Cargando…

Comparison of Thawing Treatments on Quality, Microbiota, and Organoleptic Characteristics of Chicken Meat Fillets

[Image: see text] The current research attempted to evaluate the impact of various thawing techniques (R(0): control group, R(1): water immersion thawing, R(2): low-temperature thawing, R(3): combined thawing, water thawing then low-temperature thawing, R(4): combination thawing, low temperature tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arshad, Muhammad Waqas, Tariq, Muhammad Rizwan, Ali, Shinawar Waseem, Basharat, Zunaira, Umer, Zujaja, Nayik, Gulzar Ahmad, Ramniwas, Seema, Aloufi, Abeer S., Alharbi, Sulaiman Ali, Ansari, Mohammad Javed, Ercisli, Sezai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37521673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03385
_version_ 1785078514816385024
author Arshad, Muhammad Waqas
Tariq, Muhammad Rizwan
Ali, Shinawar Waseem
Basharat, Zunaira
Umer, Zujaja
Nayik, Gulzar Ahmad
Ramniwas, Seema
Aloufi, Abeer S.
Alharbi, Sulaiman Ali
Ansari, Mohammad Javed
Ercisli, Sezai
author_facet Arshad, Muhammad Waqas
Tariq, Muhammad Rizwan
Ali, Shinawar Waseem
Basharat, Zunaira
Umer, Zujaja
Nayik, Gulzar Ahmad
Ramniwas, Seema
Aloufi, Abeer S.
Alharbi, Sulaiman Ali
Ansari, Mohammad Javed
Ercisli, Sezai
author_sort Arshad, Muhammad Waqas
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The current research attempted to evaluate the impact of various thawing techniques (R(0): control group, R(1): water immersion thawing, R(2): low-temperature thawing, R(3): combined thawing, water thawing then low-temperature thawing, R(4): combination thawing, low temperature thawing then water thawing, and R(5): oven thawing) on the quality, microbiota, and organoleptic characteristics of chicken meat fillets. The findings showed that moisture content varied from 74.43 to 72.33%; thawing loss peaked in R(1) at 4.66%, while it was minimum in R(5) at 2.10%. Lipid content varied from 1.09% in R(0) to 1.03% in R(5), while protein content varied from 22.06% in R(0) to 23.10% in R(1). The values of shear force, protein, and lipid oxidation increased for all treatments compared to control, ranging from 7.94 N to 9.54 N, 0.99–1.21 nm/mg protein, and 0.74–1.15 mg MDA/Kg, respectively. On the other hand, pH (5.94 in R(4)) and protein solubility (238.63 mg/g in R(1)) were decreased in contrast to the control group (6.08 and 298.27 mg/g). In association with different methods, R(5) and R(2) showed minimal thawing loss and the highest lipid and protein oxidation rates. However, R(3) showed reduced shear force and lipid oxidation comparatively. TPC was significantly (P < 0.05) increased in both R(2) and R(1). Sensory evaluation indicated that R(3) and R(2) showed better color and taste, while R(1) showed minimum scores for organoleptic attributes. R(0), R(3), and R(5) obtained a higher sensory score(,) whereas R(1), R(2), and R(4) showed a lower score. However, R(5) exhibited better results in close association with the control group (R(0)). Hence, it can be concluded that freezing and subsequent thawing decrease the quality of chicken fillets due to the time required for thawing. In the present study, the best quality of chicken fillets was retained by R(3) and R(5) due to their reduced thawing periods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10373201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103732012023-07-28 Comparison of Thawing Treatments on Quality, Microbiota, and Organoleptic Characteristics of Chicken Meat Fillets Arshad, Muhammad Waqas Tariq, Muhammad Rizwan Ali, Shinawar Waseem Basharat, Zunaira Umer, Zujaja Nayik, Gulzar Ahmad Ramniwas, Seema Aloufi, Abeer S. Alharbi, Sulaiman Ali Ansari, Mohammad Javed Ercisli, Sezai ACS Omega [Image: see text] The current research attempted to evaluate the impact of various thawing techniques (R(0): control group, R(1): water immersion thawing, R(2): low-temperature thawing, R(3): combined thawing, water thawing then low-temperature thawing, R(4): combination thawing, low temperature thawing then water thawing, and R(5): oven thawing) on the quality, microbiota, and organoleptic characteristics of chicken meat fillets. The findings showed that moisture content varied from 74.43 to 72.33%; thawing loss peaked in R(1) at 4.66%, while it was minimum in R(5) at 2.10%. Lipid content varied from 1.09% in R(0) to 1.03% in R(5), while protein content varied from 22.06% in R(0) to 23.10% in R(1). The values of shear force, protein, and lipid oxidation increased for all treatments compared to control, ranging from 7.94 N to 9.54 N, 0.99–1.21 nm/mg protein, and 0.74–1.15 mg MDA/Kg, respectively. On the other hand, pH (5.94 in R(4)) and protein solubility (238.63 mg/g in R(1)) were decreased in contrast to the control group (6.08 and 298.27 mg/g). In association with different methods, R(5) and R(2) showed minimal thawing loss and the highest lipid and protein oxidation rates. However, R(3) showed reduced shear force and lipid oxidation comparatively. TPC was significantly (P < 0.05) increased in both R(2) and R(1). Sensory evaluation indicated that R(3) and R(2) showed better color and taste, while R(1) showed minimum scores for organoleptic attributes. R(0), R(3), and R(5) obtained a higher sensory score(,) whereas R(1), R(2), and R(4) showed a lower score. However, R(5) exhibited better results in close association with the control group (R(0)). Hence, it can be concluded that freezing and subsequent thawing decrease the quality of chicken fillets due to the time required for thawing. In the present study, the best quality of chicken fillets was retained by R(3) and R(5) due to their reduced thawing periods. American Chemical Society 2023-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10373201/ /pubmed/37521673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03385 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Arshad, Muhammad Waqas
Tariq, Muhammad Rizwan
Ali, Shinawar Waseem
Basharat, Zunaira
Umer, Zujaja
Nayik, Gulzar Ahmad
Ramniwas, Seema
Aloufi, Abeer S.
Alharbi, Sulaiman Ali
Ansari, Mohammad Javed
Ercisli, Sezai
Comparison of Thawing Treatments on Quality, Microbiota, and Organoleptic Characteristics of Chicken Meat Fillets
title Comparison of Thawing Treatments on Quality, Microbiota, and Organoleptic Characteristics of Chicken Meat Fillets
title_full Comparison of Thawing Treatments on Quality, Microbiota, and Organoleptic Characteristics of Chicken Meat Fillets
title_fullStr Comparison of Thawing Treatments on Quality, Microbiota, and Organoleptic Characteristics of Chicken Meat Fillets
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Thawing Treatments on Quality, Microbiota, and Organoleptic Characteristics of Chicken Meat Fillets
title_short Comparison of Thawing Treatments on Quality, Microbiota, and Organoleptic Characteristics of Chicken Meat Fillets
title_sort comparison of thawing treatments on quality, microbiota, and organoleptic characteristics of chicken meat fillets
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37521673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03385
work_keys_str_mv AT arshadmuhammadwaqas comparisonofthawingtreatmentsonqualitymicrobiotaandorganolepticcharacteristicsofchickenmeatfillets
AT tariqmuhammadrizwan comparisonofthawingtreatmentsonqualitymicrobiotaandorganolepticcharacteristicsofchickenmeatfillets
AT alishinawarwaseem comparisonofthawingtreatmentsonqualitymicrobiotaandorganolepticcharacteristicsofchickenmeatfillets
AT basharatzunaira comparisonofthawingtreatmentsonqualitymicrobiotaandorganolepticcharacteristicsofchickenmeatfillets
AT umerzujaja comparisonofthawingtreatmentsonqualitymicrobiotaandorganolepticcharacteristicsofchickenmeatfillets
AT nayikgulzarahmad comparisonofthawingtreatmentsonqualitymicrobiotaandorganolepticcharacteristicsofchickenmeatfillets
AT ramniwasseema comparisonofthawingtreatmentsonqualitymicrobiotaandorganolepticcharacteristicsofchickenmeatfillets
AT aloufiabeers comparisonofthawingtreatmentsonqualitymicrobiotaandorganolepticcharacteristicsofchickenmeatfillets
AT alharbisulaimanali comparisonofthawingtreatmentsonqualitymicrobiotaandorganolepticcharacteristicsofchickenmeatfillets
AT ansarimohammadjaved comparisonofthawingtreatmentsonqualitymicrobiotaandorganolepticcharacteristicsofchickenmeatfillets
AT ercislisezai comparisonofthawingtreatmentsonqualitymicrobiotaandorganolepticcharacteristicsofchickenmeatfillets