Cargando…

Development and validation of pharmaceutical care barriers scale in Chinese hospitals: a cross-sectional survey

Introduction: Chinese hospitals still face various barriers to implementing pharmaceutical care. The quantitative instrument for measuring these barriers in China is scarce. This study aims to develop and validate a scale for measuring barriers to providing pharmaceutical care in Chinese hospitals f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Liangjiang, Yang, Nan, Huang, Yuankai, Xi, Xiaoyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37521472
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1194901
_version_ 1785078537442557952
author Chen, Liangjiang
Yang, Nan
Huang, Yuankai
Xi, Xiaoyu
author_facet Chen, Liangjiang
Yang, Nan
Huang, Yuankai
Xi, Xiaoyu
author_sort Chen, Liangjiang
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Chinese hospitals still face various barriers to implementing pharmaceutical care. The quantitative instrument for measuring these barriers in China is scarce. This study aims to develop and validate a scale for measuring barriers to providing pharmaceutical care in Chinese hospitals from the perspective of clinical pharmacists. Methods: The scale was developed based on existing literature and qualitative interviews with 20 experts. The scale was included in a small-range pilot survey and then administered to a validation survey in 31 provinces in China. Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify the structure of the scale. Confirmatory factor analysis was applied to verify the structure of the scale and to validate the scale’s convergent and discriminative validity. Known-group validity was also examined. Cronbach’s alpha examined the internal consistency reliability of the scale. Results: 292 scales were completed and returned for a response rate of 85.6% in the pilot study. Exploratory factor analysis of the scale suggested a five-factor solution (Cognition and attitude, Knowledge and skills, Objective conditions, External cooperation, and Support from managers) accounting for 66.03% of the total variance. 443 scales were sent out in the validation study, with a response rate of 81.0%. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a good fit of the structural model for pharmaceutical care barriers. It showed the scale’s good convergent and discriminative validity (The average variance extracted >0.5 and composite reliability >0.7). The scale could also identify the differences in total score among the clinical pharmacists from different hospital grades (p < 0.05). Cronbach’s alpha is between 0.658 and 0.896, indicating good internal consistency. Conclusion: From the perspective of clinical pharmacists, this study has developed a scale to assess obstacles to pharmaceutical care. The scale comprehensively encompasses barriers to clinical pharmacists’ cognitive and ability-related aspects, hindrances encountered in collaborating with other health professionals and patients, and barriers to the working environment. The reliability and validity have been established through verification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10373295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103732952023-07-28 Development and validation of pharmaceutical care barriers scale in Chinese hospitals: a cross-sectional survey Chen, Liangjiang Yang, Nan Huang, Yuankai Xi, Xiaoyu Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Introduction: Chinese hospitals still face various barriers to implementing pharmaceutical care. The quantitative instrument for measuring these barriers in China is scarce. This study aims to develop and validate a scale for measuring barriers to providing pharmaceutical care in Chinese hospitals from the perspective of clinical pharmacists. Methods: The scale was developed based on existing literature and qualitative interviews with 20 experts. The scale was included in a small-range pilot survey and then administered to a validation survey in 31 provinces in China. Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify the structure of the scale. Confirmatory factor analysis was applied to verify the structure of the scale and to validate the scale’s convergent and discriminative validity. Known-group validity was also examined. Cronbach’s alpha examined the internal consistency reliability of the scale. Results: 292 scales were completed and returned for a response rate of 85.6% in the pilot study. Exploratory factor analysis of the scale suggested a five-factor solution (Cognition and attitude, Knowledge and skills, Objective conditions, External cooperation, and Support from managers) accounting for 66.03% of the total variance. 443 scales were sent out in the validation study, with a response rate of 81.0%. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a good fit of the structural model for pharmaceutical care barriers. It showed the scale’s good convergent and discriminative validity (The average variance extracted >0.5 and composite reliability >0.7). The scale could also identify the differences in total score among the clinical pharmacists from different hospital grades (p < 0.05). Cronbach’s alpha is between 0.658 and 0.896, indicating good internal consistency. Conclusion: From the perspective of clinical pharmacists, this study has developed a scale to assess obstacles to pharmaceutical care. The scale comprehensively encompasses barriers to clinical pharmacists’ cognitive and ability-related aspects, hindrances encountered in collaborating with other health professionals and patients, and barriers to the working environment. The reliability and validity have been established through verification. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10373295/ /pubmed/37521472 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1194901 Text en Copyright © 2023 Chen, Yang, Huang and Xi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Chen, Liangjiang
Yang, Nan
Huang, Yuankai
Xi, Xiaoyu
Development and validation of pharmaceutical care barriers scale in Chinese hospitals: a cross-sectional survey
title Development and validation of pharmaceutical care barriers scale in Chinese hospitals: a cross-sectional survey
title_full Development and validation of pharmaceutical care barriers scale in Chinese hospitals: a cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr Development and validation of pharmaceutical care barriers scale in Chinese hospitals: a cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of pharmaceutical care barriers scale in Chinese hospitals: a cross-sectional survey
title_short Development and validation of pharmaceutical care barriers scale in Chinese hospitals: a cross-sectional survey
title_sort development and validation of pharmaceutical care barriers scale in chinese hospitals: a cross-sectional survey
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37521472
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1194901
work_keys_str_mv AT chenliangjiang developmentandvalidationofpharmaceuticalcarebarriersscaleinchinesehospitalsacrosssectionalsurvey
AT yangnan developmentandvalidationofpharmaceuticalcarebarriersscaleinchinesehospitalsacrosssectionalsurvey
AT huangyuankai developmentandvalidationofpharmaceuticalcarebarriersscaleinchinesehospitalsacrosssectionalsurvey
AT xixiaoyu developmentandvalidationofpharmaceuticalcarebarriersscaleinchinesehospitalsacrosssectionalsurvey