Cargando…

Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements for devices and diagnostics in the United States: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Performance-based risksharing arrangements (PBRSAs) have continued to emerge and evolve over the last 2 decades. To date, most of the attention and available literature have focused on pharmaceuticals. OBJECTIVE: To assess the current status and trends regarding the use of PBRSAs for dia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yilin, Carlson, Josh J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34949115
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.1.78
_version_ 1785078482453135360
author Chen, Yilin
Carlson, Josh J
author_facet Chen, Yilin
Carlson, Josh J
author_sort Chen, Yilin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Performance-based risksharing arrangements (PBRSAs) have continued to emerge and evolve over the last 2 decades. To date, most of the attention and available literature have focused on pharmaceuticals. OBJECTIVE: To assess the current status and trends regarding the use of PBRSAs for diagnostics and devices in the United States. METHODS: We reviewed publicly available PBRSAs for diagnostics and devices using the University of Washington Performance Based Risk Sharing Database. We augmented the review using PubMed, Google, and payer and industry websites. Key words and phrases such as outcomes-based, value-based, coverage with evidence development, performance-based, and risk-sharing were used in combination with device or diagnostic. To characterize arrangements in terms of product and market attributes, we extracted data for each product, including arrangement descriptions, arrangement type, year, therapeutic area, product manufacturer, payer, and product type. Arrangements were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Fifty-two arrangements were identified between the years 2001 and 2019, with 30 (57.7%) for devices and 22 (42.3%) for diagnostic tests. Among these, 23 (44.2%) were coverage with evidence development (CED), only in research; 17 (32.7%) were performance-linked reimbursement (PLR); and 12 (23.1%) were CED, only with research. The majority of arrangements for devices were developed in cardiology (12, 40%), endocrinology (4, 13.3%), and radiology (3, 10%). Most of arrangements for identified diagnostic tests were in oncology (17, 77.3%). Over time, there has been a trend towards increasing adoption of PLR and CED, only with research, especially since 2014. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to comprehensively review PBRSA arrangements for diagnostics and devices in the United States. Our findings demonstrated that there is substantial PBRSA activity for devices and diagnostics, and the pace of PBRSA adoption appears to be increasing in terms of frequency and variety. These arrangements have implications for managed care into the future as the health care system shifts towards value-based care and value-based pricing to contain cost for payers and ensure value in the patient populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10373047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103730472023-07-31 Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements for devices and diagnostics in the United States: a systematic review Chen, Yilin Carlson, Josh J J Manag Care Spec Pharm Research Brief BACKGROUND: Performance-based risksharing arrangements (PBRSAs) have continued to emerge and evolve over the last 2 decades. To date, most of the attention and available literature have focused on pharmaceuticals. OBJECTIVE: To assess the current status and trends regarding the use of PBRSAs for diagnostics and devices in the United States. METHODS: We reviewed publicly available PBRSAs for diagnostics and devices using the University of Washington Performance Based Risk Sharing Database. We augmented the review using PubMed, Google, and payer and industry websites. Key words and phrases such as outcomes-based, value-based, coverage with evidence development, performance-based, and risk-sharing were used in combination with device or diagnostic. To characterize arrangements in terms of product and market attributes, we extracted data for each product, including arrangement descriptions, arrangement type, year, therapeutic area, product manufacturer, payer, and product type. Arrangements were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Fifty-two arrangements were identified between the years 2001 and 2019, with 30 (57.7%) for devices and 22 (42.3%) for diagnostic tests. Among these, 23 (44.2%) were coverage with evidence development (CED), only in research; 17 (32.7%) were performance-linked reimbursement (PLR); and 12 (23.1%) were CED, only with research. The majority of arrangements for devices were developed in cardiology (12, 40%), endocrinology (4, 13.3%), and radiology (3, 10%). Most of arrangements for identified diagnostic tests were in oncology (17, 77.3%). Over time, there has been a trend towards increasing adoption of PLR and CED, only with research, especially since 2014. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to comprehensively review PBRSA arrangements for diagnostics and devices in the United States. Our findings demonstrated that there is substantial PBRSA activity for devices and diagnostics, and the pace of PBRSA adoption appears to be increasing in terms of frequency and variety. These arrangements have implications for managed care into the future as the health care system shifts towards value-based care and value-based pricing to contain cost for payers and ensure value in the patient populations. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10373047/ /pubmed/34949115 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.1.78 Text en Copyright © 2022, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Brief
Chen, Yilin
Carlson, Josh J
Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements for devices and diagnostics in the United States: a systematic review
title Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements for devices and diagnostics in the United States: a systematic review
title_full Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements for devices and diagnostics in the United States: a systematic review
title_fullStr Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements for devices and diagnostics in the United States: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements for devices and diagnostics in the United States: a systematic review
title_short Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements for devices and diagnostics in the United States: a systematic review
title_sort performance-based risk-sharing arrangements for devices and diagnostics in the united states: a systematic review
topic Research Brief
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34949115
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.1.78
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyilin performancebasedrisksharingarrangementsfordevicesanddiagnosticsintheunitedstatesasystematicreview
AT carlsonjoshj performancebasedrisksharingarrangementsfordevicesanddiagnosticsintheunitedstatesasystematicreview