Cargando…

Analysis of a panel-based pharmacogenomics testing program among members of a commercial and Medicare client of a pharmacy benefits manager

BACKGROUND: Although the field of pharmacogenomics (PGx) has existed for decades, use of pharmacogenomic information by providers to optimize medication therapy for patients has had relatively slow adoption. There are many factors that have contributed to the slow adoption of PGx testing, but it is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steinbach, Musetta, Wickizer, Marleen, Siwak, Agata, Patel, Tina, Olson, Julie, Horowitz, Suzanne, Topp, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35332788
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.4.485
_version_ 1785078480431480832
author Steinbach, Musetta
Wickizer, Marleen
Siwak, Agata
Patel, Tina
Olson, Julie
Horowitz, Suzanne
Topp, Robert
author_facet Steinbach, Musetta
Wickizer, Marleen
Siwak, Agata
Patel, Tina
Olson, Julie
Horowitz, Suzanne
Topp, Robert
author_sort Steinbach, Musetta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although the field of pharmacogenomics (PGx) has existed for decades, use of pharmacogenomic information by providers to optimize medication therapy for patients has had relatively slow adoption. There are many factors that have contributed to the slow adoption of PGx testing, but it is partially due to a lack of coverage by payers. If PGx testing is covered by payers, frequently only testing of a specific gene is covered, rather than a panel of many genes. As a result, little is known about how coverage of a panel-based PGx test will affect a member’s medication therapy. OBJECTIVES: To determine how giving providers specific medication optimization recommendations, based on results of a panel-based PGx test, impacted members’ medication regimens. METHODS: Pharmacy claims data were retrospectively reviewed for this exploratory study. Members who participated in PGx testing were in the intervention group and members who chose not to participate in the PGx testing, but who were eligible to participate, were in the control group. PGx test results, including suggested medication changes, were mailed to providers. To determine if providers adopted the suggested medication changes, pharmacy claims data were analyzed retrospectively for the 4-month period preceding and following the date from which recommendations were provided to prescribers. RESULTS: Of the 101 members included in the analysis, 50 were in the intervention group and 51 were in the control group. In the intervention group, members were taking in a total of 352 medications; 165 of the medications had PGx guidance. Based on the PGx test results, 62 of these medications (37.6%) had recommendations. Of members who received PGx testing, 76% had at least 1 recommended change. When pharmacist recommendations were made, a change was made to the medication 27% of the time. There was a statistically significant difference between the number of medication changes in the PGx group and the control group (P = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations based on PGx testing can lead to changes in medications and an optimized medication regimen for members.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10373039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103730392023-07-31 Analysis of a panel-based pharmacogenomics testing program among members of a commercial and Medicare client of a pharmacy benefits manager Steinbach, Musetta Wickizer, Marleen Siwak, Agata Patel, Tina Olson, Julie Horowitz, Suzanne Topp, Robert J Manag Care Spec Pharm Research Brief BACKGROUND: Although the field of pharmacogenomics (PGx) has existed for decades, use of pharmacogenomic information by providers to optimize medication therapy for patients has had relatively slow adoption. There are many factors that have contributed to the slow adoption of PGx testing, but it is partially due to a lack of coverage by payers. If PGx testing is covered by payers, frequently only testing of a specific gene is covered, rather than a panel of many genes. As a result, little is known about how coverage of a panel-based PGx test will affect a member’s medication therapy. OBJECTIVES: To determine how giving providers specific medication optimization recommendations, based on results of a panel-based PGx test, impacted members’ medication regimens. METHODS: Pharmacy claims data were retrospectively reviewed for this exploratory study. Members who participated in PGx testing were in the intervention group and members who chose not to participate in the PGx testing, but who were eligible to participate, were in the control group. PGx test results, including suggested medication changes, were mailed to providers. To determine if providers adopted the suggested medication changes, pharmacy claims data were analyzed retrospectively for the 4-month period preceding and following the date from which recommendations were provided to prescribers. RESULTS: Of the 101 members included in the analysis, 50 were in the intervention group and 51 were in the control group. In the intervention group, members were taking in a total of 352 medications; 165 of the medications had PGx guidance. Based on the PGx test results, 62 of these medications (37.6%) had recommendations. Of members who received PGx testing, 76% had at least 1 recommended change. When pharmacist recommendations were made, a change was made to the medication 27% of the time. There was a statistically significant difference between the number of medication changes in the PGx group and the control group (P = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations based on PGx testing can lead to changes in medications and an optimized medication regimen for members. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10373039/ /pubmed/35332788 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.4.485 Text en Copyright © 2022, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Brief
Steinbach, Musetta
Wickizer, Marleen
Siwak, Agata
Patel, Tina
Olson, Julie
Horowitz, Suzanne
Topp, Robert
Analysis of a panel-based pharmacogenomics testing program among members of a commercial and Medicare client of a pharmacy benefits manager
title Analysis of a panel-based pharmacogenomics testing program among members of a commercial and Medicare client of a pharmacy benefits manager
title_full Analysis of a panel-based pharmacogenomics testing program among members of a commercial and Medicare client of a pharmacy benefits manager
title_fullStr Analysis of a panel-based pharmacogenomics testing program among members of a commercial and Medicare client of a pharmacy benefits manager
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of a panel-based pharmacogenomics testing program among members of a commercial and Medicare client of a pharmacy benefits manager
title_short Analysis of a panel-based pharmacogenomics testing program among members of a commercial and Medicare client of a pharmacy benefits manager
title_sort analysis of a panel-based pharmacogenomics testing program among members of a commercial and medicare client of a pharmacy benefits manager
topic Research Brief
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35332788
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.4.485
work_keys_str_mv AT steinbachmusetta analysisofapanelbasedpharmacogenomicstestingprogramamongmembersofacommercialandmedicareclientofapharmacybenefitsmanager
AT wickizermarleen analysisofapanelbasedpharmacogenomicstestingprogramamongmembersofacommercialandmedicareclientofapharmacybenefitsmanager
AT siwakagata analysisofapanelbasedpharmacogenomicstestingprogramamongmembersofacommercialandmedicareclientofapharmacybenefitsmanager
AT pateltina analysisofapanelbasedpharmacogenomicstestingprogramamongmembersofacommercialandmedicareclientofapharmacybenefitsmanager
AT olsonjulie analysisofapanelbasedpharmacogenomicstestingprogramamongmembersofacommercialandmedicareclientofapharmacybenefitsmanager
AT horowitzsuzanne analysisofapanelbasedpharmacogenomicstestingprogramamongmembersofacommercialandmedicareclientofapharmacybenefitsmanager
AT topprobert analysisofapanelbasedpharmacogenomicstestingprogramamongmembersofacommercialandmedicareclientofapharmacybenefitsmanager