($4,382 [$9,597] vs $2,243 [$4,162], P < 0.001), medical costs ($3,662 [$9,150] vs $1,627 [$3,524], P < 0.001), and pharmacy costs ($720 [$2,097] vs $616 [$2,070], P = 0.002). The difference in medical costs between cohorts was driven primarily by higher inpatient costs for progressive vs not-yet-progressed patients ($1,729 [$7,557] vs $523 [$2,118], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Progressive fibrosing ILD carries a substantial economic and health care burden. Among patients with incident non-IPF fibrosing ILD, all-cause HCRU and costs were significantly higher for those with a progressive phenotype than for matched patients whose disease had not yet progressed. The cost differential was driven primarily by hospitalizations, which were longer and more frequent for the progressive cohort. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10373037/ /pubmed/35876293 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.8.871 Text en Copyright © 2022, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research
Singer, David
Bengtson, Lindsay G S
Conoscenti, Craig S
Anderson, Amy J
Brekke, Lee
Shetty, Sharash S
Brown, Kevin K
Burden of illness in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease
title Burden of illness in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease
title_full Burden of illness in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease
title_fullStr Burden of illness in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease
title_full_unstemmed Burden of illness in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease
title_short Burden of illness in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease
title_sort burden of illness in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35876293
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.8.871
work_keys_str_mv AT singerdavid burdenofillnessinprogressivefibrosinginterstitiallungdisease
AT bengtsonlindsaygs burdenofillnessinprogressivefibrosinginterstitiallungdisease
AT conoscenticraigs burdenofillnessinprogressivefibrosinginterstitiallungdisease
AT andersonamyj burdenofillnessinprogressivefibrosinginterstitiallungdisease
AT brekkelee burdenofillnessinprogressivefibrosinginterstitiallungdisease
AT shettysharashs burdenofillnessinprogressivefibrosinginterstitiallungdisease
AT brownkevink burdenofillnessinprogressivefibrosinginterstitiallungdisease