Cargando…
Analysis of a panel-based pharmacogenomics testing program among members of a commercial and Medicare client of a pharmacy benefits manager
BACKGROUND: Although the field of pharmacogenomics (PGx) has existed for decades, use of pharmacogenomic information by providers to optimize medication therapy for patients has had relatively slow adoption. There are many factors that have contributed to the slow adoption of PGx testing, but it is...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35332788 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.4.485 |
_version_ | 1785078480431480832 |
---|---|
author | Steinbach, Musetta Wickizer, Marleen Siwak, Agata Patel, Tina Olson, Julie Horowitz, Suzanne Topp, Robert |
author_facet | Steinbach, Musetta Wickizer, Marleen Siwak, Agata Patel, Tina Olson, Julie Horowitz, Suzanne Topp, Robert |
author_sort | Steinbach, Musetta |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although the field of pharmacogenomics (PGx) has existed for decades, use of pharmacogenomic information by providers to optimize medication therapy for patients has had relatively slow adoption. There are many factors that have contributed to the slow adoption of PGx testing, but it is partially due to a lack of coverage by payers. If PGx testing is covered by payers, frequently only testing of a specific gene is covered, rather than a panel of many genes. As a result, little is known about how coverage of a panel-based PGx test will affect a member’s medication therapy. OBJECTIVES: To determine how giving providers specific medication optimization recommendations, based on results of a panel-based PGx test, impacted members’ medication regimens. METHODS: Pharmacy claims data were retrospectively reviewed for this exploratory study. Members who participated in PGx testing were in the intervention group and members who chose not to participate in the PGx testing, but who were eligible to participate, were in the control group. PGx test results, including suggested medication changes, were mailed to providers. To determine if providers adopted the suggested medication changes, pharmacy claims data were analyzed retrospectively for the 4-month period preceding and following the date from which recommendations were provided to prescribers. RESULTS: Of the 101 members included in the analysis, 50 were in the intervention group and 51 were in the control group. In the intervention group, members were taking in a total of 352 medications; 165 of the medications had PGx guidance. Based on the PGx test results, 62 of these medications (37.6%) had recommendations. Of members who received PGx testing, 76% had at least 1 recommended change. When pharmacist recommendations were made, a change was made to the medication 27% of the time. There was a statistically significant difference between the number of medication changes in the PGx group and the control group (P = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations based on PGx testing can lead to changes in medications and an optimized medication regimen for members. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10373039 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103730392023-07-31 Analysis of a panel-based pharmacogenomics testing program among members of a commercial and Medicare client of a pharmacy benefits manager Steinbach, Musetta Wickizer, Marleen Siwak, Agata Patel, Tina Olson, Julie Horowitz, Suzanne Topp, Robert J Manag Care Spec Pharm Research Brief BACKGROUND: Although the field of pharmacogenomics (PGx) has existed for decades, use of pharmacogenomic information by providers to optimize medication therapy for patients has had relatively slow adoption. There are many factors that have contributed to the slow adoption of PGx testing, but it is partially due to a lack of coverage by payers. If PGx testing is covered by payers, frequently only testing of a specific gene is covered, rather than a panel of many genes. As a result, little is known about how coverage of a panel-based PGx test will affect a member’s medication therapy. OBJECTIVES: To determine how giving providers specific medication optimization recommendations, based on results of a panel-based PGx test, impacted members’ medication regimens. METHODS: Pharmacy claims data were retrospectively reviewed for this exploratory study. Members who participated in PGx testing were in the intervention group and members who chose not to participate in the PGx testing, but who were eligible to participate, were in the control group. PGx test results, including suggested medication changes, were mailed to providers. To determine if providers adopted the suggested medication changes, pharmacy claims data were analyzed retrospectively for the 4-month period preceding and following the date from which recommendations were provided to prescribers. RESULTS: Of the 101 members included in the analysis, 50 were in the intervention group and 51 were in the control group. In the intervention group, members were taking in a total of 352 medications; 165 of the medications had PGx guidance. Based on the PGx test results, 62 of these medications (37.6%) had recommendations. Of members who received PGx testing, 76% had at least 1 recommended change. When pharmacist recommendations were made, a change was made to the medication 27% of the time. There was a statistically significant difference between the number of medication changes in the PGx group and the control group (P = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations based on PGx testing can lead to changes in medications and an optimized medication regimen for members. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10373039/ /pubmed/35332788 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.4.485 Text en Copyright © 2022, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Brief Steinbach, Musetta Wickizer, Marleen Siwak, Agata Patel, Tina Olson, Julie Horowitz, Suzanne Topp, Robert Analysis of a panel-based pharmacogenomics testing program among members of a commercial and Medicare client of a pharmacy benefits manager |
title | Analysis of a panel-based pharmacogenomics testing program among members of a commercial and Medicare client of a pharmacy benefits manager |
title_full | Analysis of a panel-based pharmacogenomics testing program among members of a commercial and Medicare client of a pharmacy benefits manager |
title_fullStr | Analysis of a panel-based pharmacogenomics testing program among members of a commercial and Medicare client of a pharmacy benefits manager |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of a panel-based pharmacogenomics testing program among members of a commercial and Medicare client of a pharmacy benefits manager |
title_short | Analysis of a panel-based pharmacogenomics testing program among members of a commercial and Medicare client of a pharmacy benefits manager |
title_sort | analysis of a panel-based pharmacogenomics testing program among members of a commercial and medicare client of a pharmacy benefits manager |
topic | Research Brief |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35332788 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.4.485 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steinbachmusetta analysisofapanelbasedpharmacogenomicstestingprogramamongmembersofacommercialandmedicareclientofapharmacybenefitsmanager AT wickizermarleen analysisofapanelbasedpharmacogenomicstestingprogramamongmembersofacommercialandmedicareclientofapharmacybenefitsmanager AT siwakagata analysisofapanelbasedpharmacogenomicstestingprogramamongmembersofacommercialandmedicareclientofapharmacybenefitsmanager AT pateltina analysisofapanelbasedpharmacogenomicstestingprogramamongmembersofacommercialandmedicareclientofapharmacybenefitsmanager AT olsonjulie analysisofapanelbasedpharmacogenomicstestingprogramamongmembersofacommercialandmedicareclientofapharmacybenefitsmanager AT horowitzsuzanne analysisofapanelbasedpharmacogenomicstestingprogramamongmembersofacommercialandmedicareclientofapharmacybenefitsmanager AT topprobert analysisofapanelbasedpharmacogenomicstestingprogramamongmembersofacommercialandmedicareclientofapharmacybenefitsmanager |