Cargando…

Re‐evaluation of calcium carbonate (E 170) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groups

Calcium carbonate (E 170) was re‐evaluated in 2011 by the former EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). As a follow‐up to this assessment, the Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to assess the safety of calcium carbonate (E 170) for its uses as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Younes, Maged, Aquilina, Gabriele, Castle, Laurence, Degen, Gisela, Engel, Karl‐Heinz, Fowler, Paul J, Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose, Fürst, Peter, Gürtler, Rainer, Husøy, Trine, Manco, Melania, Mennes, Wim, Moldeus, Peter, Passamonti, Sabina, Shah, Romina, Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine, Wright, Matthew, Wölfle, Detlef, Dusemund, Birgit, Mortensen, Alicja, Turck, Dominique, Cheyns, Karlien, Gaffet, Eric, Loeschner, Katrin, Mast, Jan, Mirat, Manuela, Undas, Anna, Barmaz, Stefania, Mech, Agnieszka, Rincon, Ana Maria, Smeraldi, Camilla, Tard, Alexandra, Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37522100
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8106
_version_ 1785078499454746624
author Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Degen, Gisela
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul J
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gürtler, Rainer
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Mennes, Wim
Moldeus, Peter
Passamonti, Sabina
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Wright, Matthew
Wölfle, Detlef
Dusemund, Birgit
Mortensen, Alicja
Turck, Dominique
Cheyns, Karlien
Gaffet, Eric
Loeschner, Katrin
Mast, Jan
Mirat, Manuela
Undas, Anna
Barmaz, Stefania
Mech, Agnieszka
Rincon, Ana Maria
Smeraldi, Camilla
Tard, Alexandra
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
author_facet Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Degen, Gisela
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul J
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gürtler, Rainer
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Mennes, Wim
Moldeus, Peter
Passamonti, Sabina
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Wright, Matthew
Wölfle, Detlef
Dusemund, Birgit
Mortensen, Alicja
Turck, Dominique
Cheyns, Karlien
Gaffet, Eric
Loeschner, Katrin
Mast, Jan
Mirat, Manuela
Undas, Anna
Barmaz, Stefania
Mech, Agnieszka
Rincon, Ana Maria
Smeraldi, Camilla
Tard, Alexandra
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
collection PubMed
description Calcium carbonate (E 170) was re‐evaluated in 2011 by the former EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). As a follow‐up to this assessment, the Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to assess the safety of calcium carbonate (E 170) for its uses as a food additive in food for infants below 16 weeks of age belonging to food category 13.1.5.1 (Dietary foods for infants for special medical purposes and special formulae for infants) and as carry over in line with Annex III, Part 5 Section B to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008. In addition, the FAF Panel was requested to address the issues already identified during the re‐evaluation of the food additive when used in food for the general population. The process involved the publication of a call for data to allow the interested business operators (IBOs) to provide the requested information to complete the risk assessment. The Panel concluded that there is no need for a numerical acceptable daily intake (ADI) for calcium carbonate and that, in principle, there are no safety concern with respect to the exposure to calcium carbonate per se at the currently reported uses and use levels in all age groups of the population, including infants below 16 weeks of age. With respect to the calcium intake resulting from the use of E 170 in food for the general population and infants < 16 weeks of age, the Panel concluded that it contributes only to a small part to the overall calcium dietary exposure. However, the unavoidable presence of aluminium in E 170 is of concern and should be addressed. In addition, the Panel concluded that the technical data provided by the IBO support further amendments of the specifications for E 170 laid down in Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10373136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103731362023-07-28 Re‐evaluation of calcium carbonate (E 170) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groups Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Degen, Gisela Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul J Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wright, Matthew Wölfle, Detlef Dusemund, Birgit Mortensen, Alicja Turck, Dominique Cheyns, Karlien Gaffet, Eric Loeschner, Katrin Mast, Jan Mirat, Manuela Undas, Anna Barmaz, Stefania Mech, Agnieszka Rincon, Ana Maria Smeraldi, Camilla Tard, Alexandra Gundert‐Remy, Ursula EFSA J Scientific Opinion Calcium carbonate (E 170) was re‐evaluated in 2011 by the former EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). As a follow‐up to this assessment, the Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to assess the safety of calcium carbonate (E 170) for its uses as a food additive in food for infants below 16 weeks of age belonging to food category 13.1.5.1 (Dietary foods for infants for special medical purposes and special formulae for infants) and as carry over in line with Annex III, Part 5 Section B to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008. In addition, the FAF Panel was requested to address the issues already identified during the re‐evaluation of the food additive when used in food for the general population. The process involved the publication of a call for data to allow the interested business operators (IBOs) to provide the requested information to complete the risk assessment. The Panel concluded that there is no need for a numerical acceptable daily intake (ADI) for calcium carbonate and that, in principle, there are no safety concern with respect to the exposure to calcium carbonate per se at the currently reported uses and use levels in all age groups of the population, including infants below 16 weeks of age. With respect to the calcium intake resulting from the use of E 170 in food for the general population and infants < 16 weeks of age, the Panel concluded that it contributes only to a small part to the overall calcium dietary exposure. However, the unavoidable presence of aluminium in E 170 is of concern and should be addressed. In addition, the Panel concluded that the technical data provided by the IBO support further amendments of the specifications for E 170 laid down in Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10373136/ /pubmed/37522100 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8106 Text en © 2023 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Degen, Gisela
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul J
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gürtler, Rainer
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Mennes, Wim
Moldeus, Peter
Passamonti, Sabina
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Wright, Matthew
Wölfle, Detlef
Dusemund, Birgit
Mortensen, Alicja
Turck, Dominique
Cheyns, Karlien
Gaffet, Eric
Loeschner, Katrin
Mast, Jan
Mirat, Manuela
Undas, Anna
Barmaz, Stefania
Mech, Agnieszka
Rincon, Ana Maria
Smeraldi, Camilla
Tard, Alexandra
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Re‐evaluation of calcium carbonate (E 170) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groups
title Re‐evaluation of calcium carbonate (E 170) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groups
title_full Re‐evaluation of calcium carbonate (E 170) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groups
title_fullStr Re‐evaluation of calcium carbonate (E 170) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groups
title_full_unstemmed Re‐evaluation of calcium carbonate (E 170) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groups
title_short Re‐evaluation of calcium carbonate (E 170) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groups
title_sort re‐evaluation of calcium carbonate (e 170) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as food additive for uses in foods for all population groups
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37522100
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8106
work_keys_str_mv AT reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT younesmaged reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT aquilinagabriele reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT castlelaurence reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT degengisela reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT engelkarlheinz reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT fowlerpaulj reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT frutosfernandezmariajose reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT furstpeter reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT gurtlerrainer reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT husøytrine reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT mancomelania reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT menneswim reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT moldeuspeter reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT passamontisabina reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT shahromina reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT waalkensberendsenine reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT wrightmatthew reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT wolfledetlef reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT dusemundbirgit reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT mortensenalicja reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT turckdominique reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT cheynskarlien reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT gaffeteric reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT loeschnerkatrin reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT mastjan reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT miratmanuela reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT undasanna reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT barmazstefania reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT mechagnieszka reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT rinconanamaria reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT smeraldicamilla reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT tardalexandra reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups
AT gundertremyursula reevaluationofcalciumcarbonatee170asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandfollowupofitsreevaluationasfoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups