Cargando…
Upper limb practice with a dynamic hand orthosis to improve arm and hand function in people after stroke: a feasibility study
BACKGROUND: Dynamic hand orthosis may help upper limb recovery by keeping the wrist and hand in an optimal position while executing a grasp. Our aim was to investigate the feasibility of combining a dynamic hand orthosis with task-oriented upper limb practice after stroke. METHOD: Fifteen adult stro...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373280/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37501217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01353-8 |
_version_ | 1785078533844893696 |
---|---|
author | Wong, Yih Ada, Louise Månum, Grethe Langhammer, Birgitta |
author_facet | Wong, Yih Ada, Louise Månum, Grethe Langhammer, Birgitta |
author_sort | Wong, Yih |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dynamic hand orthosis may help upper limb recovery by keeping the wrist and hand in an optimal position while executing a grasp. Our aim was to investigate the feasibility of combining a dynamic hand orthosis with task-oriented upper limb practice after stroke. METHOD: Fifteen adult stroke survivors were recruited in a single-group, pre-post intervention study. They received 12 weeks of task-oriented upper limb training with a dynamic hand orthosis with 3 weeks supervised at a community rehabilitation unit followed by 9 weeks unsupervised at home. Feasibility was determined by recruitment (proportion of eligible/enrolled and enrolled/retained participants), intervention (adherence, acceptability, and safety) and measurement (time taken to collect outcomes and proportion of participants where all measures were collected). Clinical outcomes were measured at baseline (Week 0), end of Week 3 and Week 12. RESULTS: Fifteen (46%) of eligible volunteers were enrolled in the study. Eight (53%) of those enrolled completed the 12-week intervention. Eighty eight percent were satisfied or very satisfied with the dynamic hand orthosis. Clinical measures were collected for all participants at baseline and in all those who completed the intervention but often took over one hour to complete. At 12 weeks, participants had improved by 7 points out of 57 (95% CI 2 to 13) on the ARAT and by 8 points out of 66 (95% CI 0 to 15) on the FMA-UE. CONCLUSION: The intervention appears to be feasible in terms of acceptability and safety, while recruitment and measurement need further consideration. The magnitude of the clinical outcomes suggests that the intervention has a potential to improve both upper limb activity and impairment, and this study provides useful information for the design of a pilot randomized trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03396939. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10373280 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103732802023-07-28 Upper limb practice with a dynamic hand orthosis to improve arm and hand function in people after stroke: a feasibility study Wong, Yih Ada, Louise Månum, Grethe Langhammer, Birgitta Pilot Feasibility Stud Research BACKGROUND: Dynamic hand orthosis may help upper limb recovery by keeping the wrist and hand in an optimal position while executing a grasp. Our aim was to investigate the feasibility of combining a dynamic hand orthosis with task-oriented upper limb practice after stroke. METHOD: Fifteen adult stroke survivors were recruited in a single-group, pre-post intervention study. They received 12 weeks of task-oriented upper limb training with a dynamic hand orthosis with 3 weeks supervised at a community rehabilitation unit followed by 9 weeks unsupervised at home. Feasibility was determined by recruitment (proportion of eligible/enrolled and enrolled/retained participants), intervention (adherence, acceptability, and safety) and measurement (time taken to collect outcomes and proportion of participants where all measures were collected). Clinical outcomes were measured at baseline (Week 0), end of Week 3 and Week 12. RESULTS: Fifteen (46%) of eligible volunteers were enrolled in the study. Eight (53%) of those enrolled completed the 12-week intervention. Eighty eight percent were satisfied or very satisfied with the dynamic hand orthosis. Clinical measures were collected for all participants at baseline and in all those who completed the intervention but often took over one hour to complete. At 12 weeks, participants had improved by 7 points out of 57 (95% CI 2 to 13) on the ARAT and by 8 points out of 66 (95% CI 0 to 15) on the FMA-UE. CONCLUSION: The intervention appears to be feasible in terms of acceptability and safety, while recruitment and measurement need further consideration. The magnitude of the clinical outcomes suggests that the intervention has a potential to improve both upper limb activity and impairment, and this study provides useful information for the design of a pilot randomized trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03396939. BioMed Central 2023-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10373280/ /pubmed/37501217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01353-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Wong, Yih Ada, Louise Månum, Grethe Langhammer, Birgitta Upper limb practice with a dynamic hand orthosis to improve arm and hand function in people after stroke: a feasibility study |
title | Upper limb practice with a dynamic hand orthosis to improve arm and hand function in people after stroke: a feasibility study |
title_full | Upper limb practice with a dynamic hand orthosis to improve arm and hand function in people after stroke: a feasibility study |
title_fullStr | Upper limb practice with a dynamic hand orthosis to improve arm and hand function in people after stroke: a feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | Upper limb practice with a dynamic hand orthosis to improve arm and hand function in people after stroke: a feasibility study |
title_short | Upper limb practice with a dynamic hand orthosis to improve arm and hand function in people after stroke: a feasibility study |
title_sort | upper limb practice with a dynamic hand orthosis to improve arm and hand function in people after stroke: a feasibility study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373280/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37501217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01353-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wongyih upperlimbpracticewithadynamichandorthosistoimprovearmandhandfunctioninpeopleafterstrokeafeasibilitystudy AT adalouise upperlimbpracticewithadynamichandorthosistoimprovearmandhandfunctioninpeopleafterstrokeafeasibilitystudy AT manumgrethe upperlimbpracticewithadynamichandorthosistoimprovearmandhandfunctioninpeopleafterstrokeafeasibilitystudy AT langhammerbirgitta upperlimbpracticewithadynamichandorthosistoimprovearmandhandfunctioninpeopleafterstrokeafeasibilitystudy |