Cargando…
Significance of methylation-related genes in diagnosis and subtype classification of renal interstitial fibrosis
BACKGROUND: RNA methylation modifications, such as N1-methyladenosine/N6-methyladenosine /N5-methylcytosine (m(1)A/m(6)A/m(5)C), are the most common RNA modifications and are crucial for a number of biological processes. Nonetheless, the role of RNA methylation modifications of m(1)A/m(6)A/m(5)C in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37496082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41065-023-00295-8 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: RNA methylation modifications, such as N1-methyladenosine/N6-methyladenosine /N5-methylcytosine (m(1)A/m(6)A/m(5)C), are the most common RNA modifications and are crucial for a number of biological processes. Nonetheless, the role of RNA methylation modifications of m(1)A/m(6)A/m(5)C in the pathogenesis of renal interstitial fibrosis (RIF) remains incompletely understood. METHODS: Firstly, we downloaded 2 expression datasets from the GEO database, namely GSE22459 and GSE76882. In a differential analysis of these datasets between patients with and without RIF, we selected 33 methylation-related genes (MRGs). We then applied a PPI network, LASSO analysis, SVM-RFE algorithm, and RF algorithm to identify key MRGs. RESULTS: We eventually obtained five candidate MRGs (WTAP, ALKBH5, YTHDF2, RBMX, and ELAVL1) to forecast the risk of RIF. We created a nomogram model derived from five key MRGs, which revealed that the nomogram model may be advantageous to patients. Based on the selected five significant MRGs, patients with RIF were classified into two MRG patterns using consensus clustering, and the correlation between the five MRGs, the two MRG patterns, and the genetic pattern with immune cell infiltration was shown. Moreover, we conducted GO and KEGG analyses on 768 DEGs between MRG clusters A and B to look into their different involvement in RIF. To measure the MRG patterns, a PCA algorithm was developed to determine MRG scores for each sample. The MRG scores of the patients in cluster B were higher than those in cluster A. CONCLUSIONS: Ultimately, we concluded that cluster A in the two MRG patterns identified on these five key m(1)A/m(6)A/m(5)C regulators may be associated with RIF. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41065-023-00295-8. |
---|